The Fatima Event, was it a miracle?

There have been some very strange occurrences over the last century, this one being a very odd and unexplained one. Fatima, Portugal in 1917. Three children witness an apparition, on three separate occasions leading to a massive event (which was predicted by the apparition). Witnessed by over 50,000 people it is said, and was well documented. Reports say up to 80,000 witnessed it, but I’ll go with the lower estimate, which is still extremely impressive. Testimonies were taken and books have been written about this event, which has been mostly described as ‘the sun dancing in the sky’.

Much was going on at that time in history with the first world war and the ‘Spanish flu pandemic’, so it’s possible that it was barely even noticed outside of Portugal with various media blackouts happening at the time. The church however, were straight on it, declaring it visions of the Virgin Mary and taking it over pretty much and then deciding on what information to release about what the apparition told the children.

It’s quite a strange story, with the Vatican being at the centre of withholding the information on the third prophecy that was apparently given, and the oldest child involved went onto to become a nun, and never disclosed what was revealed to them. All very odd. But of main interest to me, was the completely conflicting testimonies of what people said they experienced and witnessed, kind of throwing into the spotlight how we say a witness is the weakest form of evidence. How our perception and memory aren’t always entirely truthful or accurate, but we are very trusting of what we think we see or know. In that occurrence though, it was generally agreed the sun moved from its fixed position and did move across the sky, there was light, movement, brilliance, some people got drenched and were soaked through after, others were dry. And no-one really knows what happened, what it was, or what they did actually see. Only what they thought they saw, which was not the same as others when described.

Giving a very classic example of how we all are experiencing Separate Realities, different viewpoints, perspectives and visual perception, as also mentioned in Seeing Colours. Showing that when it comes to things that appear to be seen by many, we really cannot presume that they all saw the same thing. And that event was in front of people, in the flesh as you might say, compared to much of what we ‘see’ today by way of screens and paper reports of things. Which of course can be manipulated, fabricated, edited and of course tailored to suit one pair of eyes, without them even knowing. What are looking at, is not necessarily what you are seeing, what a strange concept but does seem entirely reasonable. Makes me wonder about all the other things I ‘think’ I have seen…

(c) MKW Publishing

What Do You Know?

Information and knowledge. Never has there been a time when it seemed more important, and it always might have been that way in some format, to have accurate information, truthful accounts and records, and to receive things as they were intended. But given what have and are seeing around us at the moment, I am sure it was always that way. Either trying to make sure correct information got through, while simultaneously having other methods in play to keep the real information hidden. All adding to the Jigsaw of Life of course, but also meaning it takes an awful lot longer to actually learn what you might need to, which will be different for each person by their own definition. And we are told that we all need to go to school, to go through that formal establishment of education, where they tell you what you need to learn and you come out the other end, Institutionalised in some way ready for the game of society they have prepped and primed you for. But instead of it being for the industrious society we were told it was for, and was perhaps for the previous generation, now we have something more akin to The Beautiful Mice situation, where it has become some strange social experiment gone quite wrong.

Information has now been weaponised, distorted and is being repackaged as ‘data’ and is now the be all and end of everything, apparently. The internet doing a marvellous job of creating what we thought was going to be a treasure trove of facts and records, anything you could ever want to know, all in one handy place. Sounds so naive, doesn’t it? But I bought the lie, thinking it was great at first, how handy and convenient to have access to everything. Then you start to think about it, and realise it was a very foolish move to just believe ‘the internet’, and because it was in print it must be factual. Even genuine things are updated, and change as the years and decades go on, so a book you read from a hundred years ago, may not have the correct information, and later editions update this. But if you are reading a first or early edition, how would you know?

It seems though, it has always been easy to fabricate or eradicate anything that are no longer required or poses a potential problem in the updating of ‘facts’ and when a new set of rules or ideals is being implemented. Much has been overwritten, rewritten, destroyed or hidden over the centuries in the pursuit of whatever purpose it was for, with violence and fear and possible a few strategic fires here and there to keep it all ‘as it should be’. But someone always remembers, and people talk, luckily, so things would have still remained in the knowledge of some people, perhaps being handed down, told as stories eventually with threads of the original truth still there, making their way sometimes into myth and legend, as can happen with oral and verbal telling’s.

And from that, we clearly must understand that although we as people have a great capacity to remember, we also have a problem with lies and exaggeration. And wonderful as our imaginations might be, occasionally they stray and may not be the most reliable ‘source’. Yet, these days, we have extra obstacles to this with the Madela Effect mentioned in Hard Copy and Memory, and deliberate disinformation being used in media circles, there is much to work through. Needing to know what is relevant, what to assimilate or ignore, and protect your own psychological self from the ideas put there to distract or harm you. With plenty of Missing information to keep people guessing and keeping them limited in their capacity to know things. Perhaps it’s all been so messy and inaccurate for so long, some people do not care anymore If Truth Be Told, and what’s real or did or didn’t happen at any point. Limited in their ability to understand the bigger picture and don’t employ critical thinking skills, or are not one to look back or ‘dwell in the past’ as we call it with no retrospective thought applied. To mull over what you think you know, to wonder how you came to know it, and ask yourself, is it something that you really know at all…

(c) MKW Publishing

Gridlocked

People have noticed and mentioned there is a similarity in ancient structures to modern technology. A formatted structure and layout, similar to our computer components of today, circuit boards notably. And even outside of cities, we are all on grids for our services. It’s only the more rural areas that might be considered ‘off grid’ as the terms goes.

Cities generally are also on massive grids and seem to pull energy towards them and generates huge amounts itself, being alluring and a draw for some, and completely repellent to others. Feeding from it as it feeds from us. By now I think we presume cities are necessary, and probably just formed ‘naturally’ as a consequence of industry and growth. But I do not think so anymore, more leaning towards a forced enterprise as with everything else. Where people were manoeuvred into those cities through various acts and laws after being kept in the countryside being manual labour for the Lord of the Manor, having a set contract, movement and pay restricted to make sure you stay in place. Kind of like the film The Truman Show, where Christoff is talking about him “he can leave at any time”, but every barrier will be in your way to that, and they will psychologically cripple you if you happen to start to see through the illusion of ‘freedom’.

And as we know, cathedrals and cities aren’t new, so this isn’t a new idea at all, and what made me think of it again was from a film, as usual, which isn’t a new one either. The only new component to the thought, is the regular talk and articles around data centres. A condensed version of a city, or not so condensed when you see how much area they cover. Taking away prime farmland, homes, wild areas, forests and so on. Nothing seems to be spared or sacred when it comes to their placing. And maybe that’s how it was before, when the first suspected components were installed, Cathedrals and Abbeys. Both usually having quite a footprint and foundations. And cities we have today, are vast and often keeps growing as the population does, expanding and innovating, modernising as I guess we call it. But before they were there, they weren’t. And were probably farmland, and houses, and forests as well as relics of the previous times and technologies of their day. Not to say it is right, but to point out this isn’t a new issue or problem we face as a collective.

But I guess the two films that sort of simultaneously tie this idea together for me are Hackers, and Ghostbusters. For Hackers, it is the scene once they have ‘hacked the Gibson’, and are cruising around looking for the garbage file, flying through a simulated ‘data city’ of skyscrapers, looking at the grid from ground view rather than from above as we do with the comparisons. This one just being from below, and you see a Tron like version of a ‘city’. Full of data. And for Ghostbusters, the first one back in the day, where it turned out the whole building was designed specifically to open portals, with the materials being of importance as well as the overall architecture. But scale that whole idea up and merge the two, that the entire planning and layout of the whole city is important, as well as what it is made of it seems. And what it holds, is data, us. Previous cities that might have gone off plan or formed on their own, having potentially suffered one of those ‘great fires’ we hear much about in the past, thereby clearing the way for a new one keeping in line with the others.

And perhaps those buildings and cities have been harvesting us already for centuries, our data, emotions, energy, time and money. And what do we get told we are getting in return? The future. Where countryside and rural hold us back, only sweeping technologies and surveillance can save us now, apparently. From what, I don’t actually know, because it appears to be the technology and surveillance that is the most looming threat being touted. And just as data and computers once filled an entire room, and now is a tiny chip, maybe data centres are an evolution like that. Unfortunately meaning we have already been ‘harvested’ for quite an age, all the while busy working to harvest for ourselves and others. Kind of like as mentioned in It’s A Bug’s Life Being An Ant, or the idea in Terraforming, likening the situation to the film Oblivion, where the TET is allowed to freely drain all the fresh water because the ‘survivors’ have been told it’s being taken to a new home. The illusion to keep the project going in a fictional fight for resources, but that’s just the movies, isn’t it? On a screen with a well-crafted script and actors playing their part, nothing like real life at all we are told, but we also appear to receive our information about our ‘real’ illusion from a screen only now, with a not so well-crafted script, and ‘actors’ also playing their role. Where the pieces just get reshuffled now and again, and a new attention grabber is wheeled out to enthral and engage the masses online. But just as many people ask and speculate, one can’t help but ask the questions, what do ‘they’ actually want from us? And where does this all go…

(c) MKW Publishing