
(c) K Wicks

(c) K Wicks
There seems to be much debate at the moment over what it is to be a Woman, and that people suddenly seem unable to define what that is and how it differs from a Man. And equally, I’m sure we will have issues with the word man soon as well, because you know. Equality. Even in confusion apparently, we should be equal. However, it is an odd reality to see grown men, and yes, women, trying and find words to use other the perfectly good ones we already have in use. The fact that a small group of society, who are not women, try to make it a taboo word, isn’t going down too well. And correctly so, it seems a rather deviant and shifty move to try and commandeer the term woman and what goes with it, while at the same time trying to stop it being used in its applicable context. From where I am sitting, it looks a lot like ‘imitate to infiltrate’ and is not for any good purpose. And it’s odd, to want to be accepted as something you are actively trying to erase, shout down and not allow as they are, as if the majority don’t see it as a tactic of just getting your own way, in the game of society. Acceptance needs to be within yourself and should never be expected from anyone else, or required. Be happy in your own skin they used to say, until suddenly they had ways to make lots of money in offering you ‘new skin’, in the form of make-up, clothes, jewellery, cosmetic surgery, lifestyle, etc. Money, money, money. If they couldn’t make any money from all this, do you think they would be in the slightest bit interested if someone felt sad, or depressed, or at odd with themselves internally. And do you think, that once they realised they could encourage those things in people, and it would make them lots of money, that they just shook their head and said, oh no, we couldn’t do that, it would be unethical?
We are a product of our environment they say, and I guess they gave it away with the wording. We are a product to them, to be manipulated and steered at every possible opportunity for the benefit of their profits. I’ll share another paragraph from the book I am reading to give you an idea of just what they think of us, and how they went about spending billions of dollars, just to work out how to make us spend more money and consume more. Sounds ridiculous doesn’t it, but like they say, you’ve got to spend money to make money.
The Hidden Persuaders – “Thus it was that merchandisers of many different products began developing a startling new view of their prospective customers. People’s subsurface desires, needs, and drives were probed in order to find their points of vulnerability. Among the subsurface motivating factors found in the emotional profile of most of us, for example, were the drive to conformity, need for oral stimulation, yearning for security. Once these points of vulnerability were isolated, the psychological hooks were fashioned and baited and placed deep in the merchandising sea for unwary prospective customers”.
Quite shocking really, but not surprising. They have been working out who you are before you even knew, helping to steer and shape the desired outcome, check out my other article Nudge, nudge for a little more on current methods being used to force compliance in a more communistic approach.
But back to the current issue about the ability to use words that have a meaning, because some people don’t like the meaning or definition, because it doesn’t define them. Like I said, odd times. To me it’s like insisting you join a chess club, then moan all the time about the people playing chess, and start insisting they should be playing darts. So, instead of being logical and joining the darts club, or starting one, they bully and hound the chess players until they either give up and leave, or give in and stop playing chess and start playing darts. It might seem like a silly analogy, but that is how it seems. And I won’t lie, there appears to be an awful lot of issues towards women, coming from people who claim to want to be one. And by trying to dismiss concerns around it only seems to confirm there is a problem, otherwise it would be a normal open discussion or debate.
But are we just the sum of our sex, our sexual interests and our anatomy? Does that completely define who we are as they are telling us it should? We seem rather stuck on the perception of the external presentation of ourselves, trying very desperately in some cases to convey on the outside what is on the inside. I wonder why that is. And why it seems to be pushed as a dominating agenda in the public mainstream, encouraging that people need to be validated because of who they are, whatever that should be. But why? It is not important to me that people see on the outside how I feel on the inside, I am not a greenhouse. Showing your emotions is one thing, or wearing your heart on your sleeve as they used to put it, but trying to be a see-through entity that everyone can and should know and fully understand by just looking at you, is weird. And some people having, what appear to be full-blown tantrums or mental breakdowns in public (and private I guess), and displaying very aggressive language and threats sometimes, because someone mis-labelled their exterior in their view, is just too far out, beyond the realms of normal and severely lacking in any etiquette. Are they of such a limited emotional capacity that they simply cannot cope when encountering a normal interaction in the ordinary society most of us know or a differing view to their own? Or are they genuinely expecting everyone else around them just know what they are doing, how they are feeling, what they trying to be? And that goes for anyone who is trying to externalise their inner self, and then expects people around them to ‘act accordingly’ to pander to it, and I guess, stroke their ego, or alter-ego as may be the case in some instances.
Now more than ever is it important to know who you are and how you feel, not because someone told you to, or because you are expected to, but because you know it within yourself. Because as I have written above, there are forces at play looking to find, exploit and manipulate your vulnerabilities, just for the purpose the Consumerism.

(c) MKW Publishing

(c) K Wicks
You cannot make people see something, and despite all that has happened and been revealed of late, a number of people still seem blissfully unaware of what is going on around them. Wilful ignorance I believe this is, and has always been rife, but now it’s causing real issues in society.
I will also use the term many seem to want to mock, and use to try and belittle people – Conspiracy Theory/Theorist, because it really does seem there is doubt for some about what has occurred, and they are unaware who the joke is on when they say it.
Just to be clear about the meaning of those two words, as they seem to get misused a lot.
Conspiracy = a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful.
Theory = not yet proven
So, I will tackle things as they are, and refer to how I saw things before this. Some people think it’s awfully funny to take the piss out of someone, but when they turn out to be right, who are you really taking the piss out of? Ah yes, yourself. And I also understand that using the term seems a bit outdated, when it is clear what is taking place so no longer a conspiracy or a theory. But as they latched onto the term without knowing really what it was, they hold onto it, not seeing what it hides.
I have spent years noticing nefarious projects, ideas and strategies, and have been called cynical, suspicious and a conspiracy theorist before, by my own family no less. But the words being used as a deterrent or a jibe didn’t work because it didn’t change what I saw, it just meant I knew other people didn’t see it, want to see it and sometimes were actively avoiding reality to not see it.
And I get it, nobody really wants to admit there is a rather large group of people or even just one person, with resources beyond our imagination and a terrifying ideology, that have been and are playing with our lives. For profit mainly it would seem, and boredom perhaps. I guess it’s easy to imagine there might be one person at school or at work that tries to make your life a misery. But what if it was the whole school, or company, all the teachers, employees, and the pupils, and the committees and panels. That’s how it’s appearing now in society. A far reaching, high-level system where you are intertwined and your life is already steered by it. That really isn’t a secret, or a theory.
However, it appears by way of publicly available evidence from a number of sources, that we have been part of a social, financial, emotional and pharmaceutical project/experiment for quite some time now. Spanning back decades and finds its way to you through some area of life, and now it feels as though it’s starting to come together for them, sort of. But in a way, it’s like they are trying to pull a drawstring bag closed, full of different sized marbles. But the sides aren’t quite in line, they aren’t quite sewn up, and it’s starting to sway and tilt, the marbles starting to split the seams of the bag where they are loosely attached. And if you don’t get it, we are the ‘marbles’, they are the ‘bag’.
It’s like they have an overwhelming need to control and dictate your daily functions of life, from ‘cradle to grave’. That saying which was encouraged from when they started to create the NHS (The Beveridge Report), to give you the illusion they are there to look after you, to care for you. Well, now they want to be your parent and guardian, stepping it up from just a benign background support, they want in now, on all of it. Your life, thoughts, feelings, money, family, desires, etc. Through digital currency and ID it seems, to pull all that information together they have been gathering about people. Information is power they say.
But the chain of events that led us here, to now, started way back, a hundred years ago at least, longer if you subscribe to certain other events being orchestrated as part of the long game plan which led us here. Some people have very good foresight, and patience. Keep that in mind if you think there is no way it could be that long in the planning. And there are so many things that tie in, and are part of it, that it really is too much for many to explain, understand or fully appreciate. All we can do is try…

(c) K Wicks

(c) K Wicks
Kill switches – probably not just for cars. If they have worked out how to install a chip into a human’s circuitry which they apparently have with brain chips, then they surely would have thought of a handy mechanism to be able to switch it off. Like the cars and machinery, we’ll be subject to the same limitations. Seeming more and more like logans run every day, because with a ‘kill switch’ comes the ability to decide when someone needs to expire, in their view. Suddenly seems easier to imagine how they could limit everyone to 30 years doesn’t it?
Also, if you have a chip, or something say, magnetic implanted, maybe that’s how people could be kept in ‘smart cities’. There will be a physical barrier you cannot cross or your implant explodes, or could just simply hold you there. Sounds like nightmare science fiction, but is it really fiction?
There was talk at the beginning of the mrna drive, that there would be chips or devices implanted via the vaccines. A few people shared apparent videos of Bluetooth ID’S showing up on people after jabs, and magnetic capabilities at the injection site. Whether real or not I followed the thought .
What if the purpose of it, if real, is to firstly monitor everyone. Give people a ‘code’ on their first shot, then you can monitor each subject and each ‘upgrade’ they deliver with each shot. The fatalities are possibly where the system or host is not compatible with the technology being written in, or can’t adapt quick enough. So faulty, expires, dies. Others will be integrating it, and maybe they are looking for the ‘one’ who can withstand the technology implants fully, to really create a fully functioning cyborg. If they haven’t already.
There is also the possibly of using the signal to that code for other purposes, or there may be other programmes running in different people, like a set of instructions, but not the same for all. And with that maybe, you could control/trigger vast numbers of seemingly unconnected people to behave in a certain way of the programmers or controller’s choosing.
Example – rage. I will use a movie reference here again, 28 Days Later. The reason I think of it isn’t because of a zombie in the normal sense, covered in my article Zombies, perhaps? But more along the lines of how that film presented it, as a virus (as did Resident Evil). But recently I saw an article about how some scientists ‘accidently’ turned some hamsters into angry rage filled creatures by doing some gene editing. And well, these recent gene therapies being masqueraded as vaccines could well be editing in something they apparently did not foresee. Or did, who can be sure.
But if you can activate a large group or multiple individuals at once, and control say, anger, or fear, or confusion at the flick of a switch, what exactly could be done with that? Give it thought, because they will have. And some videos are emerging currently of people having what can only be described as a weird episode, before they appear to fall to the floor in a type of rigor mortis type state. It could be they are suddenly aware of the system editing taking place, they hear/see things, and then short circuit. Who knows, it’s a thought in progress so I’m still working on that theory. Or the videos may just be further fear propaganda, either way, both options are being considered and I will continue to give thought to what appears to be going on. Technology is not being used as an ally here, and we would do well to remember it.

(c) K Wicks

(c) K Wicks
It’s been a barrage of psychological techniques and manipulations to achieve desired outcomes. But let’s look at who that was and what those desired outcomes were because this isn’t just theory, this was used against people in their everyday lives.
As this whole lockdown debacle started, it was noted on a few posts online that there was a document going round which appeared to show a psychological strategy for, well, to put it plainly, scaring the shit out of people. That’s the non-technical term for it, they called it a ‘Nudge Unit’. A team of behavioural scientists and specialists who were tasked with working out how to turn you against people, how to manipulate your feelings with the use of wording and incentives. You might have heard of them, part of the Independent Sage group they were, also in that group was Neil Ferguson, famous for being wrong on many occasion spanning decades, yet his projections were used as the basis for much of the societal procedures that were followed. But the people behind the behaviour, ones like Susan Michie being put forward as the face of reason, despite heavy ties to communism and the CCP’s way of thinking. It should have been clear for many to see, that these people did not have ours, or societies best interests at heart. That all these groups usually tie back to the overall industries and foundations that fund them, that fund getting a certain message across. Fear and compliance. I covered some of the techniques used in The three D’s of conversion under coercion but it’s more than that.
Those people, and other government departments sat down and deliberately decided to instil fear in people, whether it was necessary or not. A cruel and continuous process of heaping mental pressure and stress on them, knowing many wouldn’t cope, deliberately splitting up families, letting people die alone just so they could get their ‘desired result’. Fear and compliance. Because it is much easier to blindside people and lead them astray when they are frightened or worried. But still it is an engineered response. Decide what you want to happen, then place triggers and reminders to condition people to accept that outcome, the one you have chosen for them. Like I said, cruel.
And the repercussions of which we are now witnessing. With countless vaccine injuries, more mental health issues for people, grief of not seeing loved ones in the final days or months, economic impact, all still happening with more being piled on every day. Food crisis, money collapsing, new viruses, war. It’s sounds ridiculous, doesn’t it? And it is, because it’s meant to be so outrageous and overwhelming, that you won’t have time to take it all in. They want you to be pulled this way and that, to not know what’s coming next, to not relax and gather yourself. Headless chickens are what they want. There is a saying I have thought of often in this, the first line from Rudyard Kipling’s If,
“If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs and blaming it on you…”

(c) K Wicks

(c) K Wicks
The name of the book should give it away really, what its purpose was. The Doomsday Book. Also known as the Great Survey (there’s that word again, great). Created over 1,000 years ago in 1086, it was the first step towards where we are now in my mind. A register, where everybody in the land of England was visited (apparently), and all their assets, property, land etc were listed, so they could be taxed or taken off them. And tax people they did, for various things over those years, working out that it wasn’t enough to only take on the main things, they needed to reduce people’s wealth, while at the same time as increasing theirs, same shit different day.
We’ve had window tax, that many have heard of and you can still see the remnants of that time, with bricked up windows and seeing where they once were. That’s the only reason I had heard of it, I asked as a child why there were bricked up windows in so many old buildings.
Another one I learnt of in the last few years, was hearth tax. Yes, they actually taxed you on how many fireplaces you had, or places to heat food, meaning you could have more than one family in a house, yep, tax ’em. Suddenly films like Robin Hood don’t seem so far-fetched, well, maybe the bit about someone standing up to the establishment and getting things back in order, but not about the taxes on the poor. That bit is very true, and of barons and lord of the manor, we still have them today.
In these modern times though, they have been stealthily been putting together their digital doomsday database, of what you have and what you are. But is it just for taxes this time? They talk of you owning nothing and being happy, so how exactly are they going to go about achieving that for you? We have the 10 year census which gives them all sorts of household and personal information, they can access your bank if they want, which shows them your financial life, they can check your insurance which tells how much you have within your house and how much your possessions are worth, they know your political history through voting records, or lack thereof. They know what you learn and are educated with at school and university, they know your medical history and family situation usually. They can see what you buy at the supermarket if you have a points card and use a digital transaction for it, they know where you socialise when you use your card, and who you mix with and what you say if you do it via social media or your phone. They know what you watch, when you watch it, what you play, how long you play for, what makes you stressed, what makes you happy, when you get ill etc. It’s a lot, isn’t it? Has anyone in your entire life ever known that much about you? Or you about them?
But all the above doesn’t in itself mean something nefarious is going on, even though it is no secret they spent billions of dollars in the 50’s and in subsequent decades on psychological research to manipulate and change people’s habits and needs to make them that way. What does seem to be revealing the nefarious side of it all, is what is now being proposed which involves all of the above. The drip feeding of what they would like to happen by way of digital control of your life, and what’s more terrifying than what they propose, is that lots of people don’t seem in the slightest bit bothered by it. But that could just be a result of the constant programming that occurs to try and make people more compliant. Check out my article Consumerism for a little more on that.
They want to dictate what you can own, if you can have a house, or a job, what you can eat and your food allowance, they want to decide if you are mentally and physically healthy. They want to tell you what is correct, and what is wrong, how to think and what to think. Individuality, choice and free thought seems to a real thorn in their sides. Not for the benefit of the people, but for the benefit of their systems and profits. And in order to maintain that and steer it where they want it to go, they need to herd people along a certain path. It’s happened before, just in a more analogue way.
After the first doomsday book, over the coming times they restricted people, wrote new laws, boundaries, land agreements, taxes, systems of order to control people. Creating slums and low wages between themselves to keep people in their place, if any section or peoples appear to be getting too rich or too smart for the liking of the others, they are removed, or discredited, or social strife is created to change the direction. Wealth gets taken and redistributed to those who want to keep it from others, neatly illustrated these last few weeks with the changing of the monarch here in the UK. An article titled “The royal family put into law in 1993 that they won’t have to pay inheritance tax, so it doesn’t erode their wealth”. And there you have it, clear as day, your wealth is up for grabs, but theirs isn’t? And that people, is how the rich got very rich, not by working harder, but by keeping more and taking yours. Convenient disasters also clearing the way for them, industrial advances giving reason to clear out the countryside a bit, herd people into cities with the ideas of wealth and fortune. ‘The streets are paved with gold’, and people believing in being able to make something of themselves with the opportunities of the city. Not so in many cases, it’s the same then as it is now, it’s who you know, not what you know. But those ideas were put out there because it served a purpose, they want people to move around and relocate, but when it suits them. Forced relocations have been a thing, all over the world, for the longest time. Ireland, apparently during the great famine of 1845, it wasn’t just the lack of potatoes that caused the issue, the royalty at the time kept exporting food out of Ireland, they deliberately starved all those people, and encouraged more to leave. Scotland, we had the Highland clearances, only learnt about those fairly recently in life too, but again, families and generations of people forcibly moved. They say some of the Klan leaders were in on it, bought out by greed, they increased the land rent to the point of being unsustainable to force people out. It worked. They crippled people lives and way of life, just to have some land, and more money and power. Sad really that it has been going on for so long, but if you want to know how the UK came to be as it is today, I think it’s important to try and look back over how we got here.
Enslavement is not progress for us, but it may well be for the people who wish it upon us. So, when they talk of technological advances and progress, they talk of their world. For us it will be restricted living and being nothing but a resource for someone else and their way of life, and you must understand, both ways of life cannot co-exist it would seem, which is why one must go. Technology can still be used for good, I do believe that, but not when wielded at the hands of madman and their mercenaries.

(c) K Wicks