I gave more thought to the set up of marriage as an institution. With its rules of play having shaped much of society, relationships, and, therefore, the family structure. And because there are lots of changes afoot, people talk of a simpler time. Before the ‘nuclear’ family and household was, for want of a better term, blown up. But even that does not appear to be what we thought it was. Basing the ideal of it around our present rules and laws.

And these days, the news is pretty constant about sexual crimes, quite disgusting and abhorrent crimes, littering the news. So, one must consider the mentality of what feeds into that and the social landscape that facilitates it. Or, in the current case, imports it, pays for it, and pretends to ignore it. Something to Consider discussing certain angles on that. And I can see why people might look back to what appeared to be a more ordered time when it came to being ‘catered for’ by society.

A few points of interest around this subject I think are relevant –

Age of consent – in the UK between 1275 and 1875 it was 12, as talked about in my article A Prime Choice. Where it seems outrageous to us now, but was made normal in law for 600 hundred years, and I would have thought took a certain amount of adjustments to change that mindset. If they ever did.

Restrictions of finances – from 1882, women were allowed to own their own earnings and property, but not until 1975 were they allowed to apply for bank accounts, loans or mortgages without their husbands signature, therefore his authority was required until then. It still wasn’t until 1990 in the UK that married women were then allowed to do their own tax returns.

Italy – rules about marrying your rapist didn’t change until 1981. This one is crazy, and I was shocked to learn that it was their tradition. To make a victim marry their rapist in order to restore ‘honour’ to the family and society. Not until 1965 did someone upset that apple cart and refuse to marry their attacker. It caused quite a stir and eventually led to a change in the law around that, as you can see, that still took sixteen years to happen.

UK – until 1991, rape couldn’t exist within marriage because a wife wasn’t allowed to say no. The law had already said yes.

So, it does seem quite odd to seek to add to the population of the UK, but with those of a mentality more aligned with our previous times. But without the manners, etiquette, or civility that was made to go along with our ‘Victorian’ attitudes. Which, all in all, can not help but play a part in Leading to a State of Mind and state of society. As well as perhaps all the other vices that have been introduced and made so readily available. More Than Pain Gets Killed and Robotic Affection being just two ideas of things may be adding an extra layer of suppression or confusion.

With both conditioning and ‘entertainment’ having already paved the way for much of it, and Social Status and stigmas being used to reinforce much else, there are even stranger mentalities to contend with it seems than ever before. At all levels of society and with a will to rule over others. It really does seem as though we are the whim of madmen and mercenaries, and from what we apparently know of the past, we always were…

(c) MKW Publishing

A reading of my article – Just Under Your Feet

(c) MKW Publishing

The Matrix. A construct and all about ‘getting out’, knowing the illusion, so you can break away from it. But that ‘out’ seemed to end up being a bland and miserable existence, fighting for survival and a heavy struggle with reality, it seemed. I have delved into the concepts and angles of that movie already in my articles If You Die in the Matrix and What If I Told You.

But I wondered on the whole idea of The Matrix, initially thinking like most people it was a clever story to make people question ‘the system’, of making you ‘aware’ of the tricks and traps of that system to keep you ‘asleep’. And well, because everything appears inverted these days, I thought of it being part of how to trap you mentally, rather than to ‘free your mind’, as the saying went.

I’ll start with the main characters that are of note and how they seem to me now, based purely on their names and roles. Because I don’t imagine them all being separate characters anymore, looking for ‘The One’ who can save humanity. They are all part of the same ‘person’ and are the different aspects of the brain and what we have called consciousness and awareness who is, in fact, trying to save (or find) themselves.

Neo = Neocortex

Trinity = The Holy Trinity, Mind, Body & Soul

Morpheus = The God of Dreams

Now, the neocortex it is said, is “responsible for high-level functions like cognition, language, sensory perception, and motor commands. Comprising about 80% of the human brain.”

Without that, without Neo, working it all out or even knowing you need to, seems tricky, so I can see why it and he is so important in the story. But it turns out, it isn’t anything without Trinity, to accept ‘oneness’ by being two and then consciousness comes fully to life. And Morpheus is necessary for the overview of ideas and knowledge. Like the human brain seems to require, your subconscious, your mind, body and soul, as well as your ‘dream state experiences’ waking self’, are an essential combination.

The Architect = Man made God / Consciousness

The Oracle = Awareness / Intuition

Two other rather important characters, although they had minimal screen time, but what they were and represented lingered as a running background theme. Insight, predictions, questioning and choices. Neo utilising them to try and understand his purpose, his place and the bigger picture of humanity or what he thinks it is. Part of the philosophical reasoning we have as people, to wonder how and why, where and who, but played out in a visually stunning 3D adventure as a movie. Just as some people might do in their mind, as speculated in Hyperphantasia, A Down Side. And as we try to define reality, what it is and what it means, I keep coming back to a clever quote from Dumbledore in the HP series – “Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?”.

Our perceivable reality is created and projected from within our minds we are told, so it really does seem like a good question, why wouldn’t it be real? If it is only something we can see outside of us, or touch that is defined as real, then feelings have no place in reality you would think. Or thoughts and ideas, or anything without what we would call physical substance or matter, yet they are there and are experienced, and appear to be the driving force in our progression as a species. But what is in mind does seem to be rather of interest currently, as discussed in Chipping Away, In Your Head and perhaps crosses over into A Telekinetic Idea, where they are looking for something, wanting something they can’t get at yet. Maybe Morpheus was right and we are indeed in a war for our minds…

(c) MKW Publishing

A reading of my article – A Visual Deception

(c) MKW Publishing

A reading of my article – Choose Your Thoughts Wisely

(c) MKW Publishing