I happened across the history (or at least part history) of Benin, in Nigeria. It is said it was once a magnificent huge city, with wealth, structure and millions of inhabitants. Bronze was the main metal in use for wondrous sculptures and artifacts. Pictures of these are around today, because of relics stolen in past times being given back. That’s what led me to it, and to want to read more. I’ll mention the other piece of ‘evidence’ that made me want to know more. A letter, written by an englishmen in 1955, referring back to 1897, when the British arrived in Benin. It painted a horrific picture of what they arrived to, making it sound like the predator alter in the movie – part of that letter below, but with the extra line the internet one I saw omitted at the time, clearly outlining how that particular practice came to be. In fact, the entire ten page letter is an interesting read.
It seems that after that 1485 visit, missionaries were sent thereafter. Sounds familiar doesn’t it. And can be said of many of the great cities of the past, in Africa, South America, and places we don’t even know of because it has been so neatly covered over and forgotten, and not by accident in many cases. Where land grabs and changes of rulership happened, previous kings and emperors being coerced into agreements, people being made to play along or given incentives, sometimes torture and death was needed to help to ‘convince’ them it seems. In the above case, the letter goes onto detail how much that particular kingdom was diminished, and how they had to bargin and negotiate with ‘government’ after that for land, resources and what appeared to be a type of freedom. Slowly it changes into what we see today, with the story being that the rest of the great city was actually destroyed by the British in 1897, and people had to flee. Each continent has had its fair share of strife, people movement and invasions, back and forth with something being gained by someone each time, and great losses and displacement on the ground, so this isn’t a unique story, but interesting to me none-the-less.
Kill switches – probably not just for cars. If they have worked out how to install a chip into a human’s circuitry which they apparently have with brain chips, then they surely would have thought of a handy mechanism to be able to switch it off. Like the cars and machinery, we’ll be subject to the same limitations. Seeming more and more like logans run every day, because with a ‘kill switch’ comes the ability to decide when someone needs to expire, in their view. Suddenly seems easier to imagine how they could limit everyone to 30 years doesn’t it?
Also, if you have a chip, or something say, magnetic implanted, maybe that’s how people could be kept in ‘smart cities’. There will be a physical barrier you cannot cross or your implant explodes, or could just simply hold you there. Sounds like nightmare science fiction, but is it really fiction?
There was talk at the beginning of the mrna drive, that there would be chips or devices implanted via the vaccines. A few people shared apparent videos of Bluetooth ID’S showing up on people after jabs, and magnetic capabilities at the injection site. Whether real or not I followed the thought .
What if the purpose of it, if real, is to firstly monitor everyone. Give people a ‘code’ on their first shot, then you can monitor each subject and each ‘upgrade’ they deliver with each shot. The fatalities are possibly where the system or host is not compatible with the technology being written in, or can’t adapt quick enough. So faulty, expires, dies. Others will be integrating it, and maybe they are looking for the ‘one’ who can withstand the technology implants fully, to really create a fully functioning cyborg. If they haven’t already.
There is also the possibly of using the signal to that code for other purposes, or there may be other programmes running in different people, like a set of instructions, but not the same for all. And with that maybe, you could control/trigger vast numbers of seemingly unconnected people to behave in a certain way of the programmers or controller’s choosing.
Example – rage. I will use a movie reference here again, 28 Days Later. The reason I think of it isn’t because of a zombie in the normal sense, covered in my article Zombies, perhaps? But more along the lines of how that film presented it, as a virus (as did Resident Evil). But recently I saw an article about how some scientists ‘accidently’ turned some hamsters into angry rage filled creatures by doing some gene editing. And well, these recent gene therapies being masqueraded as vaccines could well be editing in something they apparently did not foresee. Or did, who can be sure.
But if you can activate a large group or multiple individuals at once, and control say, anger, or fear, or confusion at the flick of a switch, what exactly could be done with that? Give it thought, because they will have. And some videos are emerging currently of people having what can only be described as a weird episode, before they appear to fall to the floor in a type of rigor mortis type state. It could be they are suddenly aware of the system editing taking place, they hear/see things, and then short circuit. Who knows, it’s a thought in progress so I’m still working on that theory. Or the videos may just be further fear propaganda, either way, both options are being considered and I will continue to give thought to what appears to be going on. Technology is not being used as an ally here, and we would do well to remember it.
It’s been a barrage of psychological techniques and manipulations to achieve desired outcomes. But let’s look at who that was and what those desired outcomes were because this isn’t just theory, this was used against people in their everyday lives.
As this whole lockdown debacle started, it was noted on a few posts online that there was a document going round which appeared to show a psychological strategy for, well, to put it plainly, scaring the shit out of people. That’s the non-technical term for it, they called it a ‘Nudge Unit’. A team of behavioural scientists and specialists who were tasked with working out how to turn you against people, how to manipulate your feelings with the use of wording and incentives. You might have heard of them, part of the Independent Sage group they were, also in that group was Neil Ferguson, famous for being wrong on many occasion spanning decades, yet his projections were used as the basis for much of the societal procedures that were followed. But the people behind the behaviour, ones like Susan Michie being put forward as the face of reason, despite heavy ties to communism and the CCP’s way of thinking. It should have been clear for many to see, that these people did not have ours, or societies best interests at heart. That all these groups usually tie back to the overall industries and foundations that fund them, that fund getting a certain message across. Fear and compliance. I covered some of the techniques used in The three D’s of conversion under coercion but it’s more than that.
Those people, and other government departments sat down and deliberately decided to instil fear in people, whether it was necessary or not. A cruel and continuous process of heaping mental pressure and stress on them, knowing many wouldn’t cope, deliberately splitting up families, letting people die alone just so they could get their ‘desired result’. Fear and compliance. Because it is much easier to blindside people and lead them astray when they are frightened or worried. But still it is an engineered response. Decide what you want to happen, then place triggers and reminders to condition people to accept that outcome, the one you have chosen for them. Like I said, cruel.
And the repercussions of which we are now witnessing. With countless vaccine injuries, more mental health issues for people, grief of not seeing loved ones in the final days or months, economic impact, all still happening with more being piled on every day. Food crisis, money collapsing, new viruses, war. It’s sounds ridiculous, doesn’t it? And it is, because it’s meant to be so outrageous and overwhelming, that you won’t have time to take it all in. They want you to be pulled this way and that, to not know what’s coming next, to not relax and gather yourself. Headless chickens are what they want. There is a saying I have thought of often in this, the first line from Rudyard Kipling’s If,
“If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs and blaming it on you…”
When discussing some of the mainstream ‘conspiracy theories’ it comes up now and again about how could everybody be in on it when it comes to it being kept under wraps by so many. And it does seem like a big ask, to just think that millions of people are in on it, keeping this really big secret to themselves and actively making sure others don’t find out. There are ones who know, and ones who can’t know, but I see it as remarkably easy to get lots of people on board with an idea, and then run with it.
As the famous quote by Joseph Goebbelsgoes “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie.”
Example, I’ll use the flat earth/round earth theory/debate for this (discussed already slightly in my article Flat or Round? Keeping in mind this works for both scenarios of convincing of a flat or round surface, whichever you want to be the outcome, or indeed whatever the lie. At the start of the education system or involved industry being rolled out (curriculum, space agencies, security departments etc), you decide what to teach the top professor/ leader in their field. They then teach that to others, and so on. That’s how ‘normal’ things are put into the mainstream and a constant stream of regurgitation of the same information is had. Passed on for generations as truth and fact, as they have been taught it, until they decide to accept that new information is allowed. And equally if you wanted to disrupt or corrupt knowledge, you could do it using the same model.
There are also little things along the way to nudge it into place. Create maps to fit the picture you are painting, make the maths fit, as once you have your answer to start, you can work your way back for the formula. Start things being computerised, then you can program in whatever you want, as long as the people reading it see what they are meant to, or read them as they have been taught to. Everything can be put in place in give the illusion of a much more limited earth. ‘The world just got smaller’ they said. And maybe it did, because it was suddenly limited to us by way of an ‘Antarctic treaty’ where everyone just agreed to leave that bit and just do science on a really small, limited and restricted scale. Have to say I don’t believe that cover story at all.
With the crater earth theory, it is said to be both flat and round, as we are a flat surface within a crater – hence sea level, and the bigger planet we are part of is round, and vaster than we can imagine. With the other craters representing the other ‘planets’. So, when other life forms and aliens are discussed, they don’t mean from outer space. They mean from ‘over there’. Same with Mars missions and all the ‘space’ expenditure, it is said it’s used to try and get out of this crater, because although we say there are other craters, apparently, we are trapped in this one. I am still on the fence with that one, but interested all the same. But what if everybody knew there was more, and it was bigger, it would change the playing field a bit wouldn’t it?
It also seems to me that available maps are plentiful of what the other ‘bigger earth’ looks like, maths have been calculated and models made to predict movements of the sun and moon. Just as tidy as all the other information we have been given for the globe earth. Just lacking pictures to back it up, but I’m sure photoshop and CGI will catch up there. And for the images we have to prove the globe earth, one could speculate the use of a round lens, round telescopes, rounded glass etc, which can create the image being rounded, or fisheye as they dubbed it. Funny how they claim maps were just wrong from hundreds of years ago which shows water distribution being very different. Yet parts are extremely accurate, even to this day, but they got half wrong? Maybe there is more to see there. And anyone who raises questions can be discredited, or laughed at, or cancelled. Literally. And some people don’t want to admit they’ve been fooled or could be, so won’t entertain the thought that someone lied and they could be deceived. That would be preposterous, they may say to themselves, and shut down any further thought of it. But sometimes to get the answer which may end up being fantastical, you have to entertain the outrageous, or the preposterous. That doesn’t mean accept it or go with it, but at least don’t dismiss it unnecessarily.
I think it also suits a purpose for both flat or round to be believed/disbelieved and for people to be busy trying to argue for and against. While we take time to focus on out there, we maybe aren’t giving in here our full attention. So, all of it could be complete fantasy and just pie in the sky, we do have everything figured out, all the answers to where we are and such. Sounds conveniently wrapped up, no more thinking to be done there, right? Well, to people like me, there is…
There have been stirs in the world of psychiatry recently, as well as the extended branch of it which is where the issue has arisen, the pharmaceutical area. A rather damning article, referencing a rather damning paper of evidence, published only last month – The chemical imbalance theory of depression is dead detailing these findings. Yet change is not that swift in the real world of medicine, not by a long shot. As of today, it is still clearly noted on the NHS website “It’s thought that SSRIs work by increasing serotonin levels in the brain”.
The fall-out from this on the ground though is what is important, not whether they can agree or not. It’s real people who have been living with difficulties for quite some time in some cases, taking medication that they are now hearing, may in fact be useless. And these medications are not without risk, the side effects leaflets are really quite scary. And speaking as someone who has taken them, and suffered side effects, I can attest to that. They were enough to make me stop taking them, and try and assess what it was in my life that was making me feel so unbalanced, or unstable, or emotional. Taking into account everything, not just cherry picking the bits that seemed to fit at the time. I wanted to feel on an even keel, and I never did while taking pharmaceutical medications. And also coming to learn with age, that many of those feelings were actually perfectly normal for the situation at hand, or the time of life I found myself in.
But it seems there is much being revealed of late about what the effects of all these drugs really are, aside from the actual known side effects. I have written about it slightly in my article Memory, covering painkillers, and have given thought over the years to it anyway. And it seems an odd thing, and has for a while, that you would expect your body to regulate and balance itself, while taking something that is fundamentally intefering with that, on an enhanced specialised chemical level no less.
Thoughts, thought processes and emotional impulses are all working together, most the time for most people anyway, and if you encounter an overload it can tip the balance and destabilise the system. I guess they believe by shutting down or dampening one of these systems, it can relieve the pressure as it were. And I get it, in theory the idea is sound. But it’s on the premise that we are all wired mentally the same, and we are all capable of dealing with said chemical changes, hence the prescriptions seems to be at an alarming rate these days. That is not the case, as we well know, with awful suicide rates and more mental illness being identified or labelled to deal with what they say is the rise in mental illness. And I don’t deny there is a problem, we have a weird, shitty, soulless world being constructed around us, with constant manipulation and mental intrusion. I would be worried if people weren’t dissatisfied with that and showing signs of struggling. Instead of coping mechanisms though, and assessing if people are meant to be treated this way, it seems ever important to blame people themselves, and demand they adapt to the ‘new world order’ that creeps its way into our psyche. As anyone would do who is trying to make them the centre feature of your life, trying to take all your attention, telling you you’ll never survive without them, trying to turn you against your friends and family. Sounds like a terribly abusive scenario doesn’t it? And what I have learnt along the way is that people don’t always recognise they are in it, because it makes it a bit easier to make excuses or just shy away from a painful truth. Imagine how much easier it would be for that abusive person if they were also able to convince you that you were mentally dysfunctional, and needing medicating. It would serve a purpose for them in the end, making people think they are in need of extra assistance that only one can give, to dismiss others who would ‘invalidate’ their condition.
We all have hard times in our lives, and I will never deny that things can happen that will take the rug from under you and change your whole life, traumatic things, hurtful things, shocking things. But these things will happen, to you, or to those you know. And imagine a world where there isn’t a doctor to just write a prescription, or a pharmacy to just cash it, what would you do? Grief, despair and heartache. Sadness, loss and fear. They are all feelings, and ones of life despite what they represent. You wouldn’t want to take something to stop you feeling happy and joyful, would you? We embrace certain feelings in life, and seem to shy away from or try to eliminate others, but they are necessary and character building as they say. And maybe it has been too much time now and too many people switched off those feeling for too long, and don’t know how to feel properly anymore. Maybe that was the point of all the drugs after all. Who can say for sure, but I will keep giving it thought.
Experience teaches you so much, perspectives and ideas change, you develop and change, and what you wanted of your life, will hopefully develop and change. It would be weird to think you were still the same person really from when you were a child or teenager through to being an adult who has perhaps already lived two lifetimes. Time is pivotal in that, without time, you aren’t able to really appreciate experiences I have found. When thrust from one scenario into another, whether it be a societal one, or a personal one, you can end up staggering mentally from one experience to another. It is only with time and reflection that I have managed to get meaning from those events and therefore actually benefitted from the experience.
So, how does that fit in with this fast-paced world around us, more, quicker, do it now, there won’t be time. I can’t help but think part of that is so that you won’t have time to experience things, they will pass you by so rapidly that there is no reflection period upon it and your brain will move onto the next stimulating thing to simulate experience, but a fast and unsatisfying version, that is ultimately unfulfilling. It is said we humans crave experience, so is it any wonder we have knowingly lapped up a virtual one they carefully ran alongside the real one. I wonder when the lines will become so blurred it will be hard for many to know the difference. But maybe we do deep down, because we can feel something isn’t quite right and there is a certain emptiness to it. Like a copy of a copy of a copy, it loses something of the original. Like whiskey that you just keep watering down, eventually it’s just a plain, boring glass of water with a hint of what it once was.
Much appears to be getting lost in the drive for everything to be faster and happen quicker. I remember wanting to be like that, when you’re a kid, and it seems to drag on forever, having to wait for so much. Until you’re tall enough, until you’re old enough – which encompasses a lot by itself.
“Life moves pretty fast, if you don’t stop to look around once in a while, you might miss it”, as the movie quote goes.
Trade, cash, and freedom. Three things very much under threat at the moment, and they are all part of the bigger picture we see around us. Cash perhaps was the very first monitoring tool used to enslave people, so it’s with a strange irony we fight for it. But right now, it seems the only link between the last vestige of what we knew as freedom and what is approaching for many. And I say for many, because I do not believe this is a one size fits all operation, however much they would like you to think so. Not all countries and people will be on board, can be on board or will be capable within this new augmented future they try so hard to shape. I speculated on this in my article There was always going to be two, because there are always those they consider ‘left behind’ and maybe they were just cutting their losses, maybe it was to get rid of the rogue element. You don’t want any ‘bad apples’ getting involved at a really deep level. We all know how damaging it can be to have someone bringing down the morale of everyone, or causing discord or perhaps exposing something that not everyone is supposed to see. It is sometimes simpler to just remove that person from the environment, and pretend they were never there. With the internet and censoring of information or as they have conveniently dubbed it ‘misinformation’, we have reached a new level of trying to shut the other side down. But that is because it’s a controlled environment, someone decides the platform, the type of interaction, the limitations, the ‘rules’, and so on.
But outside of that, in the real world and society, it is not as controlled, but oh, how they are trying to make it so. Take a moment if you will, to imagine the strict parameters of the internet and how it is set up, and then apply that to outside and things you might do in your everyday life. All of that, will be monitored, dictated, and controlled in the future that makes it way closer. They want you to be bio-monitored, so they can check your vitals to decide what meds you need, they want to then tell you what you are allowed to eat that day, and how many calories you are allowed. You are given compulsory exercise and work, all monitored. You aren’t allowed any unauthorised conversations or interactions. Only selected hobbies or ‘leisure time’ activities will be allocated. Sounds pretty horrific doesn’t it, but they openly show this as what they want for everyone with the digital ID linked to your health, finances, employment, beliefs etc. And if that wasn’t intrusive enough, they gleefully talk about implanting chips in people’s heads so that they can all be linked to a hive mind type of thing. Super creepy now, right? Covered slightly in my article The Hive, but even more scary when it’s a real concept, idea and being put into action. Not just fiction anymore, this shit just got very real.
At the moment though, the ability to trade amongst yourselves, and use of cash cannot be overstated enough how important that is, because while you are able to still use it, they can’t monitor you and your purchases or control you yet. I already realised years ago that all these rules and regulations and red tape that slowly crept into every area of life, was going to come to a head eventually and would become more restrictive. That people would finally notice they weren’t allowed to do things anymore without someone saying you can, bit like Simon says. Can I build here please? Can I fish there please? Can I earn money please? Can I have food please? They’ve been playing the ‘parent’ for a really long time now, slowly making it harder for the normal things, making the hoops bigger and more of them to jump through, slowing down and clogging up the bureaucratic world they created, so they swoop in with a new, sleek, streamlined version. But do not be fooled, it is just a further play towards full mental enslavement if you will and them being at the helm of your wants, dreams, desires, fears and emotions. They also seem rather obsessed with not just knowing what it is in your head, but of actually wanting to be inside it, while you are, feeling your emotions. Now that is maximum level creepy, and somewhat terrifying.
There was a certain character in Star Trek, next gen that I thought of, Data. If you are familiar with the show hopefully you know to what I refer. His emotion chip, and how much havoc it caused within his programming and with his strange android desire to be human. I wonder if they have switched up the setting. Do they want to put chips in our heads to dampen or control emotions, and perhaps make us more android like? Who can say for sure, all we know is they want to do it, the true reason for it is being left to speculate upon for now.
“Migrants are used as weaponised fodder in the process of transforming Western societies. They too, will suffer from the ‘transition’ to a more Totalitarian structure”
And something came back to me I had thought of previously, about warfare and tactics. Little things that get pieced together.
Scotland – previously hearing about the victories of Scotland, before they were plundered by rules, regulations and laws like the rest of us, but we are led to believe that back in the day (not sure exactly when), they couldn’t take Scotland because of its rugged landscape, and the inhabitants’ tendency to know the land better than the invaders, and be able to evade them, or through strategy outwit them, outlast them and the use of guerrilla tactics.
Vietnam – Same as above, keeping the enemy on the backfoot and utilising the landscape.
So, with that in mind, wouldn’t it suit a double purpose to be able to displace an awful lot of people from various regions? You get two birds with one stone, because while they are leaving their own lands and familiar territory, someone else is eyeing it up. Then they encourage you to relocate to the unfamiliar, which destabilises that area once they arrive in such large numbers, which also makes it difficult for the locals to be able to group and make the best of their area or resources. Make no mistake, we are in the biggest land grab, people grab and resources grab we have ever known, and it seems the future looks rather precarious right now, so if we leave it in the hands of those who are pulling the strings, it won’t be much of a future for any of us…
I’ve already pointed out how the conveyor of consumerism is now putting us as the product in my article Mark of the Beast. But I started reading an interesting book from the 50’s that was recommended to me and would like to delve further into the concept around it and the marketing of it.
The Hidden Persuaders, by Vance Packard. He’s the author who wrote that special book I refer to a lot, The People Shapers. So thought it was about time I read this one too. It’s about marketing, more specifically the techniques and strategies used since the 50’s to convince us to buy things. Which then took on a new role for many other areas as well, helping to shape how we are today as a society. Although this book is about the US, it can be applied to here as well. I’m only two chapters in, and it’s gold. Covering the use of mass psychoanalysis to guide heavily funded research and campaigns. Within the commercial landscape initially and then increasingly in the political one. I’ll share some key phrases with you.
“What the probers are looking for, of course, are the whys of our behaviour, so that they can more effectively manipulate our habits and choices in their favour”
Very quickly after that line, he mentions it moving from the “genial world of James Turber into the chilling world of George Orwell and his Big Brother”. Indeed, he is correct about that, as we see around us today and especially with that particular book being mentioned a lot. But this next sentence stands out to me
“Another aspect of people’s behaviour that troubled marketers is that they are too easily satisfied with what they already have”.
They were concerned that although business was booming across the board it couldn’t be sustained unless you put more pressure on everyday Americans to consume more. In a 1955 Christianity and Crisis publication they stated
“The dynamics of an ever-expanding system require that we be ‘persuaded to consume to meet the needs of the productive process’.”
So, with over-production threatening, they turned their attention, not to that they might be making to much, no, it was that the people were buying too little. Funny and tragic all at once really. With billions being poured into marketing, the phrase ‘We don’t sell lipstick, we buy customers’ came about. People became a bigger commodity then I realise. But their biggest hurdle it seems at first was that after a time, most people really did have what they need. And if the products were any good, shouldn’t need replacing every year. So, what to do. They went for the idea of creating ‘psychological obsolescence’ to make people feel dissatisfied with what they have and want new. I wonder whether this is how that saying ‘keeping up with the Jones’s’ came from. To encourage you to covet what someone else has, to think they have more, or better and that you too should have it. That’s really raged out of control now, hasn’t it?
We know they use whatever trick they can to get us to buy things, but it isn’t just about the bottom line, or money. It seems to be about controlling the way you think as with an awful lot these days. Bit more sinister than just ‘buy my stuff’ isn’t it?
“Every day I am forced to watch the same horror movie about people clamouring for lethal jabs while unaware of the bodies piling up everywhere. Pharma-media propaganda & censorship is so powerful that it can lead people to be complicit in their own demise.” – Pierre Kory MD MPA
Scary isn’t it. For the people watching, and even more so I should imagine for the people who took part in the experimental trial. Although we were all part of the psychological experiment, some of us rather unwilling participants, and others were easily led into handing over their health, safety and sense of security to unknown external forces. It was hard to watch unfold then, knowing where it would lead. But most of that was speculation and was covered from a certain angle in my article Who really knows where it goes, but now we are actually seeing it. What many will dismiss, or don’t want to talk about, but the fallout from this, and one I speculated would occur based on everything I had thought through and discovered. Just as with the mental overload of recent time, a psychological cascade event happened within people’s minds, I theorised that these jabs were programmed to cause a cascade event within your immune system. To crash, replicate and override the current system in place. Because the people who talk of finance and introduce these things, seem rather obsessed with programming, technology and AI. We seem rather outdated to them, and they tell us so.
But the desensitisation of people to a certain extent must be complete, because while they were horrified apparently at video footage of people dropping dead abroad which was used to gather support for lockdown, they seem rather unconcerned about people doing it on live television, or weekly now at sporting events (if not daily). There is also the VAERS reporting yellow card system which was always a marker for concern. Now we have various groups set up across all forms of social media, videos, testimonies, interview, coroners reports, death certificates. Yet nothing. No shock, fear and concern that something is going on after all, just not what you thought. No. Instead, it seems complete mental shutdown, self-denial of the most spectacular proportions has occurred, and a denial of reality. Obliviousness of a new magnitude. That is what is terrifying.
But the ones who have realised that they made a mistake, and a rather big one, are also being overlooked and dismissed in many cases. Ignored by many and gaslit by authorities, adding to their plight. I did suspect they would do that, either to pretend it didn’t happen or to blame the injured for their own injury. “Well, it was your decision, nobody made you do it”. And to a point, that is correct, nobody made them do it, but they were heavily encouraged, coerced, blackmailed and downright lied to in a bid to convince them. So, yes, they were grossly mis-informed, but they thought they had the right information at the time, and unfortunately, listened to the wrong people. Because there were two sides, us ‘crazy’ folk on one side, who seemed wildly hell bent on not going along with the regime, and the other side. The ones who just kept moseying on through and wanting to believe the government and institutions there to ‘protect’ us, were the ones telling the truth. Well, time has told on that one, and now we know for sure who was right.
They are backtracking on data, charts and outcomes. Admitting those ‘crazy’ people were in fact correct on many points all along. Even paying out compensation for said vaccine injuries. Yet, still going ahead with the ridiculousness, as if they are so far gone, they just can’t let it go. They want their digital ID system, they want you hooked up to a central Monitoring system where they can control you and decide what’s best for you. And when I say hook up, I don’t mean in the traditional sense, where you plug in and out like these days. You can still put your phone down and walk away at this point. It is more integration they are looking for, to literally overwrite your current functioning systems, with something new and constantly being watched, monitored, cajoled, herded and ultimately harvested. Whether it be your personal data, your time, your organs, your brain mechanics, your family, your money, your life – they want you, what you are and what you have. And I look around and wonder, did those things really mean so little to so many people in the first place, that they didn’t even recognise that’s what was being taken from them? Or did they just work out what really was at stake when they handed over their mind, body and soul. The whole package for someone else to manipulate, control and benefit from. Disturbing. Especially when you realise when they say ‘what’s best for you’ is the same as ‘for your safety’. It’s for them, for their needs and what’s best for them, and you are either the means to that, or in the way of that, and are being treated accordingly. Best to know which one you are viewed as, and then indeed, act accordingly…
MKW Publishing 