
(c) K Wicks

(c) K Wicks

(c) MKW Publishing
The strangest tale
A scourge on our time
Of demons and evils
A sinister crime
A darkness unveiling
That more can now feel
No longer it matters
What they say is real
Because with a knowing
Is an absence of fear
It’s more than belief
It’s a deep-felt idea
That in their quite twisted
And augmented dream
Where they cannot let go
Of this digital scheme
They’re caught in a loop
And cannot now stray
There’s too much at stake
And now is in play
It’s not as sewn up
As it maybe appeared
It’s gone rather rogue
And now really weird
With things being darker
Than some can admit
But others who’ve noticed
Will no longer sit
And allow this disaster
On our watch to unfold
And when the time comes
We need to be bold
~
In these strange times ahead

(c) K Wicks
It seems their hand
They’ve overplayed
And their welcome
Well out stayed
A box of worn tools
That wants to dictate
Creating a landscape
Of worry and hate
Of numbers and rules
And pawns for a plan
Not about living
But more if they can
Crush and contain
What it is that we do
Wanting to change us
To be something new
A dampened down version
To do as we’re told
The future’s not bright
In fact it’s been sold
But we are complicit
If we do go along
With all of the bullshit
And all of the wrong
That is now around us
And more than on show
Time keeps ticking on
And further we go
~
To whatever end

(c) K Wicks
I’m not sure what’s happened
It’s like a strange veil
Is moving its way
With a mind to derail
Because if people
Could really give thought
To think a bit further
Than the narrative taught
Then maybe they’d see
That the ones trying to show
And tell you of darkness
So many now know
But those are the folk
Who mostly now choose
To shout if they can
With so much to lose
Yet the ones with their hands
Quite firmly in the pot
Just push it further
And seems they will not
Admit they are part
Of the sinister whole
They created for purpose
To gain full control
~
But all is not going to plan…

(c) K Wicks
It’s funny really, when I think of the last few years and the overwhelming push online, to show that everything will be digital. Including people and lives. As I’ve said before, and this should not be overlooked in its implications, but we are no longer consumers in the old sense, we are becoming products to be consumed by the corporations. My piece Consumerism goes into that a bit more.
But what amused me, is while telling us how it’s all going to be great, a technical revolution in fact, everything digital and electric, and you will just be a set of data codes to run along inside that. We are also being told how unsafe and perilous it all is. Cyber-attacks, power cuts, supply chain issues, financial collapse, even of the crypto currencies it would seem. Your accounts can be hacked and you can be frozen out if they don’t like you, or there is a simple glitch. Like saying come and live in this straw house, it’s totally safe. Oh, but now it’s moving day, I need to let you know it is prone to catching fire. You would think again, wouldn’t you? Or someone advising you to get married, telling you that person is great, oh, but hang on, by the way they’ve cheated on you and you’ll have to get divorced pretty quickly after. Again, you wouldn’t do it. Well, I like to think people wouldn’t.
Unfortunately, while some of the above is being implemented whether we like it or not, that is not to say it will work, because we are still required to perform a function. Monopoly doesn’t play itself, and it can’t only work with just a banker, so it needs the ‘players’ to make it work, that’s us. And some of them obviously, but they make sure they have Mayfair and Park Lane sewn up, and we get a small piece of Whitechapel and Old Kent Road, if you get my meaning. And when you see a representation of when someone gets really pissed off, playing forever and losing all the time, and they suddenly stand up and flip the board to ruin the whole thing and storm off, it ends the game doesn’t it? Obviously, I know we can’t just tip the board upside down, life is slightly more complex, but you can make it so that you are not such an integral part of making all these new systems they want permanent, if you really don’t like them. As with much past and present, they like to create and maintain an illusion of something, and if the mind should choose not to delve or think beyond the facade, then it works just fine. But like those fake house frontages in Leinster Gardens in London, sometimes it really does appear as it should, fitting in to the normal eye, but behind it is something far different. Also think Truman Show, when he breaks from his routine and enters a building, and the actors then scramble to remove him and hide from view what gives it away. Kind of like how it seems when something revealing and often has a thread of truth gets posted online, and there is a sudden rush to declare it ‘misinformation’, or to discredit it. But to be honest, if it is a dead end and not true, then what does it matter if someone gives it time and thought? It’s their choice to, and if it goes nowhere and shows nothing, then what’s the harm? But if it does go somewhere, and there is something to reveal, well, there would be a reason to want to derail or halt someone’s line of questioning or thought, wouldn’t there?
So, while some people may think everything is as it seems, and those pushing new products and social changes just want better for everyone, there are others who do and will continue to think differently. To look at the overall purpose or financial gain that might be achieved by such a move, or how it could be used for nefarious purposes, and given what we have seen already, I believe that is the best way to think…

(c) K Wicks
A debate that is not new, but has found new ground in recent months on the internet, in the Roe vs Wade case, and in ongoing tooing and froing between people of different opinions and reasonings behind them. But I can’t help thinking in all the talk, some of it directed towards women being seen as murderers, said a person who pops up now and again on the internet with a significant reach and audience of what appear to be real people. It was said that he thinking women having an abortion is as bad as man being a rapist. Strange I thought, that he doesn’t use a similar comparison, with one of death. But instead chooses to liken it to an act, that in itself can cause a situation where some women find they are impregnated from, and then chose to take steps to severe all ties with that man.
I try and understand why some do and some don’t, some may be able to move past that terrible act, and give life, and maybe some don’t want to feel tied to that soul through another, even if they are a long gone horrible moment of a soul. The reaction towards it from others, is something to behold. But it feels like there is more to it, not necessarily from the people with reactions and opinions, I get that, and they are fully entitled to them whether I agree with them or not. But the strange endless stream of establishment things to be involved in the process of procreation, from social rules and etiquette, to judgements and family pressures, pharmaceuticals to help you get pregnant, and to stop it. And then comes the real bone of contention, the medical interventions to halt an ‘unwanted’ pregnancy. It seems like a normal thing to have right?
Maybe not so much when you read about planned parenthoods objectives and methods of controlling certain populations, and various things that have gone on under the radar mostly. And we have to mention the booming industry surrounding abortion, and the purchase and use of the tiny little baby parts and sometimes fully formed babies that they use for testing, and creating vaccines, and other ‘medicinal procedures’. It’s quite horrific, what they do and how they evidently must view people, children and babies. As expendable products, and you know what, some of us can see it and feel it everywhere. But not every loss of an unborn child is down to a deliberate act, not everyone has a smooth ride, and complications can arise at any time, with nature sometimes stepping in apparently to see fit to end it at a certain point with a miscarriage. People don’t seem to blame the woman then, don’t have a go that her body decided to reject the fetus, but when it is her mind doing it, there appears to be questions that others have, even if it might not be their place to ask them perhaps.
It makes me think of Shiva though – “Shiva is known as a creator, protector, and destroyer. Destruction and creation are inextricably linked”. Having the power to create, protect and destroy seems the kind of power a man wouldn’t want a women to have, even though it is women who have all given birth to men (as far as we know), that doesn’t mean they are happy about it. Maybe that’s why there is talk of growing fetus’s in pods – my article Pod life for a little more on that, and turning girls into boys, removing their reproductive organs. And for boys who want to be girls, well, it limits their ability to ever have children as well, so would definitely limit the gene pool as they might say. There have been sterilisation programs here and there over the years, and it may well be that it is the ability to breed that they are trying to quash, rather than just people in numbers directly, who really knows. That is still conspiracy theory at this point.

(c) K Wicks
What is it you are afraid of? Your surroundings? Your government? Are you afraid to be yourself? If you answer yes to any of those questions, do you ask yourself why that is? I have written a few pieces on fear, covered in Sensing fear, but wanted to look at the words behind it, and how we use them to express what we think it is that we are feeling. And how others then see and may perceive that differently.
Afraid – “feeling fear or anxiety; frightened”.
Are you hesitant, apprehensive, scared? We have many words for this, but with those words also comes different meaning – which can be interpreted differently by people. As we know. Anxiety is also put in there, which seems to be a big thing these days, and to be honest, I get it, there is much to be anxious about, and not entirely by accident I feel. Because we humans are prone to feelings, and we have internal alarm systems that not everyone is aware of, or have not quite harnessed yet. Triggers to tell you something is wrong, feelings to alert you to possible dangers or just to keep a look out. Surely that’s normal? So, at what point is it deemed not normal? Enough so to whip out a prescription book and make sure those feelings are numbed, or suppressed, or removed altogether. We know that prescription drugs can have all sorts of side effects, covered in An error, but a big one, but further to that, I wonder if by turning off or supressing the natural instinct and workings, that in itself could create a type of anxiety or at least an internal reaction. Like driving at night and the lights on the car start to get dimmer and dimmer, and then stop working. But the car still runs, and you have to keep driving, but whereas with light and seeing where you are going, it was easy. Suddenly, it’s dark and perilous, doesn’t feel safe, so your heart level goes up, you start sweating, your breathing shallows to cope with the extra concentration needed to just drive. And you don’t know how long the road is, if it will get light again, or if you could steer off into a river, or a cliff at any moment. So, you grip the steering wheel, so tightly you think your fingers will break and you might stop breathing just from the overwhelming sense of dread. Unfortunately, that can describe either being dulled out of life by drugs, or simply just by life itself, anxiety can be caused by life, and by not experiencing it properly. It’s tough, and definition of words, their meanings, and what follows on from that is important too.
Phobia – “an extreme or irrational fear of or aversion to something”
Now this is quite puzzling to me to have two different meanings within that definition, which is where I believe we get confused when people say that can’t be a phobia, because there is no irrational fear, just dislike. Meaning they, as I, didn’t fully understand there was a double meaning going on there.
Aversion – “a strong dislike or disinclination”
Disinclination – “a reluctance or lack of enthusiasm.”
Strange isn’t it to have such different meanings when it would seem clear cut, phobia to me should mean irrational fear, aversion should mean strong dislike. Even disinclination means two things, being reluctant, or lacking enthusiasm. And again, those two can come from very different places within someone’s mindset or thought process. Reluctant being more hesitant, and lacking enthusiasm to me meaning can’t be bothered, or isn’t motivated towards it. So, when we think we understand what we are saying when we use those words, and what others are saying, may indeed be quite different. Which is why being able to effectively communicate what you think, and understanding what it means is important. Because when you believe you are saying one thing, using the correct and clear words, someone else may be hearing something else entirely.
An Alan Greenspan quote springs to mind on this
“I know you think you understand what you thought I said but I’m not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant“
So, can you perhaps see why it can be very easy to miscommunicate with someone, unless you are taking the time to understand as well as convey your own thoughts and feelings. Many suffer from impatience when it comes to others talking, and I wonder sometimes if it is because they are not paying attention and would rather be somewhere else, are perhaps not fully understanding the conversation, or could be they are just plain rude. It’s tricky working out which one it is sometimes without just coming out and asking, so I do ask, because if I am taking the time to talk to someone, I do not want my time wasted, or theirs, so it needs to be a beneficial exchange.
And recently, words have been weaponized and redefined, making it even harder for some people to communicate without being able to navigate the way in which they are supposed to talk and think according to society at the time. This is why I wonder if there are more people who are afraid to be themselves than we realise, fearing the repercussions of having their own opinion, own ideas, own perspective, own identity, because it will be shouted down, ridiculed or persecuted. So, maybe it seems easier to just follow the crowd, be seen as a parrot, or be ‘sheep’ as people often call the masses, as they can just get on and get by, without too much fuss. Don’t Rock The Boat they say. But what if you are sat in someone else’s boat, and you don’t want to be there? You can see your boat just over there, waiting for you to take you on your adventure, yet here you are stuck in someone else’s, being talked at, told what to do, with no end in sight, and for no good reason. Suddenly the saying don’t rock the boat doesn’t seem so applicable does it, because with that thinking, you’ll never get to your boat, if you get my meaning. And when people say things like, we are all in the same boat, I often think what a clever way to get people instantly ‘on board’, you see, they have other words to make the metaphor even more meaningful. Yet, I still saw though it and realised that it was their boat, and their direction, meaning you are only a shipmate and being taken along for a ride. You can never be the captain of someone else’s ship, remember that. And when it comes to being afraid, I get it, it can be daunting to be at the helm of your own life, being the centre piece, the lead role and the director and the writer, all the time. And I understand why people sometimes might want to be an extra, or a bit part, or behind the scenes and not have or take any responsibility. But I also understand that some people who relish the leading role, will want their own extras, locations, props and people to run around helping to make them the star in their own life, which is where it can become destructive, if ‘the extra’ to their life isn’t aware that’s what they are.
So, while we are trying to work everything out and get through life, we are also being constantly bombarded by things to trigger our senses, and often we are not allowed, or are restricted from indulging them or acting upon them. We have influences put upon us from day one, and it is nurtured carefully thereafter, with systems, repetition, conditioning and modifications, to have people doing what is expected of them. And if they look like they might be wanting to be independent, another round of medications, another dose of fear and regulations, knowing the triggers have been placed for whatever their choice at that time, having already laid the groundwork through media, education and entertainment. But that only works if it works when needed, the best-laid plans of mice and men and all that…

(c) K Wicks
It’s what we are
That seems to be what
They’re trying to change
And just cannot
Bear the thought
Of humans being
So deceived we are
To keep us from seeing
The idea in whole
That they are hell bent
On what we would call
Their plan to augment
Subtle at first
But then fast engineering
Coding the future
They think they’re steering
This rather vast ship
That we find ourselves on
Stuck in the grid
Like that film, you know, Tron
But something about us
It just doesn’t fit
Or what they require
Need us all split
Divided and fearful
And blind to their goal
To take human beings
And have full control
Over our lives and flesh
Our thoughts and dreams
The world that we knew
It’s not as it seems
~
And turns out never was

(c) K Wicks
How is it that some people came to be so detached from reality? It’s a funny thought really, considering we are all going through life within our own reality, yet we take part in a shared one as well, so a dual-reality I guess. I have talked of this before in my article Separate Realities, but it is starkly obvious that people not being in the same shared societal reality is a big problem, because it leaves us vulnerable as we now are seeing. Large groups of people can be manipulated and taken advantage of, without them even knowing. I’ll use a Carl Rogers quote here, as an eminent person, some people have been shocked to have this quote attributed to him
“We can chose to use our growing knowledge to enslave people in ways never dreamed of before, depersonalising them, controlling them by means so carefully selected that they will perhaps never be aware of their loss of personhood”.
Chilling, isn’t it? And just to note, many of us did notice, but over the years they found various ways to dismiss or ridicule those concerns. And if we didn’t get with the program? Dissenters, conspiracy theorists, weak mental state, dangerous, and all sorts of other labels they latched onto to use to their advantage and against people. Using them to turn average people against each other, and even against themselves.
So, how is it that so many people are oblivious to what’s really going on around them? Are they only able to view the world through their own narrow lens, no capacity for anything outside of their own rigid frames? I believe the answer to that, is a definite yes. In these times of orchestrated agendas, people are being used as weapons and pawns, so the easily led are a great asset to those who wish to disrupt our day to day lives even further. Screwing the future while they stamp all over the present. But we must take into account that it has been a long time in the making, creating compliant, dumbed down people who aren’t really paying attention. Give them bread and circuses they say, keep them entertained. That works to a point, and if you look back through history, the parts we can presume may be taken from something that actually happened, we see there have many an uprising, revolt and fight back. All failed apparently, or thwarted at the last minute, conveniently, which is where I think maybe that’s just how they decided to write it. Putting in into the psyche of the people that they can try, but will always lose. I mean they have literally been rewriting the present as it happens, so everything previous would have been overhauled to be favourable for those in power. Suitable for a purpose. Guy Fawkes, the Luddites, French Revolution, American revolution and civil war, English civil war, to name but a few key moments here and there. And that purpose of which discussed in my article, When someone else saves the day.
It has however, been continued on through this last century through various means and methods, including commercial, economic, psychological, medicinal and educational. A work in progress where they need enough people to be in such a muddle and a bind in life, that they accept what appears to be on offer, but remember, it only appears that way. Try and look through the deception and cover stories, to the real motive and desire for things, because those two things are pivotal. Yours and theirs. They create the bind and muddle in the first place, thinking many won’t notice, then pretend to be on hand to offer a solution. As I said in It all starts to unravel, the ones who ruined you, are not the ones to save you, remember that…

(c) K Wicks