If you wanted to hide something, a really big dastardly plan, then people say you wouldn’t tell everyone about it. You might know the one I refer to, the big one, the openly talked about ‘conspiracy theory’ of the depopulation agenda. Many think it’s fantasy, but the idea is not new, and it’s not secret so certainly not conspiracy. But what some overlook, is that they haven’t in any way tried to hide the idea, why would they? It’s possibly required that people need to know in order for it to work and gather steam. But maybe it was the implementation of the ideas that was to be murky, and non-descript, and confusing. So that people on the ground wouldn’t piece together the bigger picture, or work out how the small things were playing their part as they happened at the time.

But there are plans and have been discussions surrounding the world’s population density and what can be done to control it, or get it in hand in some way. I’ll use one that springs to mind.

Apparently this isn’t how it sounds from Mr Gates, and has been misconstrued. But ask yourself this, how exactly did he think he would lower it by 10-15% while at the same time improving everybody’s health and environment, therefore breeding conditions? I wonder.

“First, we’ve got population,” he said during the talk organized by TED, a non-profit organization devoted to spreading ideas. “The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent. But there, we see an increase of about 1.3.”

One of the recently deceased royals, Prince Philip was quoted as saying in 1988.

“In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, to contribute something to solving overpopulation.”

Two ways in my mind you achieve lowering, either sterilisation, therefore knowing it can’t increase further, or extermination programs. Neither one seems very people friendly, does it? Lowering population means to stop breeding, or to kill off some people. Or both. Maybe I missed something there that was obvious to others but that is what I took from it. Maybe that’s why they want to dictate birth control, abortions, and breeding generally. Switching the rhetoric from ‘depopulation’ to ‘overpopulation’. Because it sounds a lot more user friendly to sound like you are halting the numbers, rather than culling the numbers. And when it comes to influencing and convincing people to go along with things, they have useful tools at hand. See my article Conversion, can work both ways.

But if you wanted to hide some big losses in work forces and society if you go for the culling method, it would be necessary to disrupt those industries and workplaces. Otherwise, lots of people suddenly taking sick or dying would be very noticeable and people might see. But if you had lots of strikes, restrictions, mass sackings, lots of changes, lockdowns, financial issues etc, then it struck me how much easier it becomes to hide the overall losses. Keeping everyone moving around and not having anywhere near the same routine they used to have. Work from home, 15-minute cities and zones popping up, shop online. All big changes to lots of people, but also means you see less people initially, meaning how would you know if any or a few were missing. And if you did, who would listen?

And when certain industries seem at breaking point, they can blame the strikes, the economy, the people. But all were instigated at the hands of the planners, the people Shapers, knowing what would ensue. With so many areas failing at once, the pressure and stress within each industry, I guess they expect the domino effect to then occur. Each collapsing under its own confusion and instability, causing a chain reaction with others to follow. Or it would seem that is what’s expected, although not quite coming to pass. Whether it’s just the plan isn’t working, has stalled a bit, or the people are showing more resilience than predicted, I’m not sure yet, we’ll have to see…

(c) K Wicks

They have been laying them for quite some time. As you might lay machinery under the ground, waiting for what appears to be a bolt of lightning to activate them and let them rise up and take shape. But what if that ‘machinery’ wasn’t clunky metal as we might know it or think of it, but what if it was thoughts, ideas and scenarios. Activating a mechanism of imagery and fear to achieve a desired result. Many have talked of an alien invasion for years, of if there are aliens, are we alone in the universe and all that. Careers have been dedicated to them, special secret branches of government apparently allocated for it, books written, TV programs made, and movies churned out whenever a reminder of an outside threat needs to be reinforced. I’ll mention the most classic one, and a benchmark in this project in my mind.

War of the Worlds. In all its forms, is quite a story. But it’s the radio show I’ll mainly refer to here, which was run as a Halloween special on October 30th 1938. And if the reactions to it are true, it had quite an impact, causing people to apparently believe that there was in fact an alien invasion taking place, and they were in fact, hearing it. I guess the imagination did the rest to accompany a compelling rendition of the tale. Was it a test run? To prime people’s thoughts for a later fear? In the late 1800’s there were many a horror and science fiction story going around, yet we are told many were illiterate around that time, so who were these books and stories really for? Was it always mean to be a continuous cycle of fictional invasions and doom, apparent wars thrown in here and there, and more and more ‘history’ of disaster, wars and death by way of huge catastrophe or external forces causing our destruction. Some of the films that spring to mind are

Imdependence Day – the obvious one I’m sure.

X-Files – the movie and the series in general, making the idea seems as plausible as possible.

Cloverfield – An odd film, but still one of grand visuals and lots of panic.

War of the World Film – makes an impact watching it for sure, and puts that extra fearful idea partially in mind. They were already here.

After that, there are many where it is localised invasion, or visitation or abduction. Various different ways for you to imagine your world and life being turned upside down by something that is so terrifying and strange, that you probably like to think you would always react like the people in the movies do. And run or fight back. But what of the movies where the enemy looks just like everyone else? People don’t always fight back, or even notice it’s their enemy until it’s too late. And maybe it suits a purpose for people to be worried about an unseen, unknown force that may or not even exist or ever be in their reality. Because while you are concerned and looking out for what appears to be an over-the-top entrance and announcement of doom and enslavement from an alien race, you don’t notice the quiet and stealthy approach for the same result, from your what appears to be your own.

(c) K Wicks

Many times we have been subject to experiments and tests, knowingly and unknowingly. Medical tests, exams, IQ tests, competitions and grades. But it would seem that while there are tests we see and know of, there are the ones we don’t. And the consequences and results of said tests and experiments can either have a big fall out, go undetected for years, or quite possibly never be revealed. When they are however, it can often go a long way towards understanding how we are viewed, and why it may serve you well to not trust those who pull the strings of society. At the start of this last few years though, it was stated quite clearly that this new drug to be rolled out, was in fact experimental, and only approved under emergency authorisation. That was the first part of the IQ test I guess, where people were openly told what was occurring, and wanted to take part. Then there was extra literature leaning towards the trial ending in 2023 and 2024 I think for a couple of the products, yet still people lined up and seemed to think it was fine, some even relishing the idea of taking part in a trial, to help forward scientific understanding and be part of ‘the cure’. Well, if you have watched I am Legend (or the original Omega Man), you will know how it all goes bad when the cure creates something far worse than the disease and destroys humanity. Just a thought.

And it’s interesting to me to listen to and watch a Dr Corbett discussing the questions surrounding the validity of viruses, and in particular HIV. Potentially in my mind, it is manufactured, and if exists was distributed amongst certain populations perhaps, so they could then use them for other tests. And to test more drugs, which often harm and have a high mortality in themselves. People handing themselves over for a slow and monitored death.

Factor8 scandal – blood scandal of the 80’s but happened in the 70’s and 80’s – where estimates say up to 6,000 people were ‘accidently’ infected with contaminated blood containing Hep c and HIV in some cases. And as a side note wiki says that during that time the NHS seem to have infected around 25,000 – 30,000 people with viruses by way of blood transfusions. Quite a staggering number, isn’t it? Would be even stranger if that blood was given out on purpose wouldn’t it, to get something synthetic circulating. But then you would know what to look for when testing for it perhaps, which is how you might track something, making sure it does what it is meant to. Maybe.

SV40 – “where millions of polio vaccines were distributed which happened to be contaminated with SV40 – From 1955 to 1963, an estimated 10-30% of polio vaccines administered in the US were contaminated with simian virus 40 (SV40). The virus came from monkey kidney cell cultures used to make polio vaccines at that time.” A simian virus that was known to cause cancers and tumours in mice. Another shocker when I first learned about it, again thinking of it from an accidental perspective, believing they could miss something like that, and just chalking it up to ‘the greatness of science makes some mistakes’. Foolish thinking I now believe. But it seems obvious when you delve a bit, that many of the ‘viruses’ that we apparently see that cross from animals to humans, is because we have been tinkering, testing, and mutating things ourselves, trying to circumvent nature in some cases. I always thought it odd we would have biolabs too, where we store and keep the most terrible pathogens, for you know, research. Boggles the mind, which is why I ended up giving it further thought and time.

These examples I reference are just a handful I know about, and there are a multitude from the US, with all their different projects and special files, but here are a few more from the UK, and why I find it so hard to believe, why others find it so hard to believe, that their government would harm them.

“Between 1953 and 1964 top secret trials were carried out using a chemical concoction of zinc cadmium sulphide to simulate how a cloud would disperse biological agents. The unsuspecting population was sprayed covertly with the poisonous compound at least 76 times.”- Cadmium spraying in UK – 1950’s

And we know the military have been using their own foot soldiers as a steady conveyor of guinea pigs for over a century now, strangely with the ‘Spanish Flu’ apparently originating in Ft. Riley in Kansas, and ‘Swine Flu’ also starting at a military base, Ft. Dix in Jersey in 1976. But they are at the helm of many of these ‘tests’ or ‘accidents’.

Nerve gas experiments on soldiers in the UK – “From 1945 to 1989, Porton exposed more than 3,400 human “guinea pigs” to nerve gas. It seems probable that Porton has tested more human subjects with nerve gas, for the longest period of time, than any other scientific establishment in the world” – The past Porton Down can’t hide

“A government report just released provides for the first time a comprehensive official history of Britain’s biological weapons trials between 1940 and 1979. Many of these tests involved releasing potentially dangerous chemicals and micro-organisms over vast swaths of the population without the public being told.” – Millions were in germ war tests, listing over 100 covert operations. Also interestingly in that article it says “The report reveals that military personnel were briefed to tell any ‘inquisitive inquirer’ the trials were part of research projects into weather and air pollution.”

So, I personally find it incredibly easy with the evidence so far presented and what I know, to believe that our government, and all governments, are hiding things from us, and do not have our best interests at heart. They have theirs at heart, and use strategy and safety as tools of control, and mechanisms of fear to keep their wheel of industry turning. With each little nut and bolt, every cog and gear playing their part to make it work. That’s probably why they want robots to replace people, or to roboticize the people they might need, because people as we are now, aren’t quite fitting the mould they have spent decades shaping us for, or we did, and now that purpose is done, they have a new mould to fill. So, we are surplus to requirement in their mind perhaps, but they need a way to ‘scale us back’ without it appearing as though they are, well not to everyone anyway. And of course, there is the option that it could all be a carefully crafted conspiracy, and they want you to think there was a plan that nefarious organisations are trying to coordinate a world takeover, because in real life things like that just don’t happen. Do they?

(c) K Wicks

We see it a lot these days, an entitled attitude from people, and to be fair it was always there, just not so obvious for a time, sort of. Because we have different levels of it, just as we have a class system, and ‘levels of society’. And let’s be honest, it starts from the top down. We have one family at the helm of our country, who ‘rule’ us, so I believe it begins there, going down through the levels until we see it has filtered through to most areas.

People think they are entitled to things, but let’s look at why that is. The definition of it being as follows –

“Entitlement – believing oneself to be inherently deserving of privileges or special treatment”.

And we’ve heard the word privilege enough recently with it being tacked on to a certain people of a pale complexion. But why is that? I always thought I was privileged to have been born and brought up in the UK, realising geographical location plays a massive part of who you end up being. Certain freedoms and opportunities didn’t seem as available for others, so I took that as being privileged. But there are others who have more, and less, on this same island. So, there are grades of privilege once you look beyond the personal aspect. Having a certain surname, or attending particular schools will afford you certain privileges, regardless of your character it would appear. So, I totally understand why people who are told they are privileged because they are white, may laugh a bit, and debate the point. The ‘working class’ have always been looked down on by what they call ‘higher orders’ of society in this country. Which is why it’s slightly bemusing that people try so hard to get elevated to those ‘upper ranks’. Where I guess you too become privileged and can then look down on others? Because it wouldn’t be to help others now, would it? Or that’s what they’ll say until they get there it seems.

But not many start at the bottom, genuinely at the bottom, and work their way up to any position of importance. The ones who are selected, under the pretext of being elected, start a foot or two ahead of others, and often then puts measures in place to ensure others get to go one step forward and two steps back. So where does this implied and followed set of hierarchical privileges stem from? And where does the apparent entitlement to them come in and how has it continued for so long? Now we see a general sense of entitlement has been filtered down to the normal folk of society. Is this so they can add more layers to the privilege cake? So that people will overlook the failings and ineptitude of those ‘privileged elite’ because you think you can get a step up near to it? I wonder.

But why do so many people think they are entitled? Because they have been told they are, without really questioning or understanding it perhaps. Missing the benefit to the ‘privileged elite’ of you believing you are entitled and acting as such. Making demands, waiting for your leg up or hand out, and casually falling for their trap. Because the system is rigged and we are all set up to fail unless you are already in the club. It just needs to look like an unknown makes it, or a rags to riches story to warm the heart and fuel the dreams they want you be distracted with. Or at least that’s how it appears on the ground when you really start to pull the thread. So tidy and neat on the face of it, but then a few holes, a couple of loose ends, and things that just don’t add up if you look beyond the smooth frontage of it all.

So, it suits their purpose for us to be stepping on each other, and scrabbling to get the bigger crumb they thrown down every now and then. Wanting you to want to be the crumb thrower, and not part of ‘the rabble’ pushing and shoving for crumbs. And while that occurs, they can breeze through and make their changes and adjustments to the world around you. And if you notice and start to have a problem with it, they tell you it’s you, you’re the problem. Or find a way to rid themselves of that problem, or to program it out of people using laws, rules, medications, education etc.

They can never really quite factor in all the variables though. Despite the determined consistencies, there will always be the ‘rogue element’ that persists in disrupting the perceived outcome.

Be the rogue element, not a determined consistency.

(c) K Wicks