I had already speculated on the ‘opportunity’ a shared event creates and used films to illustrate my point – one article being Films, real life twisted or just fantasy?. I’ll do so again here though, because many don’t seem to realise what kind of power that has, in the collective psyche of people, and how it can be used to further mould and shape society.
The Island (2005) – a stark view of something that is discussed in my piece Perhaps, where people are bred as replacement organs for rich people, but they are kept underground with no knowledge of the real world or their true purpose. Instead, they ‘imprint’ them and condition them to believe that there was a catastrophe, a virus in fact. And the world outside is so toxic, they have to stay down there, hoping one day to win their ‘lottery’ and go to a pathogen free island where ‘you can live a normal life’. The whole society functions on that premise, until someone starts questioning things, as is the way. But I found it interested how the overseer (Sean Bean in this film), had quite a well-developed God complex going on, and took great delight in explaining how they were bred to believe they were special and only educated to the level of a 15 year old, which seemed to keep them in line for the most part. Seems a bit like how we are treated don’t you think? Or is it just me that sees it?
Book of Eli – this is a great film, well done, atmospheric, gritty. And is about a disaster happening, although it is a vague briefly mentioned ‘event’ that was a bright flash, which blinded lots of people, and then everything went to shit. We step into the story after 30 years has elapsed, and it’s worth a watch. Even just for Gary Oldman’s brilliant portrayal of someone obsessed with finding a bible. Because with that, he knows he can control people, even more so that shown. Because what we are led to believe is, if everything did go to shit, or there was a real danger to behold, that we would all scatter and try and save ourselves with no thought for humanity. Apart from maybe one or two lone ‘heroes’ to save the day or give hope. The film The Road would be an even more desolate and grim look at what they would like to think people would turn into. I don’t doubt the capability, but I question the continued conditions that would be necessary to create such a landscape.
There are a few films I will mention together here as they have something similar to me – Resident Evil, Greenland, The Day after Tomorrow, 2012, Outbreak, Deep Impact – and I guess any of the films that have ‘natural disaster’ or virus as the headlining event, with huge amounts of drama unfolding, survivors and a new horizon often at the end, not always a good one, as Resident evil showed, in a never-ending cycle of rinse and repeat. They like that method, and to be honest, if it works, why not. Gets a bit boring though if you happen to notice it. In real life and films.
If people have been exposed to the same information, education, propaganda, media and conditioning, it makes it much easier to make that group accept something, or act in the way you would like with the correct triggers, if you can get most people on board. And anyone not playing ball, gets pushed out, excluded, or shouted down. It also helps people to feel familiar with each other, gives them a social bond and sort of identity in that place and time by ‘experiencing’ an event.
But there will now be a ‘shared collective experience’ that seems so useful a tool in many a movie. And helpful to separate again
Dark City – is a film I mention time and time again, if you haven’t watched it, I recommend it. But this movie is the inverted version of the above, where the do the opposite to people. Give them no shared history, or events, or place in time, and tampering with their memories and identities, leading to lost and rather robotic people. Until one person ‘wakes up’ during a memory procedure, and has to unravel the very odd set up and ‘people’ organising it all.
So, what happens I wondered, if you merge the two. Creating a shared event that we are all bound by, but with no real timeline or end so no closure to move forward from. This could cause a possible destabilisation of being trapped in the same event continuously, without said event actually continuing to occur. And with details being changed, definitions rewritten it’s easy to see how some people might get confused, and start to feel a bit lost. Changing names, rules, areas, time, thoughts, futures and people. It all has a purpose, even if you can’t see it yet, it all paves the way for something else.
A meandering thought this one, of a familiar and well-loved TV series, that’s had it’s ups and downs, but on the whole has spanned decades and is still relatively popular. 23rd November 1963 it began.
Firstly, it was just seeing a word we see a lot these days, of a certain organisation heading and international effort to vaccinate the world. The WHO. Spearheading itself as a medical authority over countries and the world, they say. So, doctors, of the WHO, you can see where I’m going now, yes? Doctor WHO.
Now, a time-travelling doctor that isn’t really a doctor (because he is a Time Lord), that changes his appearance to fit that ‘time’ after his old body has expired or past it’s best. Interesting.
UNIT, the intelligence force on earth that would work with him – the UN formed in 1945, perhaps?
DAVROS – DAVOS – just looking for similarities.
The TARDIS, stuck as a blue police box, perhaps a representation of being protected by ‘the boys in blue’ there.
It seems quite a loose connection, but it’s been noted of late, how much the push for science fiction really took off in the late 50’s to early 60’s and thereafter. Creating huge swathes of entertainment, industry, budgets for space travel etc. It bewitched people. And it also distracted them, making them think and dream of ‘out there’, rather than focus on down here, and over there. It also prepared people by way of programming for future events, gadgets and inventions which seemed ahead of their time. They have everything way before we do, orchestrated conveniently when they established patents and offices for them. A handy way to garner all the new and innovative ideas isn’t it? Making sure certain ones never see the light of day, or are put aside for their own use, or when the time is right for their industries to make the most of it.
Part of the reason they maybe do the ritual of show and tell by way of entertainment and media, could be because they need everyone to be primed for it, to be more accepting of it. Covered in my previous article Prepped for disaster, or clever programming? We are a visual creature and learn a great deal through watching, which has been used against us in this instance I feel. And often we will accept something quite unpalatable because it is familiar, when faced with a complete unknown. They know this. Everything is for a reason and purpose, whether noted or even noticeable, it’s not by accident. So, I’ll keep looking for things that seem to be a piece in an ever growing puzzle. And although sometimes it might seem like a piece doesn’t fit now, I’ll store it for later if it seems important, cause you never know…
You hear talk of the categories the last few generations have been put into, boomers, Gen X, Millennials, and now Gen Z. In fact, people seem to happily put themselves into the categories sometimes, finding it gives them a sense of being in a certain ‘time’ perhaps, or a generation they can identify with, discussed briefly in A lost generation. But I can’t help wonder about it from other angles, in my usual way.
A wild theory was put out there recently, that that they have added a third strand to the standard double helix structure of the human make-up, and was speculated upon in the grand scheme of symbolising ceremonies that was made public. So, have they added to X and Y, to bring Z into our composition?
Generation Zombie. Suddenly, the idea of Gen Z not sounding so cool. And maybe it isn’t the zombie apocalypse we thought it would be, where they become the real undead and want for brains (although ironically that does still kind of fit). Instead, they become the drug addicted half dead, wanting more of the chemicals and entertainment being dispensed and drip fed to them from above. Or perhaps it is the other original meaning, a will-less and speechless human, as is said in Voodoo folklore and fictional works. Not quite so yet, because although ‘free speech’ may be under attack in the online forum, there is no shortage of people who have something to say, on both sides, myself included. And for now, technology permits us to be able to share, save and reproduce those words, thoughts and ideas on various mediums almost instantaneously. But are we really talking from a place of ‘free speech’ anyway? There are those who say we lack free will already, so whose words and ideas are we talking here? Have they been planted within us through various forms? My articles Films, real life twisted or just fantasy? and Planting the seeds, look at that a bit and I have also written a few on the zombie topic before – The zombie thing, Zombies perhaps and Not quite in control, if you are interested in further ones on that.
But it does seem that something is changing, with people, society and what we know as being human. Changing into what exactly? touched upon it, but as it continues and they talk of putting chips in our brains, assisted suicide, a virtual metaverse, smart cities and various other changes to what we are and how we live, it’s no wonder many people aren’t happy. Because those things do not ultimately benefit the masses, and is not meant for the betterment of the ‘little people’, it’s for the entrapment and containment of them, in the most efficient and hassle free way, for them. And while I point out the difference between us and them, I am aware that they wouldn’t be them, unless they were allowed to become so. We know certain things are bad and line corporations’ pockets, but we do it anyway. We eat the sugar laden foods, we drink the fizzy pop, we take the medications – like good little Eloi.
Because while the book The Time Machine looked at the far future, and how things had become split between the Morlocks and the Eloi, who were just being bred and fed, for the ultimate purpose of being food. I realised maybe that’s where we are now, and it’s not in the future at all, that’s where the story tricked us. It is now, and the Morlocks work hard with their underground world to make everything appear as they need it, so that the above ground Eloi will just go about their daily lives, laughing, eating, not worrying about a thing until they are told to. Hypnotised by the siren when it is their time to step forward. Sound kind of familiar? Maybe it’s just me that sees it that way…
You may or may not be familiar with the so called ‘fictious’ island known as Frisland. I am not one for just going with what ‘they’ say, so like to do a bit of digging to see what it’s all about. And this one I find interesting, because it is purported to be a completely made-up island, as so “Frisland, also called Frischlant, Friesland, Frislanda, Frislandia, or Fixland, is a phantom island that appeared on virtually all of the maps of the North Atlantic from the 1560s through the 1660s”. So, for over 100 years, all sorts of cartographers, from all over the place, just happened to ‘make up’ an island on every map. Sure Jan. Convenient way though to just erase a bit of the past, isn’t it? “Oh, don’t worry about THAT, they just made it up, move along, nothing to see here. But we’re not making it up…” Here is one of the maps of the time to give you an example of what there is to see.
Map by Nicolo Zeno, 1558
So, we have very clearly all the other places we know exist today, with very detailed coastlines, names of places and mountain ranges etc. But for some unexplained reason, not content with actual coastlines and landmasses to chart and record, no, they just made them up out of the blue. Main question would be, why? And when everything else appears so accurate, even the little island looking bits along Norway’s coast, if you zoom into those edges today, they appear as sandbanks. So why would I think they just made it up! That’s the bit that makes no sense. Unless, you realise there may have been land masses they didn’t want anyone else to know about as time went on, or areas that would reveal too much. And like I said, the ocean may have also changed its route, course and coverage of the land, showing certain areas as perhaps, Pangea or Gondwana to show ‘when the land was attached’, but maybe it’s always been attached, just underwater. With seasonal changes over a long period, what they are now calling climate, could in fact just be cyclical cooling and warming of our dome, which makes the ice melt, causing potential catastrophe but leads to a way out, or it gets cold and freezes meaning more land is revealed and we get to see a piece of what came before. Although, we don’t really, because certain institutions were formed to make sure they are the first ones called to anything of historic significance. They then take as long as they like, often under a veil of secrecy to ‘investigate’, then sometimes years later, we get a public ready piece of information about said discovery. So much more is known than we have been told.
But with the mysterious islands, and various tales of other and different lands, is it so far-fetched to think there is more? And given how many lies have been told about history, to suit the victor, I think it is correct to question that which came before, and that which we apparently see now, because as know, looks can be deceiving and you can achieve an awful lot if people just believe unquestioningly, something to be true. And they are discouraged from questioning, or looking, or wanting to see for themselves. If there is nothing to hide, then surely it makes no difference whatsoever if someone chooses to give it thought. Because sometimes one thought can lead to another, and curiosity, if present, should take it from there and form ideas and further thoughts and questions. I am more than happy to accept that people just got it wrong, repeatedly, all over the world for hundreds of years, but I also equally happy to accept that it has been orchestrated to appear as such, moulding a very small and controllable world by way of maps, programming and repetition. It may well be that California was never an island, and didn’t have a very straight cut off line, which now appears on current maps as the border between California and Oregon, despite first-hand accounts from people having sailed round it. And while doing their straight line, they clearly didn’t notice the rest of the land, instead electing to show it as water. Silly people of the past, can’t even draw maps properly! Or so we are told…
I’m going to talk about people movement again, specifically the people that seem to be coming over in droves according to the news. Same in the US actually, with their southern border being a major crossing point, with hundreds crossing each day, as with us over here on this much smaller landmass, the UK. And although we are surrounded by water, it makes no difference as boats are sent to help and rescue people making their way over. It’s been a great way to divide people, firstly by encouraging people to leave their home, by whatever method, then they have split the populations of where they are arriving, as not all see it as a genuine endeavour. And that’s what I will look at here, despite having written articles on this already in Hotel California, or Hotel Strategy? And On the ground, because really, being honest, most people don’t just up and leave en masse unless there is a reason. Either where they are isn’t ideal anymore, or somewhere else is better. And now factor into that, deliberately orchestrated events to force that movement, or lies to make out ‘over there’ sounds better than it is, because maybe where they are is rich in something they don’t know about, like minerals, oil, gold, water, all sorts of things that are of value to the commercial world. It’s horrible to realise how many people have been displaced deliberately, for no good reason other than profits and power, and still continue to be.
Refugee = a person who has been forced to leave their country in order to escape war, persecution, or natural disaster.
This was and is the definition currently for refugee, and for many, it fits. Because the wars and destabilisation over the decades have been many, not just internally, they have been interfered with from afar, but in an up close and personal way. Military bases all over the world, most of them for the US, but the UK does alright there too, and other countries are moving in on that. But not on the whole, it seems quite obvious who the troublemakers are, the bullies who just can’t leave everyone alone to get on, they have to be involved and pulling the strings.
And although in the last few years the Archbishop of Canterbury has thrown his worshippers under the bus, and sided with a tyrannical government on things, I actually agree with his one of his recent tweets, in which he states that
“When we fail to challenge the rhetoric that refugees are the cause of this country’s ills – that they are problems not people, or invaders to be tackled and deterred – we deny the essential value and dignity of fellow human beings.”
And he is right mostly, but no-one wants to really talk about what is the cause of this country’s ills. Just saying what they aren’t is all well and good, but to then completely skip over what they are is foolish in my opinion. Because while there is claim to be looking at the new arrivals as people and fellow human beings, how can you possible be looking at them with compassion and like that when you are putting them into a slowly boiling pot. I have suspected for a while that they are being used as pawns as we are, and will be dropped like a stone when the time comes, just like we have. So, we are all in the same boat (pardon the pun), but not everyone seems to know there is a massive leak, and they are just going to keep putting more people in the boat until you all drown, they care not for any of us, whether we are from here, or aboard. And I don’t entirely agree with him dismissing the idea that some of these people arriving, do bring problems with them, or are a problem, just as we have here already. Being from somewhere else doesn’t make you any less human, but with that comes all the attributes of humans, the good and the bad. And from what we have seen so far from the mainly male ‘refugees’ in large numbers put in hotels, there appears to be a steady increase of harassment towards women and young girls, and intimidating behaviour going on. Because that is what happens when you have droves of young people, dossing around kicking their heels, and getting handouts. People have been moaning about it for years about people here having that treatment, so why is it a surprise, in the middle of a massive financial and governmental crisis, that people might question, what the hell is going on. Why is our money, of which we are told there is none, being used to house, feed, cloth and set up people who have just arrived, when clearly ignoring your local population? In fact, not just ignoring, but actively going out of your way to take more off them, and to hurt and destroy areas of your local population while doing it. Would seem weird if a man was out with his wife, and for no reason, he just started to ignore her, refused to pay for her meal, or to get her home, and then just started treating a stranger to full slap-up meal and fawning all over them. You would think he was being super disrespectful and somewhat of an arse, wouldn’t you? Or would you have a go at the wife for saying something and being hurt and treated that way? Saying she was out of order for not putting the strangers or her husbands feelings before hers.
And this is where the part of the problem lies, being told to put others before yourself, to the detriment of yourself is taking it too far. There is a time for compassion, and to show empathy to your fellow human being, but, and I stress the but here, not at the cost of you, yours and what is right for you. Because in the blink of an eye, you suddenly become them. And they do say, most people are only one pay cheque away from being homeless, just look at America to see what’s happening, on a bigger scale in their cities. Zombie like drug addicts standing around like buckled statues, tents everywhere, rubbish, boarded up broken shops. Remnants of what used to be normal and nice. They opened the door to everything, and we let it in. I don’t mean people, I mean vice, and temptation, and ego. Gave it all a place, platform and position in society, making that more important and taking your attention away from what really should be important. I’ll go back to the main definition too here – for a refugee to be so, they need to be escaping war, persecution, or natural disaster. Now, war and natural disaster would appear to be quite cut and dry, but it’s the middle one that seems to be the main ticket at the moment. Although, let’s be honest, there have been plenty of war like situations created as well as economic disasters and famines. So, it’s not hard to see how and why there is a genuine need for some people, and mostly those people don’t want to leave their home, they just don’t have one anymore and are being forced out through strategic economic and political reasons. That is not the same as thousands of people, just appearing to jump ship from their own country, to someone else’s.
Persecution = hostility and ill-treatment, especially on the basis of ethnicity, religion, or sexual orientation or political beliefs.
So, what is defined as hostility is this instance? Because our own government appears to be treating lots of its own people in a hostile way, based on either ethnicity, sexual orientation and political beliefs. They should add medical beliefs to that now too, as we are entering a new era of things to persecute people for, rather than protect them against. Because while all these people are being moved around, uprooted, and are being redefined themselves, they are finding new ways and things to divide people up with, as well as utilising the good old-fashioned prejudices we hold anyway. I understand the problem, countries that are not at war or in distress, seem to have an awful lot of people ‘jumping ship’ as I mentioned above, which leads me to question that, as others are. Why? Is there something better being offered to them over here? Looks pretty shit at the moment and for the near future in the UK for business and the economy, so why would people want to still come here? Ah, yes, the freebies and handouts. If we weren’t giving people accommodation and living expenses and promises of more, would they still come? If it was only opportunity to earn a living and find your own way on offer, would we still get the numbers? Because many say, and I think the same, if you come here and want to work and get stuck in, then by all means, join in. No matter your colour or place of origin, it’s the mentality that matters. Because we have the same attitude towards ‘our own’ and have been moaning about ‘benefit scroungers’ for near on 30 years at least, even when the economy was doing vaguely ok. Because it’s really obvious that if you just keep giving handouts, and don’t let people get on, they will become dependent. Voila, the point of it. They will become dependent.
Children are usually looked after because they can’t look after themselves (and because it’s the parent’s responsibility), but we call them dependents. Duly looking to their parent for guidance, emotional support, financial and educational support. Then they grow up, and go off into the world to do that for themselves. But if they can’t, are unable, or won’t, then the natural progression doesn’t go where it should. I get the feeling that we, and the new arrivals, are supposed to be part of the strange new ‘parent world’ they want to have, where we are all treated like children, and made to be their dependents. Like some sick fetish the government has of wanting everyone to be like squabbling children, then they can intervene, ‘punish’ us, or put weird rules in place to ‘see what happens’. Like a really odd controlling parent or teacher might do, because it gives them the power, being able to ‘tell you off’ or ‘put you in your place’, which is what seems to be occurring here. And I have to keep wondering, as many do, at what point does someone in a position of power actually stand up and do something about it?
I couldn’t help seeing a similarity, in an artist’s rendering of Atlantis based on Plato’s description, the only surviving one we have so we go with it, as will I for this. But as you know, it’s supposed to be a set of concentric circles or rings of land, with ocean or waters in between. There have been searches for it, books written about, and careers dedicated to it, but as yet, we are still waiting to discover its location. And that is where I wondered if we were thinking too small, trying to find it within a landmass, or area of ocean. I’ll move now to the idea of Antarctica, because it will tie in to the overall explanation, and I am talking about the earth not being a globe as we know it, instead going with the idea of a much bigger globe earth, the crater theory and our realm actually being flat and round surrounded by a giant ice wall and covered by a dome firmament.
Based on that premise, I decided that humans as we know them could be Atlanteans, who were known for their warlike behaviour, and perhaps were exiled from being part of the bigger earth, and ‘dropped’ down into a great ice hole filled with water, which then became the Atlantic Ocean. We then had to go about creating maps or Atlas’s to navigate our way out, hence all the operation high-jump, deep freeze and so on. And ‘other planets’ they talk of visiting could be other craters within our crater, or ‘just over there’ land masses, rather than ‘up there’. But it is said that there are other lands beyond what we have been told, that there are maps within the international organisations that show these other lands and resources, and the mystery of the Antarctic treaty is one that baffles many.
I do believe the water and ice distribution has changed over time, and if the level has risen and fallen possibly too, we could have the wild variations we have on maps from throughout the centuries, which they laugh off as made up, or wrong. I have another article underway along that theme about islands, so will go into that more in that one, An island, or was it? But the idea that the land masses we know of and the world we have been told is being questioned, and rightly so, as there have been many things they deceived people on, and kept from them, so why not? Makes me think of the saying ‘the world just got much smaller’, and we think that is to do with technology making everyone seem closer. Or was it? Could it have been when they shut off certain other areas, or relabelled them. Changing names, locations, ideas, moving people around, changing the history and making it easy to eliminate from common knowledge, that which you don’t want people to know anymore. And the purpose is?touched upon that slightly. But to me, it made sense when it came to borders, land, maps, ownership and slavery of people. All people, in varying degrees of it from ‘elite’ corporate slavery, to the harsh and brutal conditions felt by some who are used for more manual and back-breaking tasks. If we knew there was more, and better over there, wouldn’t we try and find it? Wouldn’t the curious, brave and adventurous amongst us be exploring that? Oh no, we can’t, because we’ve been told it’s all been discovered, nothing to see here. And if there is, they put up restriction, borders and barriers to keep us all in our fishbowl. Because a fish doesn’t know there is a massive lake over there when he is in a tank, or know there is an ocean over there when he is in a lake. And while we are encouraged to focus on ‘out there’ as a concept of space, again conveniently set up so that only the super-rich, famous and connected get to do it, we aren’t looking over there. And that’s the purpose it serves in my mind, my other article Flat, or round? looked at the age old argument that has been resurrected about is it a globe earth or flat earth, and that is the case in point. Many people get stuck arguing about flat or round, and want to be right so it becomes a battle. I prefer to look at what is gained from people thinking one or the other, and what the possibilities are for both scenarios.
So, we know they lie to people, they control people and they dictate the information you receive and are taught to ‘view the world’ with, so why is it so hard for some people to accept the idea that they really could have lied about that too. Because whether it is flat or round, your feet are still on the floor, and it doesn’t change your physical position at all. But it really does change how you think, or at least should, and then knowing that such a large pattern of lies could be constructed and enforced can also be shocking to people, so they can’t or won’t accept it. And that applies to many things, not just this debate, but any where there is any large-scale deception going on, but that’s ok, because we have a couple of words to make sure we stop any of that nonsense dead in its tracks haven’t we? Conspiracy Theorist. But I wonder how many people even look at the meaning of those words. Conspiracy = a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful. Theorist = not yet proven. So, I’m not really sure why some people think that is a slur, or an insult to throw those words at people, when clearly it means they have thought through what appears to be an unfolding plot. Maybe it’s easier for people to accept who don’t or can’t think things through on certain subjects, if others don’t either. Same with detectives I guess, sometimes they see a bit more than others, or can piece together what others didn’t, so many TV shows and fictional characters portray this, and people love them. Not so much when it happens in real life though it seems, unless it’s for a cut and dry murder case, but someone revealing the whole set up to be a lie? Seems that is a hardy no thanks…
Not in the exciting way that sentence is usually attached to, but in a normal way, living on the edge of society. While we see more restrictions and rules close in around us in our daily lives, I can’t help thinking of how it happened, and how there were always those signs it would be this way. And instead of heeding those warnings, however subtle they may have been, we collectively ignored them, instead doing exactly what was expected of us. A couple of points for this particular piece, and I’ll go with Gypsies as the first, travelling folk and the ones who seemed to always do what they want, not being told where to be or what to do, yet managing to sustain whole communities and organise. Now, I am aware that a certain criminality used to follow where they went (not all), but was it always that way? Or was that a consequence of new laws and rules, meaning they would always be moved on, not allowed to stay and earn a living, so they adapted to their environment, to a point. Same with lots of areas of the country, where the government keep them in a deprived state, meaning there are only certain options available to them for making money. Because really, that’s what it usually comes down to. People trying to make money, so they have a roof over their head and eat. And they have put so many barriers and obstacles in the way of those very simple things, so they are no longer simple. My reasoning for some of that is laid out in my article Life, and why it would suit a purpose to the powers that be, to make your everyday normal life hard and stressful to navigate.
But back to the travelling community, who may indeed have only become such travellers because they were always being moved on, before they got a chance to settle, or put down more roots. But I became quite intrigued by them as a community when I learnt they were ‘outside the system’ mostly. Same may not be true today, I’m not sure, but I couldn’t believe it. No birth certificate often, didn’t live in houses or on estates, didn’t claim benefits because they weren’t registered, but had to make their way so would do cash jobs or find other avenues of revenue, whatever they could find, I guess. Now, that sounds very much like the type of thing we all used to live like, maybe not constantly moving or travelling, but just getting by. Not having to be registered, regulated and ruled. Because it all starts with that first certificate doesn’t it? Where you sign your children over to the state essentially, and they are then ‘in the system’ as we call it. So they can ‘care’ for you, ‘educate’ you, ‘medicate’ you ‘keep you safe’ and so on. Do you see the pattern emerging? And we have seen how those four particular branches of the establishment, have been used to coordinate what we see now, if you try and get out of one area, another has you. Also by way of regulation though, little things at first, my article It was a piece at a time, goes into that too, but I started noticing when they started fining parents for taking their kids out of school early for holidays. A slight overreach I thought, isn’t anyone concerned by that? The way the authorities started overriding parents became more prevalent, and shocking incidents in the 80’s of children being taken from their parents in the middle of the night by ‘care services’ didn’t make me feel any more safe as a kid, I have to say. I started to see that the authorities had too much power over the individual and family unit, and it would only get worse. Courts gets to decide things, schools tell you what you can and can’t do with your children, they take money from you and interfere when really, if people didn’t have that interference and control over them, maybe they would be able to get on, or sort things out themselves, or be able to grow into a proper adult who is responsible for themselves and their own family. Because they are taking that away slowly, but surely. And perhaps that is why so many seem lost, or unsure, or unable to sort themselves out, because there so many hoops to jump through already just to ‘quality for society’ that some just can’t be bothered. And I totally understand it now. Trapped in the system, and by the system.
My second point is about chips again, covered recently in Chipping away. It starts with pet chips though, and on the face of it, did seem like a good idea. Your dog can always be identified, in case it gets lost, or stolen. Apparently it meant everyone would have to legally register their dog, and you would be a ‘good citizen’ dog owner for complying. And oh how we shake our heads when they say, ‘this dog hasn’t got a chip’, or we look down on someone because they ‘didn’t follow the regulations’. Because let’s be honest, it didn’t change much did it? Shitty people can still buy and have dogs, dogs can still be stolen and the chips cut out, or they actually work their own way out i’ll have you know. But it didn’t reduce any dog attacks, or stop any thievery, or make any dogs any safer from that, but yes, some pets have managed to be reunited with their owners because of it. And other people and companies have made an awful lot of money from those products, services and insurance that often goes with a new regulation or law change. And now the talks of chips has inevitably swung round to humans, in fact over a decade ago now, and around 5 years ago they started implanting them. Over 4,000 people in Sweden initially, and maybe more or less by now, because if it was a total bust, would they tell us? Not yet anyway, only after they have sold them to everyone, and exhausted all avenues of revenue for that, would they admit it didn’t work. And not being funny, but we can’t even seem to get the most basic of societal system to remain at a stable or consistent level currently, so the idea they are just going to become this slick fully functioning dystopian society, is almost laughable. But to be fair, I’d rather save the laughing for when I know that for sure, because they are pretty good at making it look like something, without it actually being there or real. If you catch my drift. And this week a leaflet caught my eye, of the Freemasons of Georgia offering child identification chips, so here we are, the Slippery slope just keeps getting longer. We are being made to be part of a corporate life and society whether we like it or not, and it seems there really are better ways. Instead of a greedy company, pretending to be a democratic government telling you what to do all the time to line their pockets, don’t you think?
It’s like we are getting the knock-off, cheap version of life. Rebranded, repackaged, and repurposed to be what we have currently. Soon to be even crappier they say. A possible reason for this I covered in my article Life, but so many people have noticed it, and a feeling of being unsatisfied is naturally going with it.
And for those who can’t take it anymore, or they just deem too much hassle, we now have assisted suicide. Just to add to the More than sinister we have going on. But that isn’t really just it, there is an overall plan to help people self-destruct it seems. And if they don’t get there quick enough, they have ways to encourage you or steer you there. And if this simulation in a simulation in a simulation becomes too much after all, you can hook yourself in to another virtual world, which can blow your brains out if you don’t ‘win’ or ‘survive’ in the game. And I’m sure it will be live streamed and watchable to whoever gets their kicks from that kind of thing. Next level ‘gaming and entertainment’ eh? Suddenly the Running Man springs to mind, or Hunger Games and other set ups of that nature.
But we know there are better ways, a better life and way of living to be had. Vast landscapes we are restricted from, resources are hidden and taken from us, and restricted, all sorts of mechanisms by which we could make our lives better have been commandeered and taken over. Our lives have been usurped, from under our very noses. Because trauma and despair in overwhelming doses makes people worn down and more accepting it would seem. People of the past as far as we know didn’t have access to information from the next town as it occurred, let alone the whole world all at the same time, but they did have dramatic incidents from which they obviously recovered, otherwise we wouldn’t have made it this far. The over-saturation of ‘news’ and doom mongering though by way of constant electronic device is making life seem more fraught with danger and darkness than it should be. And not by accident, certain events abroad are often used to fuel and flame a ‘social feeling’ they wish to create which then paves the way nicely for more guidelines, regulations and rules. “You have to do this, because someone over there is doing that”, seems to be the way they are playing it. While ignoring problems right in front of your face. Ignoring the real, to focus on the maybe. Seems complete madness to me and is driving things into the ground. Separate the real issues and problems from the perceieved ones, and understand when someone is taking advantage of a situation or timing, for their own gratification or gain, because there are many opportunists out there, and they come with all sorts of wants. Remember that.
But that is how they get you living a virtual life, within your real one first, by drawing your focus to things that are not directly affecting your physical being, so they worm their way in mentally first, to encourage the adjustment in your physical behaviour. Plant the seeds, then watch them grow kind of thing. Imagine all the things you would have done if you hadn’t been sat watching TV, hours and months spent watching carefully crafted, scripted ‘lives’ and scenarios. No wonder life seems a bit crazy and haphazard to some people, without conclusion or closure, no cliff-hanger, or resolution. Because that’s what happens in the scripted and edited version, real life isn’t supposed to be like that, but it does seem that some people are not able to deal with real life after the expectation or ideals they have developed from societal influences. Media, school, TV, family, friends all play their part in how someone views the world, and forms an understanding of things. So, again, imagine if you don’t like what the family and friends are saying who are real people in your life, but you do like what the television and celebrities are saying, and decide that they are more appropriate for you as ‘role models’ or someone to look up to. Which is fine essentially, we can and should be able to choose our influences and input, but are they real? What if you are basing your whole reality and presence on a work of fiction? And a constantly changing one at that, because the wheels of industry demand that we move that their pace, and if anyone doesn’t keep up or change quick enough, they are cast aside and left behind. No longer part of the current thing, they were just being used to push along an idea, an agenda, to create the next fad. The First Fad gives a bit more on that subject.
And I am going to mention medications here, because it seems that there are many people under the influence of those too, for this I am talking specifically painkillers and anti-depressants/anxiety medication. Covered from a certain angle in Memory and An error, but a big one, it seems that there is another side to these things that isn’t common knowledge as far as I know. I will brief it again, painkillers first. Firstly, the found that some of them impair the formation of short-term memories, which seems important if I’m honest. Also, it turns out that when the painkillers work to help dull your pain receptors, they also dull and dampen other areas of feeling too, like emotions and empathy, leading me to think that long term usage not only gives you an addiction, it also means you are not feeling normal feelings towards things in life. Which may well be the point of why some people continue taking them, once the physical pain diminishes (I understand it doesn’t always in some cases), maybe the other feelings that return are a bit of a shock when you come off them, and many aren’t prepared for it. Having felt and thought a different way for some time, thinking it’s actually you, turns out it wasn’t. Next up is the anti-depressants and anxiety medication, of which there appears to be plenty of candidates signed up to a lifetime of it, some just through resignation that they will never be ‘normal’ without their meds. As we know, some of those meds unfortunately, can actually cause anxiety, and depression, and suicidal thoughts, and physical side effects, and can be addictive. And again, what they don’t tell you is, they also mess with your ability to process new information and to feel emotions and empathy properly, either supressing them, or enhancing them. Sometimes leading to more drugs to cope with the clash of central processing info going on in your brain. I do not agree however, with just expecting people to cope, or throwing them to the wolves of life when they have problems. I think they can be helpful, and useful when applied correctly. But let’s be honest, it suits a purpose to have people constantly in need of something only they can dish out, It’s big business goes into that if you are unsure of a possible why. And it helps to keep people controllable, pliable and comfortably numb, as Led Zeppelin put it, paving the way quite well for a confused society, at odds with itself, and not functioning as well as it could. Not just being held down through economic pressures, systems and regulations, but through mental and medical interference. And perhaps now we know how it could ever get this far, and why haven’t more people realised or reacted…
Hating the life you have, can perhaps make a new one more attractive, so maybe that’s why they try to make basic living and surviving somewhat of a chore. Hoping that people will gladly accept the ‘new, easy and secure’ digital lifestyle coming our way apparently. Because that’s probably how they got everyone to comply the last time round at the end of the 1800’s, set people up to fail and wear them down to acceptance and compliance. And I say apparently for the digital vision they have, because although it appears they want it, the infrastructure to support it seems very lacking and not quite up to scratch at all. And in fact, things that used to work perfectly well, no longer do. Threats of power shortages, farming being disrupted, cyber-attacks threatened, roads being restricted. Funny really too when you realise they claim to want everything being electric powered and renewable, a glaring point of failure, and still we push forward.
Yet, all mostly being done through words alone, and some flimsy regulations or guidelines to seem to back them up. There are no electronic barriers yet, no scan in only entrances, but they tell us its coming. While at the same time showing us videos from China allegedly of people finally having had enough of their stupid games and said electronic ‘prison’. And we have videos from the same country showing thousands being led away to ‘covid camps’. A whole bunch had their QR codes turned yellow at a station, preventing them all from leaving. Sounds really convenient, doesn’t it? Or a strange game they want everyone to play.
Also, kind of sounds like kidnap, or false imprisonment to hold people against their will for no wrong doing whatsoever. And the whole idea of being monitored through your phone is quite creepy too (apparently you can’t leave your house in China without one, although I’m sure that’s mainly in cities, if they have everyone in them by now). Even worse now with the idea of them wanting to put a chip in your head, like a stalker, or abusive person in your life, that needs to know where you are, all the time. But weirder than that, they insist on being in your bank account, medical records, your conversations, your thoughts. Extreme level stalking/paranoia/control disorder going on there, but because it is a corporation doing it, for some reason people aren’t concerned. And not a faceless corporation I might add, they have their emotive marketing campaign in full swing, using familiar faces, and slogans and props to steer the collective thoughts where they need them to go, until they have their ‘direct link’ into your brain of course, then it’s a different story.
We comment as people all the time how captive animals aren’t happy, even the ones who appear to have a ‘really good simulated habitat’ are still missing out on really being themselves. They are beholden to the hand that feeds them, because they are not allowed to feed themselves. Sound familiar? Just because we can’t see the bars, or the fences and barriers, we somehow believed they weren’t there. Clever. They are invisible social, racial, financial and economic barriers they use for us instead, to give the illusion of being free. That’s where The Matrix was right, the illusion of freedom is the construct they have used to enslave us and strangely what we are fighting to save it seems from the next deeper level of enslavement. But deep down we know something isn’t right, and in fact know it is very wrong indeed…
Let’s talk about the chips. It’s been on the cards for years, talked about and vaguely implemented by way of RFID chips in Sweden, although when I checked up on that a few years ago, the media were saying the uptake wasn’t that high, but it was working well in those that had it. Of course they would say that, but since there has been talk of digital ID’s, strangely I haven’t heard much at all about over there, I would have thought it would be a model example of how it could work. But, Sweden has it’s other issues currently, despite avoiding restrictions and not being terribly afflicted by that, it seems their stability isn’t quite what it once was. None of ours is, over Europe, the Commonwealth, the world. Yet before, we managed to get a rather slick system in place, with only pieces of paper and motivation. Seems all this technology in the race to speed us up, has actually greatly slowed us down. And not content with just chips in you hand or wrist, for ‘ease of scanning in’ to everything, they now want to put them directly into your brain circuitry. I have written before about it in At the flick of a switch, but it seems now it is moving along. Seeking FDA approval for it to commence on humans (like it hasn’t already), moving up from the monkeys. As you can imagine, the testing process wouldn’t have been voluntary, or kind. But they seem hell bent in being in our heads and getting inside people, literally. And many can’t help wondering why and for what purpose.
So far, from what we have seen, none of their objectives are good, or healthy, or for anyone’s safety, apart from their own perhaps. But how it could all tie together is what maybe some are overlooking, or not, who can say what people are really up for these days. It seems a step further towards creating that hybrid they seem so keen on, an integrated human, directly connected to the machine, to a system they have created and want subjects for. I see it as the next level of overall simulation perhaps, like in Inception when they keep dropping down a dream level, being monitored and having their reality induced. Just a thought. But potentially Graphene Oxide, could be an integral component, as with 5G, because they do all seem to be important for the tech world they envisage for everyone. As GO has magnetic properties, I speculate that if you can infiltrate the body with it, then you can physically manipulate your subject, and even immobilise them, from a distance. Hold them in place with magnetic barriers, as in once you are in the a ‘smart city’, you physically can’t get out, even if you want to. A new twist on an open prison type thing. It seems clear though, they are trying to overwrite and rewrite our internal workings, systems and mechanisms, as you would with a computer if you wanted to upgrade its system perhaps. But not all the hardware is compatible with the new software they are trying to write in, which is where maybe we have fatalities or injuries occurring. Where the bodies natural systems are identifying the invasion and trying to fight it, a battle for life itself is happening internally. That’s just me wondering about what is going with all the quite horrifying stories of vaccine injuries, blot clots, people just dying suddenly, cardiac arrests with no warning, neurological problems, etc. The list is long, and not entirely unexpected from my point of view. I gave thought to what the purpose was of the spike protein when hearing about it, remembering that it was a misfolded spike protein replication that was associated with CJD, so I had my suspicions.
But what we are told, and what occurs are often slightly different, but sometimes not really enough to notice, if you aren’t paying attention. With one hand they tell you it will keep you safe, your money secure, but in reality, it will make you monitored and part of their points system. Where people become the products to be shipped around, barcoded, scanned, bought and sold, for whatever purpose they see fit. Just as products are developed for the market, so have we been. Moulded to fit the requirement at the time, need skilled workers? Train people and educate them. Need manual workers, enslave them and keep them down. Brave New World had it sussed, with the structure of usefulness and knowing your place. But what they don’t say with that saying ‘know your place’, is that someone has set that place for you, like a plate at a table. Know your place means someone has set you up to have a place, and some people like that, evidently. Being told what to do, where to do, who to talk to, how to act, how to feel must make some people feel secure, and not trapped like the rest of us. Because if there wasn’t someone filling in all that life for you, you would have to do it yourself, and take full responsibility for yourself, and lots of people either don’t know how, or don’t want to. It’s sad to see, handing their valuable time and life to a corporation to be their ‘parent’.
Holding us back looked at what I saw as the infantilisation of people. And maybe this is what it was for, so they could easily sweep people into their meta verse corporate world, which would appear to be a very sterile, ordered, joyless, crappy version of real life. And one that would appear to be dependent on getting people chipped, or systematically catalogued into the system, and monitored thereafter. You can’t deny that a perfect way to do that would be to use a nano chip, by way of an injectable substance, suddenly being made a requirement under the guise of a ‘pandemic’, that would definitely move their plans along. And I am reminded of at the start of this substance roll out, whether real or not, I considered these pieces of ‘evidence’ and how they might fit. Firstly, people saying that the injection site was magnetised, and a few vids of spoons being held to an arm or other metal objects, and sticking for more than a second or two. I personally saw one, on a friends phone of her relative doing it, so I considered it more than I would from just internet talk. Also tying into my idea about people being magnetised so they can be physically restricted without having to be touched. The second was just internet talk and vids, but of there suddenly being an awful lot of coded Bluetooth signals within range of lots of people. And some people testing it, on people not carrying a phone, so it was presumed that lots of people are now emitting a signal each with a unique identifier code. Again, wouldn’t that be handy if you wanted to track everyone, and pretend that ‘test and trace’ was really about a phone app, but instead it was the project to get everyone ‘chipped’ that they could. And that’s why it really cost so much, they just pretended it was on an app, and all the money just disappeared and publicly say it was a failure. Getting two birds with one stone, substance and chip in one. Perhaps, and just something else to mull over in these rather crazy times we find ourselves in…
MKW Publishing 