Robotic Affection

In this odd new world that gets presented to us through TV, media and general propaganda, there appears to be a fair amount of focus on humanlike androids. The concept isn’t a new one, and has been suggested in many a movie and TV program or series. But in the last couple of decades, it’s not been so much about useful inventions, machinery, technology and convenience for humans, it seems to be more about replacing humans in a way. Or at least to try and phase out a humans need for another human, maybe. I think perhaps it is overlooked by many, just how energising it can be being around other people. Not ones demanding anything of you, or where you have any set purpose or task to perform (although having a audience with their full attention on you must be a good feeling to a point), but just people being people. Physical contact with human skin can help to produce oxytocin, a good feeling chemical in your brain, similar to showing affection to animals as well. That’s why they say a hand on a shoulder or a hug can go a long way to just help someone feel less alone and comforted.

Harlow and his study on dependency. You should look up that study if you aren’t familiar with it. It’s a heart-breaking watch, but you can read through it on wiki. A baby monkey was taken away from its mother, and given two alternatives. One, a cold hard frame of a ‘mother’ which would dispense food, and the other which had no food, but was wrapped in a terry cloth and was a softer ‘mother’ option. The surprise apparently for them, was that the baby only went to the hard framed mother when it had food, and then went straight back to the comfort of the softer one. Shocked they were. Yeah right, they would have known these things beforehand, but just wanted to see and decided from that, yes, infants feel attachment towards their care-giver and it is an attachment called love. Cruelty as its finest. That was in 1958, so makes you wonder just what they had been doing all that time within psychiatry, medicine and emotional development of people and animals to come up with that.

Anyway, from that idea I theorised that there is a detachment they are trying to cause in us, trying to fully understand attachment, which we all seem predispositioned with at birth, to be able to create the opposite. But the way they seemed to want people to view each other as potential hazards and germ factories, the carriers of death itself, and purposely encouraged shunning and abuse made me think there was a bit more to it. They wanted to see people being hostile to each other, afraid of each other, so I have given thought to why, other than the obvious of facilitating the ‘pandemic’. It also serves a purpose to make people feel more detached from their fellow humans, and if we are not getting what we need from other people, we will be needy, missing something, searching for contentment. And that is where industry steps forward with a ‘solution’, and for some people, they say they like the idea of it.

iRobot – a film about the future, where robots are fully alongside humans, part of society, but a new upgrade is coming. An integrated part of the AI system which then rages out of control. Showing us that it’s the machines we should fear, if they don’t have a human side, which luckily the lead role robot does. So, all is saved. But I still speculate in those scenarios, that they are still programmed and initially created by a person, covered in my previous article Is it really the machines we should fear? So, it always has a human influence.

M3GAN – this is a weird looking film, and has elements of the above with a malfunctioning robot and it gaining ‘awareness’, but also with a mixture of Childs Play themes, and others of possessed dolls, but this one has been designed and created for purpose, so not possessed, but sentient?

Android prostitutes – There have been various articles either hinting at, or downright expecting the future to have an array of perfectly normal relationships with a human like robot. The idea they are pushing is that they are ‘safer’ and ‘won’t hurt you’ – I suspect this is meant to be geared towards emotional hurt, because if you had watched any of the films with humanistic robots, there is a lot of physical damage and pain. So, maybe it’s a weird trade-off for some, to avoid being hurt, you therefore have to avoid being loved because the robot will never really love you, unless it is programmed to. That certainly isn’t restricted to only machinery, people do sometimes have that mechanism anyway, shielding themselves from hurt and joy, because sometimes they go hand in hand and it can be hard. But if we go down the road of living with something we expect to fill a human need, when it clearly isn’t, seems like a recipe for disaster, or at least a set up for failure and disappointment.

Humans, tv series – this was a series a while ago, I only watched the first one, because it got a bit predictable after that, but the premise was interesting. Humanistic robots as servants, helping with chores, being a nanny, assisting the family, as part of the family. They aren’t just lights and clockwork though, and become sentient, and get caught up in the human relationships and emotions.

So, from the attachment assessment above, are they trying to ‘friendly them all up’ (as they say in iRobot), to make the robots looks like us and imitate us, so that we form an attachment to them? If you started to give children a ‘choice’, they are presented with a ‘cold human’ or a ‘comforting robot’ which one will they pick? There are a number of adverts and apps aimed at loneliness, but no longer about connecting people to other people, it’s now slipping into sharing you feeling with a program. An algorithm can be your friend, and because it is programmed and has been input with the requirement and parameters of what they have decided is ‘human need’, it won’t forget your birthday, or to remind you of something. It won’t overstep the mark and take liberties, and it may even be able to work out when you are sad or happy, by your responses or lack of. So, it will seem like it fills a void that has been created by society, and you will become predictable and programmed too, so will seem that you work so well together, why did you ever need people? People creating robots, to be like people, but without humanity and then selling that back to people as a ‘human experience’. It really would be funny, if it wasn’t so tragic.

(c) K Wicks

There Is A Price

Everyone has their price, they say. And I guess if you have enough money, you really can buy them. All of them. It’s quite sinister when you see how much funding ties back to one foundation, with money in all the social pies – media, medicine, education, technology, food. No wonder it’s a pressing concern for anyone who is paying attention, as that one source of ideals can infiltrate every section of society and walk of life.

But what of the people whose price was not always monetary? We have to take them into account, the ones who were bought with fear, or peer pressure, or fame, through their ego or their vulnerabilities. Some only think in monetary terms when it comes to being bought, and I won’t deny, there have been a great many people, institutions and corporations captured by that alone. The constant drive for places to offer vaccinations didn’t go unnoticed, especially as the ‘fee’ being paid out for those was made public, the financial incentives were great, and should have been a fair warning to people, that those who were dishing them out, just wanted numbers. You were just another needle in the arm, and a pound note sign it seems. Just another brick in the wall.

Even now, some GP surgeries are advertising to their local residents, asking for them to have more vaccinations, as it is vital income to sustain the surgery. Bit more Nudge, nudge there. Trying to make people feel guilty if they don’t, for not ‘supporting’ their local GP’s. It’s just sad really, very sad. That everything really has dropped to being a number, a chart, a stat, a pound sign, what are you worth? How much can you make them? It seems so desperate, because it is. Being an individual is being encouraged to be sacrificed for the ‘collective’ and the ‘greater good’, so that a few can benefit from your invisibility. They seem to be after a rather bland, one size fits all society and people having their own ideas, dreams and thoughts does nothing to help that, in fact, it probably goes a long way to disrupt things. Because creative ideas are subject to change and are able to adapt, the ones we are currently bound by seem very rigid and sterile, lacking creativity greatly.

But in all that, there were those who didn’t appear to have a price, so the opening statement would seem to be incorrect. Some chose to lose everything or were willing to, and gain nothing in order to stand by their principles and what they knew, or believed. So, did they factor that in? Did they genuinely believe that everyone would just jump on board with all their ‘political’ ideas of a great reset, a green revolution, an agenda 30, a net-zero, a climate crisis, a pandemic, a tech rev, a digital society etc. Yes, all that within two years has been pushed to extremes within these foundations, institutions and organisations, by way of msm and general coordinated outlets. They want society to bend over backwards and accommodate all of those plans and agendas, at the same time as dealing with pending unemployment, potential financial crashes, banking issues, immigration issues, strikes and cabinet reshuffles. While at the same time as showing they are operating as a criminal syndicate, laundering everyone’s taxes and creating disasters wherever they need to get a foot hold and ultimately control over the people, systems and resources. Just a bit much, don’t you think? It’s like the lunatics are running the asylum as some might say, but you know what, if they were, it wouldn’t be this coordinated and sustained. Same with America, people joke about how incompetent their president is, and rightly so, but he’s there because he is meant to be. And it is no joke, neither there or here. There are very strange times ahead…

(c) K Wicks

Something to Consider

The coverage of ‘The Rape of Britain’ as its been dubbed, is gaining momentum. Focusing on the victims, the perpetrators and the establishments lack of action, or in some cases, direct faciliation of the abuse.

But I can’t help thinking I don’t see much about what is being done to warn, protect and educate children and young people about these dangers, and if anything the people who could, seem to have been trying to hide it. Because although these dark hearted people are about, and that we can’t always change, they don’t need to have access to a constant supply of unaware or unknowing victims now do they?

This is not a new problem, and not just a foreign one as some people think, it’s a people problem and one that all of society shares. All sorts of people, mainly men from all walks of life, are part of the problem and one that has been ingrained for generations in some cases. And obviously is not just limited to the UK. We have seen the recent case and sentencing in the Epstein/Maxwell case, notable again for the lack of convictions by any of the main perpetrators. Convenient deaths and cover ups, happens a lot it seems in that murky seedy underbelly which is now not so much under, but mainstream current. Here in the UK as well. There have been a number of crusaders, for want of a better word, who have tried shouting from the rooftops, have tried due process and following the system to try and right the wrongs. After an apparently ‘thorough investigation’ though which had the plug pulled on it, they cannot seem to determine who actually shut down this extensive police operation running years ago. Instead, it has been allowed to grow, fester and mutate in something really quite ugly. Alongside other organised crime, of which there seems to be plenty, from the top down. This country seems like a giant prison/racket.

Every day now there are articles from around the UK, and from all over Europe about violent sexual crimes against women and girls, and although I know these happen in the respective countries anyway, the shocking leap in numbers is somewhat catastrophic. Sweden has an absolutely horrific set of statistics, showing the systematic destruction of their way of life, culture, country, laws and sense of peace that used to reside there.

And the worst part is, we know why. Because the culture and mentality that is being allowed in to flood the existing culture and mentality, is not compatible. A medieval mindset is making its presense felt. But how are you meant to recognise it? If someone is saying all the right things, and appears to be westernised, how do you know? People lie and dupe others all the time, for financial, emotional, political and sexual gain. But this is so much more sinister, it’s a prostitution racket under the guise of a religious practice. Now, don’t get me wrong, there is a huge problem with how women are viewed by religions, all of them, but this is the one that is knocking on our door right now, so is the point of discussion. The imported Muslim attitude that has appeared in droves, daily onto our shores. Organised crime on a level we can only imagine to get them in, then a huge set up going on once they get here, where all the official departments have their hands in the pie.

I know we had an issue before this recent influx, of separated schools, minimal integration for some, cultural differences making a divide that seems unfixable. Again, that goes for many religions, it’s all kept very separate and ‘stick to your own’ kind of thing. And I also know that you shouldn’t tarnish everyone with the same brush, but there appears to be a very sinister plot unfolding, which is using the hostilities and suspicion to stoke fear and further the divide. Because in a normal world, it wouldn’t matter what colour you were, or religion, or what background you were from, if you do terrible things to children, you should be punished. But with the new wave, there have been new, daily reports of attempted kidnappings, children being followed, approached, harrassed, assaulted on buses, filmed while out with friends, and so on. The list is horrendous of what they are dealing with on a constant basis. Add to that the online pressures, influences and stresses being shoved down their throat everyday by way of media, schools and government nudge units, I really feel for young people, and for all the children who are now adults, who were totally abandoned to a corrupted system. The violence amongst young people is rising too, I see reports of teenagers beating up teenagers, turf wars, higher depression and suicide they say, more self-harm and psychiatric problems. All when you are trying to find yourself and a way through this world, you can’t, because the world just keeps throwing it at you. And for lots of people, it really has always been that unstable and unkind, throwing you from pillar to post and all you can hope is that you make it through. I also know that social media plays a rather large role in this too, when people want to have an image, or be seen as something, get a following, and then having an audience makes them do things they wouldn’t unless they were trying to impress people. But the lack of experience and judgement often shows clear as day, and they don’t have the forethought to know how it will play out. I guess that’s how you learn though.

It’s ok to want to grow up quickly, or wish you were older and allowed to do things that ‘grown ups’ get to do, but children wanting to feel older is one thing, and one they won’t always understand the implications of. i.e., pretending to look older to get into a club, and once you are there pretending to be 18, it is thought by others you are 18, and expectations go with that, if you catch my drift. Being a teenager felt like a huge trial at the time, an endurance test of stress, confusion, fear and excitement, and isn’t an easy stage of life, for anyone it seems. So, being able to understand what expectations adults have of you should be quite important, for all sorts of reason, but for safety as well. I think many of us may have found ourselves in situations which were deemed ‘in over our head’, and had to work out how to either get out of it, or get through it. But you don’t always understand really what is going on.

And this is where I, like many others, are very uncomfortable about male drag artists performing for children at shows, libraries, schools, churches, etc, in sometimes extremely revealing clothing with very sexually suggestive ‘dance’ moves. Some people claim it’s just a bit of fun, but being honest, if you wanted to do something fun for the children, why didn’t you do something fun they wanted to do? How many 4, or 6, or 8 year olds when asked out of the blue what would be a really fun thing to do, come back with, “You know, I would like to go and see a fully grown man gyrate around in fishnets with their ‘boobs’ out please”. If they did, you should either ask what they have been watching, or who they have been listening to, because most kids don’t unless there is something very wrong going on in their life. It’s not hard to get kids attention with sparkly, shiny, bright colours and party like themes, so is it really the ‘dancer’ they are enjoying at all? Or the over the top-ness of it, the outrageous way that an adult is allowed to prance around, when adults are usually seen as authoritive, or grown-up.

So, it’s fun for the adult then? Which would ordinarily be fine, we used to have children’s presenters who are usually good with children, like playing silly games and ‘being on their level’ for a short time, same with teachers I guess. But in that, there is no expectation I believe, for the child to come up to the adult’s level of comprehension or understanding, yet it seems the children are being encouraged to imitate the behaviours they are being exposed to. It’s not just watch and enjoy is it? It’s interactive and imposing on their personal space, often. So many boundaries being crossed with this, and it is disappointing that more people don’t see it. And they don’t seem to see the overall sexualisation of children generally, it’s all connected in my view, how they try to make out it’s not a big deal, on both issues. Oh no we can’t say anything, we’ll seem racist? Oh no, we can’t say anything, we’ll be called homophobe or transphobe? Screw that, if I think I see children being taken advantage of by emotionally dysfunctional people who are just trying to justify their own sexual gratification, I will say it. Life can be hard enough as it is without someone forcing their own dysfunctional ideals and wants on others, I think we’ve had quite enough of that already don’t you know…

(c) K Wicks

It Lives

Creating life, sometimes from death. Many a book, film or idea has been put forward about reanimating the dead. There seems to be a mild, if not fanatical obsession we have about the dead, and what may or may not happen in the afterlife. The Egyptians worshipped and revered it, as did the Mayans they say, and other civilisations and cultures throughout history have had a place for it. Life and death go hand in hand. Halloween approaches too which is apparently the day where the lines are thinnest between what is, and what it to come, and maybe sometimes, things can cross over, or come back. But in many of the themes I will use as examples from films, it isn’t always about stopping death, or bringing someone back, but about creating something new, from something dead.

Frankenstein – A tale of longing, madness and revenge. A scientist builds a monster from ‘human scraps’ and gives it life, through the medium of electricity. Note that, it’s a running theme you will notice.

Weird science – a great film, where two teenage boys decide to ‘create’ a woman using computer programming and a plastic barbie doll, and what should be the catalyst for making it work? A crazy lightning storm just happens to hit the house. And suddenly, there is life.

Short Circuit – A military robot gets hit by lightning, and it creates ‘life’ in him, developing a personality and learning. Another great film, and although not a human as such, it is still lightening and life. Which leads into the next one quite neatly.

Transformers – not the robots themselves, but the focus of the films, the Allspark. A metal cube that has the ability to give ‘life’ to metal objects. A spark of electricity is seen being emitted from it when it it’s activated.

War of the worlds – machines in the ground, activated by extreme lightning from the sky.

Resident Evil – The whole premise of the film starts around a virus, the T-Virus. A liquid compound that when injected into something dead, will bring it back to life. But as with most weird and unnecessary creations, it doesn’t stay as liquid, turns into a gas, and has a horrific effect on already living tissue, thus creating the ‘zombie’ for the storyline. No lightning, but a weird play on creating life, because it turns it around and creates ‘living death’. As I mentioned at the start, it doesn’t always seem about saving people from death, but about creating something new, from something dead.

Pet Semetary – this one being a classic example of that, trying to bring back a child, but what comes back isn’t what was expected or happily received in the end.

Nine – slightly different film to the above, but a delightful watch being honest. But the premise is the creation of nine little dolls, which each have a part of the scientists’ soul in them. He put his living self into objects and gave them life. It also has hints of a technological revolution and takeover by machine, and is a great story. I enjoyed it very much.

But they all have a thread of there being a mechanism, a spark that creates life. We bring people back to life with electricity to the heart when it stops, and people can die by being struck by lightning. A big bang of sorts to the system it is introduced to. Like what the hadron collider is trying to do. People think of it maybe creating a black hole, or a vortex, but what if it is there is create ‘life’ from the underworld, raising a leviathan? I’ll leave that idea there; it crosses into other realms. Once they reanimate or create something though, can you maintain it as such? All the storylines show that no, we can’t control it, but it doesn’t stop people trying. To be the commander of life and death really would set you apart from the average person. But what if you could, instead of creating ‘life’ from death that staggered on in a half-life, do the opposite. Create death within life, to have the same result of a half-life, creating a shell of a person, I only say this because it sometimes appears that is what has happened to some. And while in some ways I have speculated on their being another entity here, using our dead as vessels as said in the film Dark City and in my article Not like us, maybe I have missed the obvious. That they may also require the living, even though I should have realised this after writing Vampires, but not as you know it, but sometimes it takes a while to link things together. Because although things like this may only be fiction, and work their way into storylines and tales, there is no harm in considering what if it was real, and to ask yourself, would they? Could they? Have they?

(c) K Wicks

Planting the seeds

It struck me this year, when I gave even more thought to food, growing and seed gathering, just how many plants have seeds. It sounds stupid to some people, of course they have seeds. But I mean seeds you can plant and grow a whole new plant from. Hundreds in some cases, thousands in others. Yet we casually discard them, or wantonly breed them out. I thought seedless grapes were great at first, then it dawned on me. If you can’t get the seeds from the plant, you have to buy them from somewhere. So it is in the interest of the food controllers to get rid of seeds. But you can’t just do that, so as far as I know, they came up with a cunning way to bypass that little detail. They tinkered with the genes and edited them, to be sterile. This is how I believe Indian farming has been tainted and ultimately controlled. Same with lots of African countries. They get offered ‘help’ with agriculture and farming practices, and get hooked into an ever more expensive buying cycle. It’s the opposite of self-sustainability under the guise of it.

But there are still really seeds and food all around us, growing back each year and finding it’s own way. Despite our uses of chemicals in pesticides, fertiliser and all the industrial waste we dump, nature finds its way. The birds lend a helping hand too, dropping all sorts of seeds as they go about their day. I have had at least 6 cherry trees and 2 plum trees start in the garden from flyovers. And elderberry which has sprung up. Other things have found their way on the wind I suspect. This year though, I’ve been trying to be more proactive on saving seeds, to see what you can get from just your average garden and shopping. I’ll list them –

Raspberries, lemon, orange, tangerine, melon, peppers, tomatoes, carrot, sheep sorrel, wheat, rosemary / Calendula, pansy, nigella, poppies, sweetpea, snake’s head fritillary, erysium, yellow clover.

Getting started with growing things is so easy, and ends up creating a great routine which includes understanding nature and usually a bit of exercise and outdoor time. Being involved in the life of a plant is nice, and it’s a responsibility if you are it’s sole care-giver. Meaning, if you put it in a pot, make sure you look after it or you won’t get the best out of it. The same can be said of people I guess, but that will be another article, available here – Plants and people. But it is rewarding, in energy and with food, which is also energy, so it’s a swap. you look after the plants and they will look after you…

(c) K Wicks

Why Do You Want To Be Monitored?

It’s interesting and bizarre in equal measure, watching people seemingly happy and wanting to be monitored. If you have been reading my articles, then you will know there have been a few on the subject, Ministry of Monitoring covers them all, but it struck me as odd today that some, if not many, actually want it and are inviting it. So, are they in their right mind? Have they been hypnotised to say whatever they are told? Or do they genuinely believe it is a good thing? The main comment I will use to highlight this has been made recently on one of Joe Rogan’s podcasts, I must confess I haven’t actually ever listened to him or his interviews, and this is based on the clip provided on social media. Talking to the Rolling Stones founder, who happened to say he thought the government should be in charge of regulating the internet. Cue some very obvious objections from Joe, pointing out that they are the ones who regulate everything, for their benefit. That’s the brief of that, I guess if you want to see the whole thing, you can.

And although the interviewee couldn’t really explain why they thought it was a good idea after saying so, and sort of back tracked a bit, I’m not so sure it actually worked, pointing out how wrong it is to let one governing body have such access and control over individuals and groups of people. Even though I have given it much thought already, still may have missed a connection, I guess slightly touched upon in Holding us back. The fact that some people want to be ‘parented’, which appears to be tied into the digital omnipotence that marches towards us. And I wondered, is it easy for perhaps religious people to adapt to this new ‘god’ that will be the seer of all, knower of all and decision maker in your life? I grew up thinking it was super mean to ‘put the fear of god’ into people, to give children a horrific image to have in mind of burning in hell if you don’t do something, or do do something. But I realised what a handy tool it was, for control and power, as I’m sure many have, including the ones who wield it over people. The effect that can have though, is an easily controlled person through fear and imagery, you may know some like it, and it isn’t just religious people it seems. Over the years, people have got used the government being there as a ‘helping hand’ or just to guide you through society, taking money from you to you know, build back better.

Many people seem to struggle with managing themselves, or life in general, and I can’t help feeling that the ones who apparently govern us, have created much of that, and capitalise on it. Making everyday life so confusing, stressful and difficult to navigate for many, that it appears we need to have someone or something to ‘keep us all in line’, convincing us that it would be pure chaos without them. But what seems to be happening now is the edges are fraying and the veil is wearing thin, they don’t seem to be able to maintain their hollow shell of a society running on pure consumerism. Capitalism is dead they declared, Consumerism is king, some decades ago now, and they want you to be hooked on whatever it is they are selling. And they are pushing what they sell, every day in more elaborate ways, through various mediums, but this time there is a new twist. You won’t be the consumer anymore, you will be the product and you will be consumed, and already are to a point. They are taking your time, thoughts, emotions and what you are, turning us into what they want, to service their needs and desires, ours become irrelevant. But there is another thing they might be cashing in on, people either not wanting to rock the boat, or to be people pleasers, and if you find yourself to be a combination of the two then may in for a rather dull future.

And what of that future, where you will have all your choices and decisions made for you, or by way of very limited options, we are halfway there already with society arranged the way it is. Class divides, financial divides, more and more regulations. Within that they now want to scan your face everywhere you go, take away money and replace them with ‘credits’ instead, which will be programmed to be spent on what they chose, and to expire if you don’t spend it by the time they say. When it is said you will own nothing, and be happy, people think mainly in material terms, and maybe that is what they are saying. But it could be that they also mean they will take a sense of ownership away of you, not just the material things, but your very desire to want it. And if you own nothing, then what does it matter if someone takes it from you? Your possessions, your thoughts and time, family, your body? Where does the sense of ownership stop being material and start being about self-responsibility. Where we have sayings for it – ‘owning up to the truth’ or ‘owning your attitude’ which is about you personally, and it may just be that sense of ownership they are after.

But to get there they need to be watching, interfering and manipulating the outcome, convincing and encouraging people to be herded into their pens. Because otherwise, without constant reinforcement of the new regime, people would start to wonder, and think about the world around them, and quite possibly realise that it is all a sham. Makes me think of the bit of the X-men film, the second one I think with Wolverine finding out stuff, and the other adamantium mutant, where to maintain her state of compliance and programming, a droplet of some synthetic drug is put on the back of her neck (as with Magneto in the film too). Well, maybe that is just the heavy portrayal of drugging people into compliance, which some won’t recognise as they aren’t having a toxic substance burned into their skin. Yet, if you sugar coat said substance, and call it something fancy and get a doctor to prescribe it, people will take it willingly if you tell them they should. It’s disturbing how they have convinced so many people that they are a problem, or they are dysfunctional for not being able to cope with or fit into this odd set up we call society and reality. Not really allowing the questioning of the set-up, just blaming people for not fitting in or keeping up. Prevention rather than cure used to be the saying, well, not anymore. Almost as if they have their fingers in their ears and are shouting ‘we can’t look at why that happened, we are too busy dealing with it happening’, having caused said happening in the first place, and bloody well knowing it.

How and why they want to monitor you needs to be paramount in this, I have often heard people say that they have such a boring life, they don’t really care if someone wants to look at all their purchases. And others who seem to like the idea of having a ‘companion’ to encourage that diet plan, or motivate you to do that daily exercise you have been meaning to do, and that is how these things start. They cash in on your weakness and vulnerabilities, loneliness, lack of direction and confusion. And even the opposite can be harnessed, by appealing to people who think of themselves as strong, driven and savvy. All these conveniences, apps, incentives, rewards they put forward are all part of a bigger picture I feel and part of the monitoring scheme in general, but then again, maybe it’s just another conspiracy…

(c) K Wicks

Incoming

Logans Run. I mention that film a lot, and give it thought often even though I only saw it a few years ago. And where we find ourselves now in society, leads me to wonder if we are in the pre stages of such a dastardly idea, as we wonder with many a ‘storyline’ these days.

The premise if you don’t know it, is a large group of people live in a domed city, and have implants in their palm, which turns red when they turn 30 (in the book it was 21). Marking the age of being extinguished, which they wrap up as an ascension of sorts called the Carousel, and keep everyone placated and simple throughout their lives to keep the cycle going. Until someone does manage to break through it all. It’s a great film and much more to it.

The terms that get used these days for where they want to steer society, the grandiose ideas of the global organisations heading them, sometimes make me wonder. And although this does fall into the conspiracy theory pile, I still give it thought. Agenda21/30. It could simply be what it says, enacted in 1921 set to run and complete by 2030 – not started in 2021 as some speculate. I also separated the wording in my mind. So, it becomes ‘A Gender 30’. Thinking just perhaps they might be working towards one gender, to go with their one world everything. They blur the lines so much; it fits neatly into the future ideas for a separated completely homogeneous part of society. And it could well be, those type of places already exist, where people have been grown and manipulated in a secret separate society, and if you look around, it seems that it is the case. So only partly conspiracy theory then it seems, because we are very clearly being steered by a selected group who have been ‘educated’ differently and do wish to impose their ideals on people. ‘Smart’ cities and other things with that prefix, are not smart for us, but for them.

They have never had the interest of the individual in their mind, it appears to be a collective they are working towards, and if they ever do appear to embrace individualism, it serves a purpose. The idea becomes mainstream, indulged, distorted and ultimately corrupted into the groupthink. Sounds very Borgish to me, you will assimilate. And with the new word on the street for the future augmented ‘human’ being Homoborgensis, you may see why my mind might come to these conclusions. And if you read my previous articles, I have already speculated on this, but every day seems to herald new information or research which ties in, or is at least painting the picture of that occurring. Anything that seems to be about helping small groups isn’t what they are about, it’s the group as a whole they are thinking about, and you either serve a purpose or are in their way, with both resulting in being expendable. We would do well to not forget it.

(c) K Wicks

Plants and People

It’s not hard to see in real time what the environment around them does to living things. Every person who has had a houseplant, and maybe struggled with keeping it in the best condition, will know what I mean. Or grown anything in a pot, where you are responsible for its wellbeing. It may seem obvious but I’ll spell it out, because people remind me of plants with the same need for nourishment and optimal conditions for the best chance of a healthy life.

If you put a plant in a dark corner, a pot that’s too small and don’t give it water regularly, it starts to look haggard. Drained and tired, struggling to hold on and make the best of itself. It’s awful once you realise it’s your fault, but can be fixed. A new bigger pot, fresh earth, water, sunlight. And within a couple of days, it picks up, starts to look fresher and more vibrant. Signifying the conditions are suitable.

The same can be said of people, and any living animal or organism. If the conditions are just right, they can flourish and grow, and if the conditions are not, it can turn them into a tired, stressed, strained, possibly angry version of their former selves. There are internal as well as the external conditions to take into account as well like nutrients, exercise, light and sleep, but they all play a part. This is why when the environment around us is engineered to be stressful, with fear and compliance as a driver, it will have an effect. When they talk of shutting things down again, dimming the sun and restricting your food, water and energy, it starts a mental process that leads into the physical one.

So, it really does boggle my mind that so many people, teachers, parents, education authorities all at the same time just threw children mentally under the bus when it came to lockdowns. Don’t get me wrong, I am no fan of the education system, and believe they are indoctrination centres for the early stages of development. But to have the whole system reorganised in an instant pretty much, with the timetables and goalposts changed constantly, and disappointment and grief thrown in to boot, it was a lot from the get go. Emotional, educational and developmental disruption was obvious, which is why it astounded me so much to hear people minimise it, or plain dismiss it. ‘They are resilient’ we heard. I won’t lie, I was shocked and knew what would follow when it finally became too obvious to hide, that they weren’t all just going to bounce back, and weren’t just able to breeze through unscathed in mind, body and emotional development.

That bring me back to plants, seedlings, and small budding plants. When they are in that crucial stage of development, if there are extra stressful circumstances, like lack of water, infections, not enough food, light, or space, it can severely affect the overall development and growth. Some can overcome these extra conditions and then thrive, if they are temporary and then corrected. Not all though. But left in the small, overcrowded, sub-standard conditions, life can survive and struggle on, but in a very limited condition and certainly not all make it, and not many thrive. So, I keep this in mind when I think of people and society, and of the daily environment that surrounds us, and of the expectations placed upon everyone to thrive and survive within that. Making sure to take responsibility for those areas when it is within your capability and not leaving it to someone else, because they may be trying to use a one size fits all approach or are working to something that benefits them and their environment or situation. Be the master of your own destiny, as the saying goes…

(c) MKW Publishing

Code of Honour

A code of honour. Is there such a thing? Sounds mythical doesn’t it, that there are a set of values and rules that are honourable and maintained? Yep, mythical. But we are given rise to believe that there was such a thing. Some people do have it within themselves to have a decent code of conduct and live by it, but as a group and a society, we do not. I suspect it’s because we have no honourable people at the top, at all. So, the laws and rules they write for themselves and others, lack heart, decency, courage and honour. And it shows.

Honour amongst thieves, I always found an interesting saying as it inferred that the criminals would watch out for each other in times of need, to a point obviously. And along the way of learning about past criminals and seeing how things still work, I can see why that saying came about. And I realise it covered all illicit activities, not just thievery because as time has gone on, what is considered to be a crime, has been decided by in some cases people who themselves have broken the law. So, I can see why not everyone may agree with certain decisions and laws. But having looked at it, this entire country appears to be a rather large criminal enterprise and a cash cow for those who have positioned themselves above us.

Realising when I was younger, that people spoke of a time before, back in the days and times of the Krays actually, of there being street order, which kept things in line. People policing themselves but someone being in charge, and making money along the way. Punishments, incentives, rewards. Same systems really, but in a ramshackle way, as people do. And as criminals try to quash their competition and take the whole market, that’s what the establishment did. Took over the organising of crime, and deciding who remains in the ‘market’. Once you clear the way, you’ve got free reign with limited competition, and if anyone isn’t playing along, well, it seems the establishment has all sorts of elaborate ways to ruin you. Weirdly though, they now don’t seem to want to do that anymore, got bigger fish to fry with the digital enslavement to enact, so the streets are going to shit, for want of a better phrase. Because there is no-one now to get everyone in line, we are too far gone with enterprises from other shores now cementing their foothold.

We have a bit of a system too, where yesterday’s criminals and terrorists can be today’s politicians. In my lifetime I have seen someone go from being pinned up as Mr Terrorist in Ireland, so hateful his voice wasn’t even allowed on TV. He is now a politician over there. So, it suits their purpose to change the goalposts when they feel like it, or it’s a strategic move to gain something. Like I’ve said before, these people are playing a long game, and we get swept up with it.

It doesn’t suit their purpose however, for people to be able to communicate and act outside of their game plan, rules, systems and procedures. This is why over the years they have put things into place to minimise it, like licenses and regulations for things, health and safety, new laws, new systems, but it all neatly seems to tie in to their want of everything being digital. I knew cash would be on the chopping block as soon as taxes starting going digital, because they cannot monitor, tax or control cash, therefore they cannot control the people associated with it. So, in times like this, you need to ask yourself who the real criminals are, and whether they have tried to make you hostile to someone earning cash, because if you ask me, we would all do well to go back to cash as a first step to remove their overreach and excess power they have gained. If they can decide to freeze your bank account, stop you participating in society, leave you to die on your own, just for a political move, do you really want people like that having full unadulterated control over your life? And none of that is conspiracy, it actually happened and will happen again if we let it. We are all going to be viewed as a problem to the system eventually, they will find something wrong with all of us and why we don’t fit, because their system is wrong. We are not meant to be in it, and each time they try and change us and mould us to fit, we lose something of ourselves. And maybe some would like that, maybe they don’t actually like themselves and want to be part of that weird new ‘plugged in for life’ system. But for the ones who don’t, I suggest we start having our own code of conduct amongst ourselves, because there is no honour left in the higher levels, so it’s down to the ‘thieves’ to take it from here…

(c) K Wicks

What Are We?

There seems to be much debate at the moment over what it is to be a Woman, and that people suddenly seem unable to define what that is and how it differs from a Man. And equally, I’m sure we will have issues with the word man soon as well, because you know. Equality. Even in confusion apparently, we should be equal. However, it is an odd reality to see grown men, and yes, women, trying and find words to use other the perfectly good ones we already have in use. The fact that a small group of society, who are not women, try to make it a taboo word, isn’t going down too well. And correctly so, it seems a rather deviant and shifty move to try and commandeer the term woman and what goes with it, while at the same time trying to stop it being used in its applicable context. From where I am sitting, it looks a lot like ‘imitate to infiltrate’ and is not for any good purpose. And it’s odd, to want to be accepted as something you are actively trying to erase, shout down and not allow as they are, as if the majority don’t see it as a tactic of just getting your own way, in the game of society. Acceptance needs to be within yourself and should never be expected from anyone else, or required. Be happy in your own skin they used to say, until suddenly they had ways to make lots of money in offering you ‘new skin’, in the form of make-up, clothes, jewellery, cosmetic surgery, lifestyle, etc. Money, money, money. If they couldn’t make any money from all this, do you think they would be in the slightest bit interested if someone felt sad, or depressed, or at odd with themselves internally. And do you think, that once they realised they could encourage those things in people, and it would make them lots of money, that they just shook their head and said, oh no, we couldn’t do that, it would be unethical?

We are a product of our environment they say, and I guess they gave it away with the wording. We are a product to them, to be manipulated and steered at every possible opportunity for the benefit of their profits. I’ll share another paragraph from the book I am reading to give you an idea of just what they think of us, and how they went about spending billions of dollars, just to work out how to make us spend more money and consume more. Sounds ridiculous doesn’t it, but like they say, you’ve got to spend money to make money.

The Hidden Persuaders – “Thus it was that merchandisers of many different products began developing a startling new view of their prospective customers. People’s subsurface desires, needs, and drives were probed in order to find their points of vulnerability. Among the subsurface motivating factors found in the emotional profile of most of us, for example, were the drive to conformity, need for oral stimulation, yearning for security. Once these points of vulnerability were isolated, the psychological hooks were fashioned and baited and placed deep in the merchandising sea for unwary prospective customers”.

Quite shocking really, but not surprising. They have been working out who you are before you even knew, helping to steer and shape the desired outcome, check out my other article Nudge, nudge for a little more on current methods being used to force compliance in a more communistic approach.

But back to the current issue about the ability to use words that have a meaning, because some people don’t like the meaning or definition, because it doesn’t define them. Like I said, odd times. To me it’s like insisting you join a chess club, then moan all the time about the people playing chess, and start insisting they should be playing darts. So, instead of being logical and joining the darts club, or starting one, they bully and hound the chess players until they either give up and leave, or give in and stop playing chess and start playing darts. It might seem like a silly analogy, but that is how it seems. And I won’t lie, there appears to be an awful lot of issues towards women, coming from people who claim to want to be one. And by trying to dismiss concerns around it only seems to confirm there is a problem, otherwise it would be a normal open discussion or debate.

But are we just the sum of our sex, our sexual interests and our anatomy? Does that completely define who we are as they are telling us it should? We seem rather stuck on the perception of the external presentation of ourselves, trying very desperately in some cases to convey on the outside what is on the inside. I wonder why that is. And why it seems to be pushed as a dominating agenda in the public mainstream, encouraging that people need to be validated because of who they are, whatever that should be. But why? It is not important to me that people see on the outside how I feel on the inside, I am not a greenhouse. Showing your emotions is one thing, or wearing your heart on your sleeve as they used to put it, but trying to be a see-through entity that everyone can and should know and fully understand by just looking at you, is weird. And some people having, what appear to be full-blown tantrums or mental breakdowns in public (and private I guess), and displaying very aggressive language and threats sometimes, because someone mis-labelled their exterior in their view, is just too far out, beyond the realms of normal and severely lacking in any etiquette. Are they of such a limited emotional capacity that they simply cannot cope when encountering a normal interaction in the ordinary society most of us know or a differing view to their own? Or are they genuinely expecting everyone else around them just know what they are doing, how they are feeling, what they trying to be? And that goes for anyone who is trying to externalise their inner self, and then expects people around them to ‘act accordingly’ to pander to it, and I guess, stroke their ego, or alter-ego as may be the case in some instances.

Now more than ever is it important to know who you are and how you feel, not because someone told you to, or because you are expected to, but because you know it within yourself. Because as I have written above, there are forces at play looking to find, exploit and manipulate your vulnerabilities, just for the purpose the Consumerism.

(c) K Wicks