Kill switches – probably not just for cars. If they have worked out how to install a chip into a human’s circuitry which they apparently have with brain chips, then they surely would have thought of a handy mechanism to be able to switch it off. Like the cars and machinery, we’ll be subject to the same limitations. Seeming more and more like logans run every day, because with a ‘kill switch’ comes the ability to decide when someone needs to expire, in their view. Suddenly seems easier to imagine how they could limit everyone to 30 years doesn’t it?
Also, if you have a chip, or something say, magnetic implanted, maybe that’s how people could be kept in ‘smart cities’. There will be a physical barrier you cannot cross or your implant explodes, or could just simply hold you there. Sounds like nightmare science fiction, but is it really fiction?
There was talk at the beginning of the mrna drive, that there would be chips or devices implanted via the vaccines. A few people shared apparent videos of Bluetooth ID’S showing up on people after jabs, and magnetic capabilities at the injection site. Whether real or not I followed the thought .
What if the purpose of it, if real, is to firstly monitor everyone. Give people a ‘code’ on their first shot, then you can monitor each subject and each ‘upgrade’ they deliver with each shot. The fatalities are possibly where the system or host is not compatible with the technology being written in, or can’t adapt quick enough. So faulty, expires, dies. Others will be integrating it, and maybe they are looking for the ‘one’ who can withstand the technology implants fully, to really create a fully functioning cyborg. If they haven’t already.
There is also the possibly of using the signal to that code for other purposes, or there may be other programmes running in different people, like a set of instructions, but not the same for all. And with that maybe, you could control/trigger vast numbers of seemingly unconnected people to behave in a certain way of the programmers or controller’s choosing.
Example – rage. I will use a movie reference here again, 28 Days Later. The reason I think of it isn’t because of a zombie in the normal sense, covered in my article Zombies, perhaps? But more along the lines of how that film presented it, as a virus (as did Resident Evil). But recently I saw an article about how some scientists ‘accidently’ turned some hamsters into angry rage filled creatures by doing some gene editing. And well, these recent gene therapies being masqueraded as vaccines could well be editing in something they apparently did not foresee. Or did, who can be sure.
But if you can activate a large group or multiple individuals at once, and control say, anger, or fear, or confusion at the flick of a switch, what exactly could be done with that? Give it thought, because they will have. And some videos are emerging currently of people having what can only be described as a weird episode, before they appear to fall to the floor in a type of rigor mortis type state. It could be they are suddenly aware of the system editing taking place, they hear/see things, and then short circuit. Who knows, it’s a thought in progress so I’m still working on that theory. Or the videos may just be further fear propaganda, either way, both options are being considered and I will continue to give thought to what appears to be going on. Technology is not being used as an ally here, and we would do well to remember it.
It’s been a barrage of psychological techniques and manipulations to achieve desired outcomes. But let’s look at who that was and what those desired outcomes were because this isn’t just theory, this was used against people in their everyday lives.
As this whole lockdown debacle started, it was noted on a few posts online that there was a document going round which appeared to show a psychological strategy for, well, to put it plainly, scaring the shit out of people. That’s the non-technical term for it, they called it a ‘Nudge Unit’. A team of behavioural scientists and specialists who were tasked with working out how to turn you against people, how to manipulate your feelings with the use of wording and incentives. You might have heard of them, part of the Independent Sage group they were, also in that group was Neil Ferguson, famous for being wrong on many occasion spanning decades, yet his projections were used as the basis for much of the societal procedures that were followed. But the people behind the behaviour, ones like Susan Michie being put forward as the face of reason, despite heavy ties to communism and the CCP’s way of thinking. It should have been clear for many to see, that these people did not have ours, or societies best interests at heart. That all these groups usually tie back to the overall industries and foundations that fund them, that fund getting a certain message across. Fear and compliance. I covered some of the techniques used in The three D’s of conversion under coercion but it’s more than that.
Those people, and other government departments sat down and deliberately decided to instil fear in people, whether it was necessary or not. A cruel and continuous process of heaping mental pressure and stress on them, knowing many wouldn’t cope, deliberately splitting up families, letting people die alone just so they could get their ‘desired result’. Fear and compliance. Because it is much easier to blindside people and lead them astray when they are frightened or worried. But still it is an engineered response. Decide what you want to happen, then place triggers and reminders to condition people to accept that outcome, the one you have chosen for them. Like I said, cruel.
And the repercussions of which we are now witnessing. With countless vaccine injuries, more mental health issues for people, grief of not seeing loved ones in the final days or months, economic impact, all still happening with more being piled on every day. Food crisis, money collapsing, new viruses, war. It’s sounds ridiculous, doesn’t it? And it is, because it’s meant to be so outrageous and overwhelming, that you won’t have time to take it all in. They want you to be pulled this way and that, to not know what’s coming next, to not relax and gather yourself. Headless chickens are what they want. There is a saying I have thought of often in this, the first line from Rudyard Kipling’s If,
“If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs and blaming it on you…”
The name of the book should give it away really, what its purpose was. The Doomsday Book. Also known as the Great Survey (there’s that word again, great). Created over 1,000 years ago in 1086, it was the first step towards where we are now in my mind. A register, where everybody in the land of England was visited (apparently), and all their assets, property, land etc were listed, so they could be taxed or taken off them. And tax people they did, for various things over those years, working out that it wasn’t enough to only take on the main things, they needed to reduce people’s wealth, while at the same time as increasing theirs, same shit different day.
We’ve had window tax, that many have heard of and you can still see the remnants of that time, with bricked up windows and seeing where they once were. That’s the only reason I had heard of it, I asked as a child why there were bricked up windows in so many old buildings.
Another one I learnt of in the last few years, was hearth tax. Yes, they actually taxed you on how many fireplaces you had, or places to heat food, meaning you could have more than one family in a house, yep, tax ’em. Suddenly films like Robin Hood don’t seem so far-fetched, well, maybe the bit about someone standing up to the establishment and getting things back in order, but not about the taxes on the poor. That bit is very true, and of barons and lord of the manor, we still have them today.
In these modern times though, they have been stealthily been putting together their digital doomsday database, of what you have and what you are. But is it just for taxes this time? They talk of you owning nothing and being happy, so how exactly are they going to go about achieving that for you? We have the 10 year census which gives them all sorts of household and personal information, they can access your bank if they want, which shows them your financial life, they can check your insurance which tells how much you have within your house and how much your possessions are worth, they know your political history through voting records, or lack thereof. They know what you learn and are educated with at school and university, they know your medical history and family situation usually. They can see what you buy at the supermarket if you have a points card and use a digital transaction for it, they know where you socialise when you use your card, and who you mix with and what you say if you do it via social media or your phone. They know what you watch, when you watch it, what you play, how long you play for, what makes you stressed, what makes you happy, when you get ill etc. It’s a lot, isn’t it? Has anyone in your entire life ever known that much about you? Or you about them?
But all the above doesn’t in itself mean something nefarious is going on, even though it is no secret they spent billions of dollars in the 50’s and in subsequent decades on psychological research to manipulate and change people’s habits and needs to make them that way. What does seem to be revealing the nefarious side of it all, is what is now being proposed which involves all of the above. The drip feeding of what they would like to happen by way of digital control of your life, and what’s more terrifying than what they propose, is that lots of people don’t seem in the slightest bit bothered by it. But that could just be a result of the constant programming that occurs to try and make people more compliant. Check out my article Consumerism for a little more on that.
They want to dictate what you can own, if you can have a house, or a job, what you can eat and your food allowance, they want to decide if you are mentally and physically healthy. They want to tell you what is correct, and what is wrong, how to think and what to think. Individuality, choice and free thought seems to a real thorn in their sides. Not for the benefit of the people, but for the benefit of their systems and profits. And in order to maintain that and steer it where they want it to go, they need to herd people along a certain path. It’s happened before, just in a more analogue way.
After the first doomsday book, over the coming times they restricted people, wrote new laws, boundaries, land agreements, taxes, systems of order to control people. Creating slums and low wages between themselves to keep people in their place, if any section or peoples appear to be getting too rich or too smart for the liking of the others, they are removed, or discredited, or social strife is created to change the direction. Wealth gets taken and redistributed to those who want to keep it from others, neatly illustrated these last few weeks with the changing of the monarch here in the UK. An article titled “The royal family put into law in 1993 that they won’t have to pay inheritance tax, so it doesn’t erode their wealth”. And there you have it, clear as day, your wealth is up for grabs, but theirs isn’t? And that people, is how the rich got very rich, not by working harder, but by keeping more and taking yours. Convenient disasters also clearing the way for them, industrial advances giving reason to clear out the countryside a bit, herd people into cities with the ideas of wealth and fortune. ‘The streets are paved with gold’, and people believing in being able to make something of themselves with the opportunities of the city. Not so in many cases, it’s the same then as it is now, it’s who you know, not what you know. But those ideas were put out there because it served a purpose, they want people to move around and relocate, but when it suits them. Forced relocations have been a thing, all over the world, for the longest time. Ireland, apparently during the great famine of 1845, it wasn’t just the lack of potatoes that caused the issue, the royalty at the time kept exporting food out of Ireland, they deliberately starved all those people, and encouraged more to leave. Scotland, we had the Highland clearances, only learnt about those fairly recently in life too, but again, families and generations of people forcibly moved. They say some of the Klan leaders were in on it, bought out by greed, they increased the land rent to the point of being unsustainable to force people out. It worked. They crippled people lives and way of life, just to have some land, and more money and power. Sad really that it has been going on for so long, but if you want to know how the UK came to be as it is today, I think it’s important to try and look back over how we got here.
Enslavement is not progress for us, but it may well be for the people who wish it upon us. So, when they talk of technological advances and progress, they talk of their world. For us it will be restricted living and being nothing but a resource for someone else and their way of life, and you must understand, both ways of life cannot co-exist it would seem, which is why one must go. Technology can still be used for good, I do believe that, but not when wielded at the hands of madman and their mercenaries.
There appears to be different levels of compliance occurring at the moment and over the last couple of years in people. We are in a time when we’re being subjected to a multitude of changes, rewrites and a restructuring of the technological society that surrounds us. Within that, the people who are making the changes and rolling out these new systems and procedures, need a certain level of compliance, for a certain number to ‘play the game’ that they have decided to enact. Not everyone will want to play, so they would have had to decide on methods for uptake, and keeping people tagging along for as long as possible. I’ll break down the categories people fell into from my perspective.
Dumb compliance – this is a knee jerk reaction way to get people, and does not mean they are dumb or stupid. It means they were caught unaware, often they have reacted, rather than acted, and with limited information at hand and quite possibly with the motivation of fear. I believe quite a few people got caught out by this in the early days of the debacle. Running around like headless chickens as one might say.
Knowing compliance – Where they knew something was up, but were more frightened of the consequences of not complying than they were with the stark warning starting to come from us ‘conspiracy folk’. When they know deep down, they shouldn’t go along with it, but again through a type of fear, they comply. Either scared of being judged, scared of what you are told you to be afraid of, or just scared of not following orders, some people really are happier being told what to do.
Blind compliance – where they ignored all the warnings from people because they ‘weren’t qualified’ or didn’t fit the mainstream narrative. They chose to put their trust and faith, blindly, in the system, and those that pushed it.
Sinister Compliance – the ones above are more for the people who found themselves on the receiving end of the drive to inject the world. This category I feel is more for the ones behind the needle, they don’t get much attention yet as the injured are rightly trying to take a centre stage at the moment, but it seems their time will come. I noted at the time they were making a big deal about having very meticulous records of who was dispensing each shot, and GP’s although given great financial incentives to be part of it, many it seemed went to ground and didn’t partake. Why would that be do you think? Did they too think ahead and see that they would be the ones holding the needle, therefore holding the liability if it all went wrong? So, this category is for the ones who knowingly or at least blindly ‘just followed orders’ to do their bit, to deliver in some cases, a slow working mortal shot to the unsuspecting ‘volunteer’.
Non-compliance – the control group as they were dubbed. The ones who from either day one, or slowly along the way trusted their own judgement and instinct instead of what they were told. They trusted what they knew, saw, heard and felt. But they are a problem to the project at large, highlighting and proving the case in point all along. The risk was low from what they said to be afraid of, and the risk was high for the product they were pushing. It should have been a no brainer.
But when all sides are working against you, the media, the gov, the medical establishment, venues, employers etc, I can see why so many caved or were convinced. Those departments were instructed to do that, regulations and laws invented to create the perfect set up. And make no mistake, it was a set up, and continues to be a trap that some keep willingly walking into. It’s a shame that so many people turned on their own friends or family though, those people were not regulated or mandated to do that, but they were encouraged somewhat. Through use of a ‘nudge unit’ no less, a group of paid behavioural specialists who sat down and decided how to make that happen, I’ll go into that though in a separate article. But just to highlight that these things didn’t ‘just occur’ or indeed happen ‘by accident’. They preyed on people who were indecisive and unsure about things, and they attacked people who were sure of themselves, decisive, and confident.
And based on the above results, they have determined a future outcome, and have said
“Covid-19 was the test of social responsibility – A huge number of unimaginable restrictions for public health were adopted by billions of citizens around the world”.
They seem to believe this means people will do it again, keeping in mind that many were forced to adopt these measures, if you remember some of the footage we got and still get from China about their social credit system already in place, but how they had people ‘dropping like flies’ in the streets, people being welded into their apartments and streets being fumigated. And many that may have gone along with it, could have believed in the threat at first, and maybe were fearful, but possibly more of the consequences of disobeying. So, if you are part of the fear camp, you may want to ask yourself what is it you are or were afraid of? Are you afraid of them? Or of what they tell you to be afraid of? Because being fearful can serve a purpose to you, and be helpful when acting as a signal, or an alarm, but not when misdirected for someone or something else’s benefit. I can’t help thinking though that too many people’s way of thinking and seeing things has changed, and what happened above won’t be like that again. It seems many who rushed to answer the governments calls to ‘keep everyone safe’ are either not with us anymore, or aren’t in the best shape. Predicted to only get worse the longer they stay on the market and keep being administered, so the number of followers and believers of their ‘pandemic’ are not what they once were, with much being revealed of just how underhanded and criminal it really was. I guess we just have to wait to see how that plays out, and all I can hope is that people don’t fall for it again, or believe them when they say for yours and everyone’s ‘health and safety’, it was a trap then and will continue to be, using your social conscience against you for their ‘greater good’ not yours. We would do well to keep that in mind.
One economy, one language, one currency, one religion. One world government. The new world order. Sounds very much like an imperial empire strategy, not one of peace and harmony. But either way, that is what they appear to be shooting for, one step at a time. To bring everyone together in their ‘vision for the future’, it’s been observed they are trying to break and destroy what was and what is in place for a stable, normal life. Instead, we now have threat after threat, doom shoved down your throat on a daily basis, as well as just standard propaganda and manipulation. Covered in my article It seems an attack. Mostly by way of a screen I might add, without being on the internet or watching TV, you would be hard pressed to notice anything had changed at all and in no way would have ‘seen a pandemic’. Same people walking around, same changeable weather, no-one really seems to be noticing, unless you are plugged in to the ‘world wide web’. Because we wouldn’t be able to maintain this level of input ourselves without it being streamlined for us, and fed to us in bitesize chunks, so that we can’t quite take it all in, but enough to do its job. To brew and fester, being topped up regularly with new doses of drama, ridiculousness and impending trauma. They know just how much is too much, before complete sensory overload and nothing gets in. So, it is drip fed to us, in stages and at the right time for maximum effect. It’s also a good scatter technique, being that there are so many leads and points of interest to follow, it dilutes the group who may otherwise be focused on one problem. Because not everyone can multitask or handle multiple problems and issues at once. A great line in the film Volcano, where Anne Heche (rest her soul), and Tommy Lee Jones are working it all out and she is trying to describe geological things to him, and he says ‘I can only fight what I can see’. It struck a chord with me then, and does now. Some people do only have the ability to deal with what is happening, not what will happen, others can focus on the will happen, and deal with the now. It’s varies greatly from person to person, as we see around us.
Because we now have constant access to news and information, they can and do use events and affairs abroad to be a distraction too as well as the ones at home they want you to know about. Back in the day not so long ago, you had to go to a library, or a bookshop, or ask someone if you wanted to know something. When a large event happened, you had to wait for either the 6 or the 10 o’clock news to inform you. Or the next day. Waiting for the newspapers to let you know the details, if they ever did. Now we can check on so much, so quickly, sensory overload is happening on a daily basis, and most of us actually do it willingly. Taking in thousands of images and words, ideas and opinions day by day, scrolling, skimming, checking, sharing, thinking. But what is it all for? Why do we feel the need for all this input and subsequent output it creates? They have designed AI around the human brain, so maybe we take so well to algorithms because we already were one. Seamlessly assimilating with technology and computers because we have the same set up with circuitry, mental wiring, hardware and software and processing centres. So, did they just take that bit from humans and recreate it, using AI as the cover to create half a human, the logical, cold, sterile half without heart, or compassion or feeling. Just lights and clockwork. Or is that what they would prefer we were, and that is why they try to quell what is human about us and disrupt, medicate and confuse what they call ‘The Human Condition’, as if what makes us human is what they are trying to ‘cure and control’.
It is now a coordinated effort by many institutions, organisations and foundations to change all societies as much as they can, taking out various hubs of infrastructure piece by piece to collapse the system. And make no mistake, they will already have their fully stocked and powered retreats and hideaways once they pull the plug on everyone else. They will be keeping fuel for themselves, then rationing it for you, same for food, water, money, resources, skills etc. If they just turned the lights out and walked off into the distance, we would all be fine. We would go back to a basic standard, regroup and sort ourselves out, but we aren’t in that position. They are poisoning our waterways, destroying agriculture and large parts of natural habitats, bringing and herding thousands of random people from their own countries into others, who no doubt are for strategic purposes. Because when the handouts suddenly stop for them, and they will, the crime rate will understandably increase, as it will within the native populations, because they are taking away peoples means to survive. Forcing it to move to a survival instinct phase.
Now, why would you want to destroy people’s fresh water, food, housing, education, finances, stability and safety? Sounds like a real time systematic breakdown of societies, but without everyone noticing all at once. Like I said above, they have so many areas being attacked at once, we can’t fight them on all fronts. I tried to convey this in my article It was a piece at a time, trying to highlight how they get in your life and under your skin so insidiously most didn’t notice when the process started. The politicians are facilitating this at every turn, so expecting them to ever be on the side of the people is folly, and the few who are allowed to say something, sure as hell aren’t allowed to do anything about it. They caused this and are helping to hasten it, and maybe it is unavoidable now, it’s gone too far and too much damage has been done to the people and what was a standard way of life – mentally, medically and economically. The wheels are set in motion for a showdown between the people and the authorities, they push for it at every turn and would want nothing more than for it to escalate. And I look at all these extra newcomers to the island being shown on the news and internet, and half of me sees them as in invading force as others have said, waiting for their signal to wreck havoc but the other half of me sees them as reinforcements. That they too have been used and forsaken, only needed as cannon fodder and bait, as someone always inevitably ends up being. But if people could come together and really see that it is a human way of life that is under attack, then maybe we could all be human and fight for it.
They’ve worked very hard over the years to dumb people down, distract them and supress or discourage natural instincts at every turn, so it’s not an easy task, this I understand. And now they are pulling the rug out from under people, after they firmly affixed it there, pretending they will offer you a ‘new, safer, more secure’ rug, just over there. In the form of digital debt and enslavement. By way of meters, monitors and biometric technology, to be further introduced into our lives by way of mandate, regulations, laws and rules. Talking about slowly phasing out people as part of the daily process other than as a consumer, and replacing human interactions with machines, cameras, checkpoints and credits for most normal things. For kids at school, for people shopping, working, socialising, driving etc. They would like to control it all. Why do they want, and appear to need to be so ingrained and intertwined with every aspect of each person’s life? It’s very creepy and extremely sinister, and we would all do well to start making other plans, outside and away from that odd little future they want us all to be a part of…
It’s being called digital money, but let’s be honest, that isn’t what it really is. Cash used to be money and for now still is, but they are trying to phase that out, because with it comes freedoms they do not want us to have. My other articles covering this include Cash buys freedom, which goes into that in more detail, as well as Do you want to be monitored? looking at their angle of monitoring, but it all ties in to this. One currency to rule them all.
So, what of the new currency they want to rule the world with. One currency suits them just fine, and one which is monitorable and controllable at every second of every waking moment. Sounds a tad excessive and obsessive, but hey, they are going to try and do it anyway it seems.
The main points of issue many people have are as follows – your digital currency will be linked to a social credit score, as they have so conveniently been showing us through little vids here and there from China. They don’t like what you say, no spend. Don’t like how you think or where you go, no spend. No travel, no food, no life. Sounds idyllic, doesn’t it?
They have also announced it will have an expiry date, again how convenient, for them to push the Consumerism gravy train, forcing people to spend, earn more credits, comply and behave to retain or be able to ‘spend’ those credits, play their games to get the credits. But they can take away your credits if they so choose. Like snakes and ladders I guess, but with your life, time and ‘money’. Again, what about that sounds appealing I don’t know. So far, I haven’t heard one benefit to the actual people it effects on a massive scale. Only enslavement and control. The benefits are for those who make great profits at your expense, and fund a lifestyle that they have grown rather accustomed to, and require your compliance and acceptance of this new regime for them to stay as they are. In control, giddy with power and getting more monstrous by the day. Absolute power corrupts they say, and I have to agree, but money has played a great part too. Greed of wealth and power combined. And here we are, the wealthiest people in the world still trying to make more, take more, pretend to want to help people, it’s maddening and disappointing in equal measure.
If you have been paying attention this last couple of weeks online or in the news, you may have noticed a certain online payment provider PayPal decided to just shut down a few accounts and withhold money, only once the public, press and politicians got involved has it been reversed. But more people are now aware, and wary. Bank have been doing it too, and I have read today that the FBI are being taken to court in the states, because they tricked a judge to issue a warrant so they could raid a Beverley Hills safety deposit facility. And STOLE, yes stole, $87million of cash, gold, jewellery and assets from random innocent Americans. So, the ‘professional corporations’ around us are actually just a rather large criminal syndicate operation it would seem, who are trying to make sure we don’t have any way of sustaining ourselves without them. They don’t want us having access to money, food, housing, so sure as hell won’t want us farming or growing food, or having cash around us, or owning our own homes. But those three things are pivotal to our wellbeing and survival, and they know it.
They have been taking too much for too long, proved by the amount of spending and debt they have created. sending billions abroad but can’t afford stuff? Waste more billions on pretend PPE contracts, but sorry, there’s no money in the pot? Blatant lies. And clearly, they can’t be trusted with money, so it seems bizarre that still we get up every day, to earn money which they want to take 20% of, to waste it. And soon they want to decide what money you are allowed to have and if you don’t spend it, you lose it. I don’t think so. I see a number of businesses are going back to cash from October, looks like the hike in electricity bill has made some notice how much their card machine costs, between electricity cost and charges per transaction, so to save money, go cash. And you will save a whole lot more than you know if we all went back to cash. Now. Because there are plenty of other people in this country who use it and trade with it, and I realise now that’s why they tried to make people annoyed with ‘cash trade’, surely you’ve all heard someone whinge about pubs, or markets, or hairdressers, or builders, where they say I bet they are on the fiddle and not declaring it. There has been more than enough going into that pot for the longest time, and because it has been misused, it’s no longer overflowing as it once was. So, they want to fill it up again to keep their habits, and their ideals, and their lifestyle. But by using you, your time and your lifestyle to do it.
Stop looking for the fair and equal society they have pretended they are trying to achieve, as it’s a myth, it will never be fair for all and we will never all be equal. But we are all people (I hope), and that should be a good starting point that we have that in common, and we all need food, water and shelter to adequately survive. Because while some people are squabbling about superficial differences, feelings and opinions in mind, the powers that be are taking away basic living necessities for people, in the real world and in real life. They don’t actually care what colour you are, how tall or short you are, what gender you are, how capable you are or how you feel on the inside, they really don’t care, they see you as a commodity, not an individual. It just serves their purpose to allow you to think who you really are matters to them. It doesn’t, and you shouldn’t expect it too, we are viewed as cogs in their machine, they have made that clear and when the cogs don’t do as they instructed or expected, they ‘fix’ it. So, don’t be a cog, be a person who can think and feel what they want to, while you are still able to.
It’s taken much of my thought over the years, and has been mentioned here and there in articles but in mine notably Work ethic and employment. But it’s been mentioned by way of comment on social media, how after first-hand experience, there is a large portion of a generation not wanting or willing to do something that is necessary, instead looking for the artistic job, or happy environment perhaps, and feel certain work is ‘beneath them’. And from my experience, this really isn’t a new problem, but is one that has spread.
Some people are just lazy, you can’t get away from that. Some are confused and don’t know what they want to do, some do but either don’t have the skills or opportunity available, so do nothing. Like I said, they were always there, and you could choose to be like that, and be left behind. Or you could get out there, make opportunities for yourself, or try something else as a fill in. But as it has been observed, and I can’t deny it, the long-term opportunities aren’t there, or are being taken away. Back in the day, you had more job security, your pay would go a bit further, you might even be able to save up and buy a house, start your own business, go travelling or afford holidays. Well, that has been well and truly thrown in the bin, for lots of people didn’t entirely notice the squeeze of systems that started a good while ago now.
Credit card and loans. Back in the day, before credit cards and loans were handed out willy nilly, we are led to believe that people had to save up for things, normal things like holidays, appliances, anything above and beyond the living costs of having a roof over your head. Cars were expensive (although you could always get a second-hand banger since I’ve been around), TV’s weren’t in every house and VCR’s were pricey too. You didn’t have the money, you waited. Birthday and Christmas money were special, because they usually went towards things that were just a bit out of your range as a kid. Same for grown-ups it seems. Before the lottery (which has an article in progress, but crosses into this one) people used to play the pools, trying to get a little win that would be little boost to the household purse. These last couple of decades though has seen borrowing on a grand scale, from citizen and government alike, borrowing and spending, borrowing more, spending more. It’s relentless. All about now, quickly, more. On the glad and sorry they used to call it, glad you’ve got it, sorry you’ve got to pay it back.
But what are people working for or towards these days? Even people who are driven and motivated and finding it tough, last few years have thrown many off kilter, rearranged plans and dreams, changed the entire trajectory of some people’s lives. So, I can’t blame people for being distracted or from having their thoughts redirected to something more meaningful. I guess society just can’t afford for everyone to do it at once which is the concern if a whole generation do it. We’ll see, i suspected it was because they are going to roll out automation and want people working remotely, or not at all. Just consuming and integrating with the metaverse they want everyone to simulate life in, while they roll out restrictive ‘smart cities’ for everyone. Sounds horrifying to me, but if it’s painted as a quiet, pollution free, controlled utopia, where you can just relax all the time and chill on the bean bags, catch up with your mates, do a bit of creative work if you ‘feel like it’ you know, google office style. That’s the hook, so you hand yourself over and before you know it you’ve got Logans Run meets the Time Machine’s Eloi. It’s a super creepy idea, and probably completely far-fetched, and I want it to be. I hope I look back at some of the things I have suggested and laugh, because I certainly don’t want to see any of them come to pass. But if they do, I can’t help thinking the ones who are going to be part of that future, just walked right into it…
When discussing some of the mainstream ‘conspiracy theories’ it comes up now and again about how could everybody be in on it when it comes to it being kept under wraps by so many. And it does seem like a big ask, to just think that millions of people are in on it, keeping this really big secret to themselves and actively making sure others don’t find out. There are ones who know, and ones who can’t know, but I see it as remarkably easy to get lots of people on board with an idea, and then run with it.
As the famous quote by Joseph Goebbelsgoes “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie.”
Example, I’ll use the flat earth/round earth theory/debate for this (discussed already slightly in my article Flat or Round? Keeping in mind this works for both scenarios of convincing of a flat or round surface, whichever you want to be the outcome, or indeed whatever the lie. At the start of the education system or involved industry being rolled out (curriculum, space agencies, security departments etc), you decide what to teach the top professor/ leader in their field. They then teach that to others, and so on. That’s how ‘normal’ things are put into the mainstream and a constant stream of regurgitation of the same information is had. Passed on for generations as truth and fact, as they have been taught it, until they decide to accept that new information is allowed. And equally if you wanted to disrupt or corrupt knowledge, you could do it using the same model.
There are also little things along the way to nudge it into place. Create maps to fit the picture you are painting, make the maths fit, as once you have your answer to start, you can work your way back for the formula. Start things being computerised, then you can program in whatever you want, as long as the people reading it see what they are meant to, or read them as they have been taught to. Everything can be put in place in give the illusion of a much more limited earth. ‘The world just got smaller’ they said. And maybe it did, because it was suddenly limited to us by way of an ‘Antarctic treaty’ where everyone just agreed to leave that bit and just do science on a really small, limited and restricted scale. Have to say I don’t believe that cover story at all.
With the crater earth theory, it is said to be both flat and round, as we are a flat surface within a crater – hence sea level, and the bigger planet we are part of is round, and vaster than we can imagine. With the other craters representing the other ‘planets’. So, when other life forms and aliens are discussed, they don’t mean from outer space. They mean from ‘over there’. Same with Mars missions and all the ‘space’ expenditure, it is said it’s used to try and get out of this crater, because although we say there are other craters, apparently, we are trapped in this one. I am still on the fence with that one, but interested all the same. But what if everybody knew there was more, and it was bigger, it would change the playing field a bit wouldn’t it?
It also seems to me that available maps are plentiful of what the other ‘bigger earth’ looks like, maths have been calculated and models made to predict movements of the sun and moon. Just as tidy as all the other information we have been given for the globe earth. Just lacking pictures to back it up, but I’m sure photoshop and CGI will catch up there. And for the images we have to prove the globe earth, one could speculate the use of a round lens, round telescopes, rounded glass etc, which can create the image being rounded, or fisheye as they dubbed it. Funny how they claim maps were just wrong from hundreds of years ago which shows water distribution being very different. Yet parts are extremely accurate, even to this day, but they got half wrong? Maybe there is more to see there. And anyone who raises questions can be discredited, or laughed at, or cancelled. Literally. And some people don’t want to admit they’ve been fooled or could be, so won’t entertain the thought that someone lied and they could be deceived. That would be preposterous, they may say to themselves, and shut down any further thought of it. But sometimes to get the answer which may end up being fantastical, you have to entertain the outrageous, or the preposterous. That doesn’t mean accept it or go with it, but at least don’t dismiss it unnecessarily.
I think it also suits a purpose for both flat or round to be believed/disbelieved and for people to be busy trying to argue for and against. While we take time to focus on out there, we maybe aren’t giving in here our full attention. So, all of it could be complete fantasy and just pie in the sky, we do have everything figured out, all the answers to where we are and such. Sounds conveniently wrapped up, no more thinking to be done there, right? Well, to people like me, there is…
The image of the rainbow is one I have always loved, starting in childhood with the Care Bears stare, to watching Rainbow Brite, and the story Jason and his technicolour dream coat. The wonderful array of colours, it’s nice to see. And I will admit, I have been rather sick of it recently. Glancing away from it every time I see a police car painted as it, or zebra crossing, or fire engine. Seeing it purely as a waste of money and thinking rather sour thoughts when looking at it. And then associating it with other rainbow representations which seem to have taken to being put in our faces at every opportunity. And while internally whinging about the fire engine the other day, it suddenly struck me how negative I felt towards it, the rainbow. Something that has always been represented previously as positive, magical and bright, was now being used anywhere and everywhere, but in the wrong context, to me anyway.
And I wondered, if there really could be anything in it. That rainbows are a representation of light and good, but you have to be of a good heart to make it work (cue the care bears idea), so by making people feel negative towards it, it can create more negativity. This is a rather new thought and idea, which is still forming by the way, so may seem quite out there initially, but wanted to give thought to the different references towards rainbows.
The Greek Goddess Iris – she was the goddess of the rainbow, and the messenger of the Olympian Gods. But more specifically, was known as the personal messenger and handmaiden of Hera, the goddess of marriage, women and family. It seems there is great need for Hera at the moment, in many parts of the world.
Bifrost – If you have seen the Marvel films of Thor you will know this reference, but it actually is written into Norse mythology where most of the information comes from for Odin, Thor and Asgard. Frost giants, mystical lands and legends, and a rainbow bifrost, which connects the different lands of the realm.
A double rainbow appeared in London at a timely moment recently on the day the queen died, which showed in full over Buckingham Palace.
A photo/video circulating of a shadow of a plane on clouds, with a complete circle of rainbow around the shadow. Very cool, but a bit weird to look at.
It’s theorised that rainbows are in fact a reflection of the firmament dome that we are encased in, and that’s why it always appears as a dome or circular shaped to us, like a snow globe I guess.
Either way, and whatever it really represents, I still get excited when I see one in the sky and will try and make more effort to not be put off by them in other walks of life.
There have been stirs in the world of psychiatry recently, as well as the extended branch of it which is where the issue has arisen, the pharmaceutical area. A rather damning article, referencing a rather damning paper of evidence, published only last month – The chemical imbalance theory of depression is dead detailing these findings. Yet change is not that swift in the real world of medicine, not by a long shot. As of today, it is still clearly noted on the NHS website “It’s thought that SSRIs work by increasing serotonin levels in the brain”.
The fall-out from this on the ground though is what is important, not whether they can agree or not. It’s real people who have been living with difficulties for quite some time in some cases, taking medication that they are now hearing, may in fact be useless. And these medications are not without risk, the side effects leaflets are really quite scary. And speaking as someone who has taken them, and suffered side effects, I can attest to that. They were enough to make me stop taking them, and try and assess what it was in my life that was making me feel so unbalanced, or unstable, or emotional. Taking into account everything, not just cherry picking the bits that seemed to fit at the time. I wanted to feel on an even keel, and I never did while taking pharmaceutical medications. And also coming to learn with age, that many of those feelings were actually perfectly normal for the situation at hand, or the time of life I found myself in.
But it seems there is much being revealed of late about what the effects of all these drugs really are, aside from the actual known side effects. I have written about it slightly in my article Memory, covering painkillers, and have given thought over the years to it anyway. And it seems an odd thing, and has for a while, that you would expect your body to regulate and balance itself, while taking something that is fundamentally intefering with that, on an enhanced specialised chemical level no less.
Thoughts, thought processes and emotional impulses are all working together, most the time for most people anyway, and if you encounter an overload it can tip the balance and destabilise the system. I guess they believe by shutting down or dampening one of these systems, it can relieve the pressure as it were. And I get it, in theory the idea is sound. But it’s on the premise that we are all wired mentally the same, and we are all capable of dealing with said chemical changes, hence the prescriptions seems to be at an alarming rate these days. That is not the case, as we well know, with awful suicide rates and more mental illness being identified or labelled to deal with what they say is the rise in mental illness. And I don’t deny there is a problem, we have a weird, shitty, soulless world being constructed around us, with constant manipulation and mental intrusion. I would be worried if people weren’t dissatisfied with that and showing signs of struggling. Instead of coping mechanisms though, and assessing if people are meant to be treated this way, it seems ever important to blame people themselves, and demand they adapt to the ‘new world order’ that creeps its way into our psyche. As anyone would do who is trying to make them the centre feature of your life, trying to take all your attention, telling you you’ll never survive without them, trying to turn you against your friends and family. Sounds like a terribly abusive scenario doesn’t it? And what I have learnt along the way is that people don’t always recognise they are in it, because it makes it a bit easier to make excuses or just shy away from a painful truth. Imagine how much easier it would be for that abusive person if they were also able to convince you that you were mentally dysfunctional, and needing medicating. It would serve a purpose for them in the end, making people think they are in need of extra assistance that only one can give, to dismiss others who would ‘invalidate’ their condition.
We all have hard times in our lives, and I will never deny that things can happen that will take the rug from under you and change your whole life, traumatic things, hurtful things, shocking things. But these things will happen, to you, or to those you know. And imagine a world where there isn’t a doctor to just write a prescription, or a pharmacy to just cash it, what would you do? Grief, despair and heartache. Sadness, loss and fear. They are all feelings, and ones of life despite what they represent. You wouldn’t want to take something to stop you feeling happy and joyful, would you? We embrace certain feelings in life, and seem to shy away from or try to eliminate others, but they are necessary and character building as they say. And maybe it has been too much time now and too many people switched off those feeling for too long, and don’t know how to feel properly anymore. Maybe that was the point of all the drugs after all. Who can say for sure, but I will keep giving it thought.