There have been some very strange occurrences over the last century, this one being a very odd and unexplained one. Fatima, Portugal in 1917. Three children witness an apparition, on three separate occasions leading to a massive event (which was predicted by the apparition). Witnessed by over 50,000 people it is said, and was well documented. Reports say up to 80,000 witnessed it, but I’ll go with the lower estimate, which is still extremely impressive. Testimonies were taken and books have been written about this event, which has been mostly described as ‘the sun dancing in the sky’.
Much was going on at that time in history with the first world war and the ‘Spanish flu pandemic’, so it’s possible that it was barely even noticed outside of Portugal with various media blackouts happening at the time. The church however, were straight on it, declaring it visions of the Virgin Mary and taking it over pretty much and then deciding on what information to release about what the apparition told the children.
It’s quite a strange story, with the Vatican being at the centre of withholding the information on the third prophecy that was apparently given, and the oldest child involved went onto to become a nun, and never disclosed what was revealed to them. All very odd. But of main interest to me, was the completely conflicting testimonies of what people said they experienced and witnessed, kind of throwing into the spotlight how we say a witness is the weakest form of evidence. How our perception and memory aren’t always entirely truthful or accurate, but we are very trusting of what we think we see or know. In that occurrence though, it was generally agreed the sun moved from its fixed position and did move across the sky, there was light, movement, brilliance, some people got drenched and were soaked through after, others were dry. And no-one really knows what happened, what it was, or what they did actually see. Only what they thought they saw, which was not the same as others when described.
Giving a very classic example of how we all are experiencing Separate Realities, different viewpoints, perspectives and visual perception, as also mentioned in Seeing Colours. Showing that when it comes to things that appear to be seen by many, we really cannot presume that they all saw the same thing. And that event was in front of people, in the flesh as you might say, compared to much of what we ‘see’ today by way of screens and paper reports of things. Which of course can be manipulated, fabricated, edited and of course tailored to suit one pair of eyes, without them even knowing. What are looking at, is not necessarily what you are seeing, what a strange concept but does seem entirely reasonable. Makes me wonder about all the other things I ‘think’ I have seen…

(c) MKW Publishing






















