If You Control The Food

This one is about food. It can’t have escaped many people’s attention that this is a massive issue being orchestrated around us. Globally, nationally and locally. It’s high on the priority list and seems to be making the news a lot. To start with local and national issues, it seems foodbanks are a big thing and to me were the first signs of issues coming. It’s no secret that foodbanks have been a growing in number in the last few years, even before the ‘pandemic’ was rolled out. The cost of living putting the squeeze on many a person and family. And rather than look at the cause of the problem and sort that out by lowering costs and the corporate profits, they just think a quick fix solution will see it through in the short term. Prevention rather than cure they used to say, not anymore apparently. But I would like to examine a few things around the foodbanks, as I see the for and against argument in action and know of the issues, because people are people. I have struggled in my younger days to afford food, and had a patchy upbringing initially for consistency, so can appreciate some of the social issues that feed into this (no pun intended).

The argument is that people who can well afford food are using them, but just so they can save a bit of money, or use said funds for something else. If someone else will pay for your dinner, then why not? What’s the harm in taking what is on offer? Do people consider that someone else may miss out because they are in line? Maybe. But the counter argument could be, they are avoiding missing out themselves by getting in there first. And as we well know, many who need it won’t even try, through shaming of themselves for reasons known to them (lots of people see it as a failure if they can’t afford food, and won’t want to share that fact). No-one else required for that shame it would seem, they hold themselves back on that one which in itself is a shame. It would have been shocking in my youth to see someone with a full-time well-paid job, queuing up for charity handouts. The idea was, if you work hard you can provide for yourself. And it was that way once, until they decided that they didn’t want people having enough, or being comfortable. And what was once well paid, does not even cut it now. The idea that you could sustain a household and family on one income is pretty much a myth now, a story of times very much past. We can only dream of that kind of luxury now.

But I used to think it was a combination of pride and shame that kept everything in check. Not the rules, or the systems themselves, but people and their attitudes and outward demeanour. I know social attitudes haven’t always been for the better, but I believed this one worked. Because of the community set up. Pride and shame would sometimes get in the way, as people wouldn’t always ask for help (and is still the case as mentioned above), and they wouldn’t want to be seen as a failure, either to themselves or to everyone else. It can be hard. But I fully believed that if you couldn’t feed yourself, you would have to ask for help, either knock on someone’s door and ask, or try and beg for food. I thought the community was meant to be there to help, but it is only a community if people know each other, and there is a common purpose within it. So once someone had sorted themselves out, people would know if they were then taking the piss. The levels of greed and selfishness people can employ is staggering, with little or no thought, compassion or empathy towards others. And it seems that lots of people who genuinely do need help, are also too shy or afraid to ask. Having a brass neck gets you more, and being quiet and reserved doesn’t. This we know. But my grandpa gave me another piece of advice I took very literally and used throughout my life “If you don’t ask you don’t get, and the worst that can happen is people say no”. Simple and effective. It’s a skill though on top of that to prepare yourself for that possible no, as well as being mature enough to understand and gauge if it is really necessary to ask, and if you are within the etiquette of the relationship you have with the person or entity you are asking for something from. And being able to accept the ‘no’ in a gracious manner and move on. Imposing on people, or using their good nature against them is not good etiquette.

But as with the folk who will let shame hold them back from asking, there are those who seem to have none. At all. So can we find a balance in all that? Is there a way to educate people to understand the difference between need and want, to have better knowledge of land management, land practices and be more actively involved in them? Some are trying, with self-sustainability a view, but as the authorities cast their net of control even further, those are part of the things now under very real attack. Supermarkets are being overhauled, the meat industry being hampered, new rules and regulations to license everything even further, meaning there is always a way to get rid of your competition, or just competing ideas. The increase in utilities in the UK appears to be the last sure-fire way to decimate lots of businesses that managed to hold on throughout the last few years. Many are shutting down as they simply can’t afford to provide heat and light or pay their bills. We really have come far, haven’t we? It’s shocking we continue to look to the same people and establishment that caused this, to fix this. As if it is some error of judgement they made, or that they mean to help sort it out. Neither are correct. And once you accept they have an overriding plan in place, things make more sense. Food is going to be the big one. Some people can do without their travel monitoring, some don’t need their medical ‘care’, or the education system they offer. So how do you get the people who aren’t tied in via other means. The one thing that literally everyone has in common. Food and the need to eat.

I have already covered lots of the angles they are using and how they tie together in my previous article It seems an attack, trying to explain the how and the why for the people who can’t seem to see it.

It’s relentless now though, paying UK farmers to retire early, trying to push Dutch farmers off their land so they can buy it, multiple corporate purchases of farmland in the US. India has also had its farming attacked in recent years, and others if you start to look around the world. Fires of food plants, burning of wheat fields, power cuts so previously stored food has to be chucked away. Paving the way nicely I might add for those corporate giants to unroll their ‘new menu’ for the masses. Deciding for some unknown reason that they are in charge of nature, the world and of its management. Which is terrifying by itself, but factor in that they have no interest in humanity or saving anything. They want a sweep and clear operation, out with the old and in with the new. But it’s so heartless, and empty what they foresee as our future, so I am not on board. I still believe that people can take responsibility for themselves and others, and can start to right some of the wrongs being inflicted on a level not seen in our lifetime. But they have paved the way for the worst in people to come out, laid the foundations, created imagery and propaganda to stoke those attributes, so we will see if humanity can avoid the trap we have been set. There is a strange future coming…

(c) K Wicks

What comes next?

There is much going on that really doesn’t need speculation, it’s out there for everyone to see. But where it all leads, that’s where we can still theorise. With the speed of their ‘jab rollout’ it can’t have bypassed many that the goalposts are changing almost daily, it’s just two weeks, it’s just one Christmas, it’s just one year, it’s just your job, it’s just your relative, it’s just one jab… It’s only the over 80’s and vulnerable, now the 70’s, actually once over the 50s. Hang on, every adult, no wait a minute, children too. So before we have even had time to study the effects of this new wonder drug, or see the results of any trials, they are going for the children. It may sound as if they are coming for them, literally, and to be honest, they make it sound like that.

They have taken more than is rightfully theirs. It’s not just the limited freedom and choices we did and do have, but they are also taking your time. And that really is something you cannot buy more of or get back. They are now pushing ever faster for more. More of you. They want to know what will happen if they keep pushing, keep jabbing and keep wanting from you. It will wear you down, there’s no doubt about that, but wear you down to what? They believe it will wear you down to compliance, that the constant pressure and strain will break many, and possibly it will. People haven’t been designed to cope with ongoing stress, or emotional pressure or fear, for long sustained periods of time. It is detrimental to our development, health and growth, this we know. So, I have to presume they are well aware of what they are doing to people. But ultimately, I and others do keep coming back to the why of it all? Why are they doing this? Is it just for the great reset? Is it for agenda 21/30, where you will own nothing and be happy? As we have seen of late, there are many theories, some conspiracy still as they have yet to play out. But some have become undeniable fact. And the most worrying development for most, is the way they want to jab everyone, including children. Even though they have admitted they are no risk from the ‘virus’ and don’t know any of the long or short-term effects. So anyone in their right mind should be concerned at that, no? Well, apparently not, only some people are furious and outraged and have gone into protective mode over their offspring. But an alarming number of people seem to be as blindly trusting as they have been for decades that the establishment knows best. That they must be doing everything for our best interests, health and safety. Why anyone would really think that is beyond me, given what we know of governments and what they have done, home and abroad. Yet here we are, people literally lining up to hand themselves over to be ‘looked after’. Good luck to them, and I really hope I am just being over the top with my worries and speculations.

I will finally get to the point of this one and how it’s links together for me. The rate of heart attacks since the rollout has been of concern to me (and hopefully many others), a development we did not see before the rollout, and one which any normal person would presume to be related to said rollout until we could prove otherwise. They seem to be super keen to shut down any discussion, questioning or debate surrounding that, which is another concern. But where does that lead if there is a link? Heart problems and in particular myocarditis is now prevalent, and like many people I hadn’t heard of this condition at all throughout my life until this year. And that it is mostly happening in young, fit and healthy people even more worrying. (I theorise here that elderly people may have already passed from this after the rollout started, but they would have just been written off as average heart attacks, especially if within 14 days as they don’t consider you vaccinated until after that time, or at least did – now you aren’t if they say you aren’t, regardless of what you have done so far). So, young people are being encouraged to have it, regardless of the effects on them, they are being pressurised through emotional blackmail and threats or dreams and hopes being crushed and taken away. So many are complying. The survival rates for myocarditis aren’t good, by five years you have a 50% chance of mortality. That really doesn’t sound advisable as a risk against a survival rate of 99.7% if you happen to catch the ‘rona.

Let’s imagine how different your childhood, teenage years or young life becomes or would have been if you have a ticking timebomb in your chest. Technically we are all on the clock and have an expiry date, but that gives it a new level of intensity surrounding mortality. Don’t get too worried or anxious about it though, you might have a heart attack, don’t get excited, or have fun, or run, or dance, or anything that would raise your heart level too much. Just in case. Might die. Suddenly it changes how you think, behave, interact with others and more importantly, it shortens your time. Maybe some people would still live and experience things, go with old sayings – feel the fear and do it anyway or you only live once right? Throw caution to the wind and experience what you can while you can. But others won’t, they will stop living in case they die. It seems so counterproductive. Stop people living in order to stop people dying. Although we know that was just the buckled lie to get everyone to jump through hoops, and they did. And in the end they didn’t stop anyone dying – my previous article It Looked Sinister covers those points, and since then we know of more. This isn’t about saving anyone, but does seem to be about controlling people, their habits, thoughts, wants, their futures and fears. And let’s be honest, the children are the future, so if you manage to get them now, you have the future sewn up. They can’t fight back if they can’t fight. And that goes for all of us, we are not gone yet and should not leave them to the possibility of a dark fate and future. If we are wrong, no harm done, we look silly and move one. But if we are right, it doesn’t look good.

Screenshot from ‘The Time Machine’ (1960)

(c) K Wicks

Monitoring

It really has snowballed hasn’t it? Within a very short time we have gone from going about our business and daily lives, to having most aspects of it blindsided.

Years ago, only mere decades, people used cash so most of the transactions weren’t noted. Debit cards came in which started to pull it all together. We didn’t have smart tv’s or meters, no tracking devices on cars, no CCTV, no mobile phones. On the face of it, introducing all those things appeared to make life easier. For you to monitor yourself and use those things to save time and hassle.

But the purpose has switched. All of that now traps us, monitors us, and will ultimately it seems, be used against us. Everything moving online, including medical appointments is the worst thing we could have done. And I know it seems silly to think any one person alone would be interesting in their usage of things or what they spend or eat. But with that they know how to get to you, and collectively they can manipulate things. Knowledge is power as they say.

They also do not appear to be making a secret of a social credit score scheme rolling out, similar to another country recently mentioned in the media a lot. But let’s be honest, we have a class system in this country going back centuries which used to be your social credit score, then we introduced credit cards and a credit rating. Sounds like a credit system to me. And we blithely accepted that one without question. Keen to ‘earn points’ by being in debt, and jumping through financial hoops to be good enough to lend money to so you can take part in society.

What seems to be coming is a levelled-up version of that. But the way it is being intermingled with the current agenda, I have suspicions of how intrusive it will end up being. My piece on Cash and the incoming cashless society touched upon this, but I will go further and piece together what I see.

The roll out of fitbit and apple watches to monitor your heartbeat and vitals. Exercise bikes in the home fitted up to a central system that knows you are exercising. Smart fridges that can be controlled by something somewhere. Points and incentives already for shopping where they encourage you to. Sounds like a credit system and monitoring to me, but we invited it, signed up to it and didn’t notice when they changed the rules. (I don’t have any of the above, because of where I see it going, when I say we, I talk of the collective). They are already talking of ‘incentives’ to make you lose weight and live healthier by their standards. So let’s examine what that means. In my mind, to monitor someone on that, you have to have them log in every morning, noon and night, fill in what they eat, they drink and what they do in a day. Sounds a bit intrusive doesn’t it? Well, how else would they know? They have proved they don’t trust the public one bit to make their own decisions or run their own lives.

So, picture it. You wake up, sign into your app, do your exercise, eat what they say, you get your points for the day or approval rating for your transaction. Then the next day the same, but after a week or so they decide they need to know more information. They suspect you are eating things while you are out and not reporting them, so they install a urine monitor. Every morning, noon and night, you now have to give them a sample, to prove that you are complying. They lock your fridge once you have gone over your allotted calorie intake for the day. They restrict your card so you can’t buy food while out. They insist it is to keep you healthy, but you end up hungry, stressed, sneaking around and unhappy. But they know better than you right?

You might think that is a far-fetched scenario, and for the sake of where we are, I genuinely hope you don’t. Because is there really any difference in recent talks of making people film themselves taking harmful, inaccurate and costly tests at home, to prove they are complying? It’s a slippery slope and one we are already on and picking up speed at an alarming pace. When they start interfering in where you can go, who you can see and what you can say should have been the first warning. It will be followed by what you can wear, what you can eat, how much you can weight. Because you know, save the NHS, or whatever crisis they invent to serve their purpose. Just imagine the worst, most vindictive, controlling, hateful and unreasonable parent in the world, calling all the shots in your life, for the rest of your life. Making the most outrageous demands, stopping you doing things you enjoy just because they like depriving you of things. Now, translate that to who oversees us currently. No-one should have more right over your body than you. Full stop. You can try and use the selfish argument, I hear it a lot, but is it not the height of selfishness to force and coerce someone to do something because you want them to. Demanding and selfish in fact. “I want you to do something to keep me safe” – I and me used there. Says more about the person demanding and the person not bending to it. Keeping someone else happy is not more important than my own safety, health and wellbeing.

I would just ask that everyone take a good long hard look around them. Really see these systems for what they are, understand what they intend to do with them, and how that will change things going forward. I do not wish for things to always remain the same or go back to the way they were, I’m not afraid of progress when it is required and logical and think we should be an adaptive species. But we are being steered by very wilful, controlling people who have wanted to and have been enacting their ideas and agendas for quite some time. If you can work your way through all the smokescreens, lies and diversions, it is there in plain sight. And it isn’t pretty…

Another possibility of where this monitoring may lead and what they may be viewing us as, my later article – Perhaps

Photo from the book The People Shapers by Vance Packard.

(c) K Wicks