A reading of my article – A Different Trajectory
(c) K Wicks
We all know the term ‘Gold Digger’, don’t we? And we all think of the shallow, money driven harlot looking to exploit whoever she can for financial gain. Mostly, that is what I have thought anyway, and I believe others have too. But a few things recently have made me realise how many grades of it there are, and how those came to be. And I will admit, there will always be those who don’t ever want their own, they want and expect someone else to provide, so will be just a straight up, good old-fashioned digger.
But through various obstacles placed there by the powers that be, women were tied into this set up through societal expectations and restrictions. So, which came first? It would seem in my mind that it was the restrictions that led to the expectations, because women weren’t able to provide for themselves in certain ways for the longest time, so were railroaded into having to seek out a ‘provider’. Single mothers, stigma, can’t have a bank account, aren’t allowed to have the same opportunities in employment, voting and rights generally. And this is where I guess it wasn’t really as easy and straightforward as they might have wanted it. Because women weren’t content to just have to wait for a man, or be owned by their husband, or need a male signatory to do anything financial, so made a certain amount of fuss about it. Once grown up and into the adult world, it seems an odd way of trying in infantilise and belittle women, but it seems it was felt.
Keep them in place by legal means, because otherwise they would want to have similar freedoms and options, and what then? Might men have to up their game, and not rely on it being a necessity to have a partner? Because even after things got better, and women were given the same ‘freedoms’ financially, they switched it up a bit and made it so that one income wasn’t enough, so you can have freedom, but not for very long. Everybody in the family ends up working, and both people become dependent on each other. Then they have children, and that is a financial burden many now can’t face, but that’s ok, the government had an idea. Rather than make life affordable for people and families, they gave hand-outs to help you make ends meet. Instead, it just makes more dependent on the state, keeping them in the never-ending cycle of time and money, taxes and top ups.
But back to digging for gold, because the goalposts have changed there too haven’t they? Not just because there appears to be more pots to dig around in, of varying size, but because there are new ways for women to provide for themselves. Well, not new, but a new version of it. I guess the nicest way I can put it, is prostituting themselves online for money. OnlyFans and sites of that nature, I hear the name a lot these days, and kind of chuckle to myself a bit, thinking back to the days of top shelf mags and seedy looking shops with covered up windows. How the industry was always there, but a bit more lurking in the background, and also had shame and stigma attached to it funnily enough. Yet these days, it’s a strange thing to see it encouraged by ‘the media’ as empowering, and it shows women are taking control of their lives. I see something different however, and it seems more like some women taking advantage of an available way to be in control of their own income, using what I guess they see as skills and assets, and technically that is correct. It’s another way in modern society to pay your way, and as it’s not just for women, you could say there is equality there too. So, you can make you own pot of the gold these days, without having to dig someone else’s, but the tools are still the same aren’t they?
It’s the restrictions that are different, which in turn push through changes within the set up. The ripple effect but with people, families and society, felt over a couple of generations yet not entirely noticed. Subtle changes to the way people are allowed to manoeuvre through their lives, creating obstacles and hoops for everybody with your schedule set from birth to death now it would seem. Nursery, school, higher education, work, more work, your place in society set up for you and around you as you grow. And if you try and work your way round it, they change it, or now and again they let a few slip through the net and leave them to have a peaceful uninterrupted life. Everybody else is gradually trapped in the drama and contrived set-up of society, mentally at first, and then physically as they get to you. So, where we find ourselves now, in this modern fast-moving scene with everything at our fingertips, more options that we have ever had before and people scrabbling over a few pence thrown down from the upper echelons. Thinking it seems as though this is a new gold rush, technology being the facilitator making people digital money, but for what? Wanting you to want to be rich, when they hold the keys to how much you can have so you never actually will be. Or is it because so many people have now seen through the strange orchestrated moves they make to screw people over and make it harder? Who knows, I suspect they don’t care as they know we are so involved that we don’t know how to walk away. So, while it may seem that it’s just wealth and richness people are wanting when they dig for that gold, I now see it as sometimes they are just digging for freedom, away from the obstacles and restrictions that have been constructed around us from the day we were born. But like Truman in the film The Truman Show knowing something really isn’t right and yet being like the patients in One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest, because even though we know that we know, we all still kind of choose to be here…

(c) K Wicks
I think about dragons every now and then, and the fact there is some kind of legend or myth about them across most continents. So, like the other articles Giants, Fairy Tales and Myths, Monsters & Legends, I try to piece together what it is about it that makes me thinks there is something to it. It was particularly the fire breathing aspect that I kept mulling over, because we have lizards today which almost fit the bill, small ones with flaps of skin looking like wings, large heavy set lumbering ones without any form of wings. But while discussing the phoenix the other day, and descriptions of it bursting into flames, I thought of a fire breathing dragon. Then I thought of a few other mythological creatures that seemed similar once I lined them up in my head. And when put together as below, you can see why I thought of all of them all in turn.

Phoenix – a magnificent creature that was a symbol of renewal and rebirth.
Sphinx – mythical creature with the head of a human, the body of a lion, and the wings of an eagle.
Griffin – mythical creature known as a half-eagle, half-lion.
Chimera – a monstrous fire-breathing hybrid creature, composed of different animal parts.
Dragons feature in all sorts of stories though, Archangel Michael slaying a dragon, St George known for the same. Each of the ancient stories and fantastical tales featuring a winged creature, that had the ability to kill you on the spot or some great power to overcome and defeat.


Another came to mind based on its description, although the visual portrayal I had for this myself was from a movie, so didn’t fit until I gave more thought to the aspect of serpents in all these stories. Medusa being the most ‘famous’ of these I believe.
Gorgons – snakes for hair, wings, claws, tusks, and scales.
If we did happen to find any remnants of things like that today, we might think they looked like dinosaurs or pterodactyls perhaps, or just a plain old snake or bird – or a snake eating a bird, if you have both in the same fossil. Maybe. I know it sounds like reaching a bit, but I like to consider all options. So of course, they really could just be fantastical and outrageous stories we like to retell and pass down through the ages. For no reason other than to entertain it would seem, and to make us think of a time that never was. Or, there is the far-fetched possibility that we really did have a more fantastical time that came before, and something they haven’t been able to get rid of, so rewrite them instead, giving them different names and meaning, scattering the truth to the far-flung corners of the earth for it to be diluted and lost. Until such time of course, that it comes back, as truth often does…

(c) K Wicks
There are scatterings of the old world throughout the lands and even submerged off coastlines. Relics, buildings, monuments and rather grand things to show we missed quite a spectacular time. These are what are being called Tartarian currently, to represent grand things of a time past. It is mentioned on maps and was known as a region, now covering Russia, China and lots of Europe. As the range of photographs from the 1800’s and early 1900’s show, they are all over, and the buildings we have left to speculate on about their true nature, show a grandness and beauty we are simply not capable of today. Or it would appear that way with our modernistic, square and unflattering building techniques. Very much built not to last, or look good in any way, often barely even functioning for its purpose.
In the last 100 years or so, many of these old unique buildings and monuments have been destroyed, burnt, bombed and demolished – throughout various countries. Some of them strangely not long after construction apparently. World fairs being a classic example of build something grand and disposable, quickly at great cost, then tear it down. Although some of the ‘temporary features’ built still stand today. But we lost the skills of that time it would seem. And world wars seemed to have served as a great cover to get rid of others that would have been noticed and probably stopped otherwise. Ancient, not so ancient and modern alike, sweep and clear missions hold no regard for what has come before.
And of those previous skills, I still find it difficult to get my head around there being enough skilled craftsman, and materials available to find their way to every continent, and multiple countries to build all these architectural masterpieces within what seems to be a relatively short time frame. The similarities are striking. Post offices, city halls, asylums, schools etc. Seemingly way too large for the communities and infrastructure of the towns at that time. Dirt roads and pillared giant neoclassical buildings, for a population of only a few hundred in some cases, or less. Where we are also led to believe people were rather illiterate, and didn’t get pushed into formal education until early 1900s. Someone was writing a lot of letters, or there was a great need for shipping things around small towns though for there to be so many massive post offices. And a big need for overly large buildings, and somewhere to house all the people deemed crazy or unfit for their new society rolling out. Maybe I’m missing something there.
The other rather splendid buildings we have, which are earlier it is said and we also have plenty of, are churches and cathedrals. So even further back, less people because of all the plagues and wars, yet grand building projects requiring money, time, people, skills, construction etc. Seems to defy belief really when you really think it through. Or maybe it’s just the timeline I have been taught doesn’t quite add up, thinking we had Romans building great things, then the skills just disappeared for a few hundred years during some ‘dark ages’, followed by peasants and medieval Europe, the crusades etc. Leading us to believe people again were just poor and busy trying to live, with skirmishes, revolutions, wars and religious domination also occurring. The 1493 papal decree, the inquisition, the church of England split and the war on monasteries. Oh, and chuck in some plagues, huge fires engulfing entire cities, invasions, fall of empires etc. Just seems like what we see, and what we are told don’t quite match up. And we must have had great numbers of people to keep losing millions, every decade and century to what we would call ‘an untimely end’.
When you realise potentially lots of people have been deliberately removed, from either society or the records, it would be much easier to retell it as you want it remembered. Because you would want a certain version of events to be carried down, the chosen history to be taught and retold. Usually children would be very important to that, and being separated from their parents of course, makes this much easier. Funnily enough, there was a fair amount of movement of that nature in the 1800 and 1900s. Check out my article A Train Of Thought for more on that. But again, many countries and continents have moved a great number of children under the guise of for your ‘safety & health’, or for just plain old social experiments or excuses for ‘education’, displacing natives and trying to eliminate cultures, language and traditions that way. It’s a tried and tested method, still going on today unfortunately.
So, given what we know of how those who control society behave, and their methods and motives for things, I find it easy to understand why they wouldn’t want beautifully crafted buildings around to remind people of what came before. Also, whether they are a representation of a mysterious time or not, they are of a previous time and mindset, and one they don’t want people having anymore. To start over, you need to get rid of what came before. And people can be very good at remembering, but only if they actually knew in the first place…

(c) K Wicks