The attack on farmers continues, and how our food is produced, transported, sold and consumed. All neatly tied up by rules, regulations, quotas and targets. Under the guise of ‘for the planets health’ because, you know, they’ve already used it towards people and too many lapped it up. Imagine handing someone a strait-jacket and they put it on themselves and let you tie it up. That’s what’s happening here.
It’s a slow strangulation of resources and current sustainability. Lots of people have noticed, and aren’t having it, and rightly so. Covered previously in It seems an attack, Because from what they seem to be trying to roll out is worse, won’t work and will ruin the systems and land already in place. Which is the point. Farmland being appropriated for other use, orders for rewilding and paid culls on the horizon. Mysterious fires of wheat fields, food processing plants and no doubt they will declare more animal-based infections and cull loads more. It takes out a huge part of the food chain we rely on, while they simultaneously stop processes in other areas. They will have their own islands, areas and compounds where everything is just fine. But for everyone else, they want to upset the applecart.
And while they slowly try to remove the word, livelihood and previous terms associated with farmer, it gets replaced with a new ‘feeder’. Big pharma, wanting to pump you full of chemical food, needing medications to survive and for them to be the new cradle to grave overseer. So far, they have just been the nanny for a few decades (like the one in The Hand that Rocks the Cradle), quietly assisting and watching, waiting. Now making their move, when ‘suddenly’ there is a huge need for pharmaceutical intervention with lots of adverse reactions to the recent trials on the mostly unsuspecting populations in various countries.
But it seems a small chance of hope is spreading, farmers are following the initial lead of the truckers and trying to fight back by way of protest. All the industries as we know them will be obsolete if they have their way. Just robots doing everything with minimal people contact and interaction. Or at least that’s the picture they paint of what they are shooting for. There appears little or no room for normal everyday people just getting on with their lives in their vision, so it should be a concern for everyone where this is all going. Because it doesn’t look like it’s going anywhere good…
A further look at the way our digital prison is trying to encircle us. Covered already in previous articles, but as it continues, so does the observation of it.
This is an updated look, seen as things are still moving along at quite a pace. New staffless shops being revealed, robots in place of people in factories, robotic dogs shown marching in formation, some with weapons loaded on them. You know, all totally normal for a harmonious ordinary functioning society. But today I have read through a few comments of the reality for some starting to hit home, women in particular after a certain move by a certain social media company a few weeks ago in the states. Showing people what the consequences are of sharing very personal information online, and giving rise to finally understanding that ‘private messages’ are only so to a point. Imagine someone being able to eavesdrop on every conversation you have ever had, and were ever going to have, omnipotence of a godly nature hanging over you. Many are close to it, as they share most of their lives online, publicly and privately, but when it’s all online, maybe there is no difference in the two.
With microphones in telephones and TV’s, they don’t even need to bug people’s homes anymore. We invited the devil in ourselves, paid for it, gave our time to it, and still do. The saying ‘you have nothing to fear, if you have nothing to hide’ is apt here, or would have been if the game was fair. Alas, it isn’t. Or they would have cracked down and stopped all the nefarious online activities that flourished as they were given free reign. Now being used as a weapon against normality to monitor everyone, while still not curbing anything.
The latest move bringing charges in a home abortion case, using messages between a mother and daughter to prove something. Women have rightly pricked up their ears on this and have started to think it through. Whether the girl was right or wrong isn’t the issue, it’s about privacy. Why people had apps to monitor their cycle is beyond me, I didn’t even like having a calorie app for a day for the idea that it was then recorded somewhere. By who? For what? No need. Population, pregnancy and the future of humanity have featured in many a storyline and I wonder sometimes if it’s a head up, speculated upon in They Tell Us.
But it really does seem as though they want to know what you think, what you eat, what you feel, where you go, when you travel, where you travel, who you talk to, what you say. They have access to most of that with lots of people, freely given to them on a daily basis, and that wouldn’t be an issue ordinarily. Like people said, ‘I’m very boring, why would they want to monitor me?’. And that is right, and monitoring all by itself wasn’t important, yet the overall point of what it leads to was for me. Why do they want all that info? In my mind, it would lead to being able to control those things. And here we are. Because while it wasn’t so much an issue before, now it is. Because they want to decide things about you and for you (and those around you), based on that monitoring.
There is also a big push and lots of restructuring going on around medicine. They want that all online too. Monitored appointments, checked and reviewed, doctors and patients alike will feel the scrutiny. This is where the idea that they are implanting digital tracers in people would come into play. They could monitor your heartbeat, circulation, location, intake of calories etc all from an internal sensor. They keep saying they want to integrate people with their phones, and they are already a beacon on us. Once fully integrated, we will be the data. They make no secret of that being a goal. To augment humans and machine to create something weird and seemingly not necessary. But as history and the present shows us, just because we can, does not mean we should…
It turns out, there have been many instances of cities in the sky, or fata morgana as they have been named. I only knew on one in China a few years back, but seems there have been others. Charles Fort collected a number of tales as below and detailed in his book New Lands.
In October of 1796 a mirage of a walled town had been seen distinctly for half an hour at Yougal in Ireland. Again upon March 9th 1797 in Yougal had been seen a mirage of a walled town.
In June of 1801 a mirage of an unknown city, It was seen for more than an hour. A representation of mansions surrounded by shrubbery, with forests behind.
October 10th 1881 that at Rugenwalde, Pomerania now Poland and Germany the mirage of a village had been seen in the sky, Snow covered roofs from which hung icicles.
On June 29th 1882 over lake Orsa in Sweden, representations of steam ships had been seen in the sky, and an island covered with vegetation.
March 12th 1890 at 4pm in the sky of Ashland, Ohio was seen a representation of a large unknown city.
Early in June 1897 in the Yukon in Alaska, A city had been seen in the sky, The description of this city is that it looked like some immense city from the ancient past.
On Feb 17th 1901 it is said Indians of Alaska had told of the occasional appearance of city, appearing suspended in the sky, description by visitors to this area, we could see plainly houses, well defined streets, here and there rose tall spires over huge buildings, which appeared to be ancient mosques and cathedrals. More like an ancient European city.
August 2nd 1908 at Ballyconneely on the coast of Ireland, was seen a phantom city, of different sized houses, in different styles of architecture, visible for over 3 hours.
And in 2015 there was a sighting and video footage in China of one.
Hard to know for sure what is going on up there, but interesting none-the-less.
I was bound to get round to an article of this nature eventually. I have been mulling over myths, monsters and legends for over 30 years now. And although having previously accepted that these things were fantasy and fictional, rational thought and more research has now made me rethink that presumption. I’ll mention a few and how they fit into today’s landscape for me.
Giants and titans – we have had stories and tales of giants for our entire history. The book of Genesis mentions them, all old stories and legends have them at some point, and we even have modern tales of them. But what if they were real? Giant trees and other huge animals show there has been a time before of a greater size than now. Jack and the beanstalk spring to mind here. There have been whispers and stories of a land above ours, as well as below, so could it be that they were or are on land, just not the one we inhabit?
Olympics, gods and competition – they say we are made in gods image and compete to be the best. But what if we aren’t the best that’s ever been. We just try to emulate and replicate it as best we know how. We try to be the strongest, fastest, jump the highest, but only a much smaller scale than once was. Maybe.
Leviathan, mermaids, cracken – monsters and mysteries of the oceans have always been with us as long as we have been seafaring I should imagine. But where did they start? Did we have gigantic ‘monsters’ lurking in the depths of the seas? Could it be that from those strange times and great upheavals of the past there were things different from us as we know ourselves now. But maybe we were different back then too.
Vampires – it’s no secret we have historical references throughout most cultures to blood sacrifices or drinking blood. But is there any truth in it? There’s talk of young blood rejuvenating older people in mainstream articles now, so it’s not something they are trying to hide. All the movies and books of that nature had to be prepping us for something didn’t they?
Odin, Middle earth, Ragnarök – this one is interesting to me as it seems to overlap with the giants, and involves an end of days event which hold some weight to our current path in time. They have a land in their legends called Niflheim during a period called the Great Void (there is the word ‘great’ again, possibly a marker as I suspect in my previous article, There’s nothing great about it. But the word is awfully close to Nephilim, a giant race from Enoch’s time and a cross between the fallen angels and humankind. Funny how it starts to weave in to other things, or you realise where those other legends and tales may have come from.
We often dwell in the past, and for certain things, I think it is necessary and can help you to understand where we are and where this is all going…
I am going to talk about clouds. Specifically what has become known as chemtrails. I personally don’t remember seeing very straight lines like this 20 or 30 years ago, despite spending lots of time outdoors, looking at the sky and being interested in meteorology. I liked hurricanes, lightning, weather patterns and topography, just for fun. Learning the names of the types of clouds as best I could and taking pictures of them once I got into photography.
Now there seems to be an awful lot of lines. Like spiderwebs in the sky. And others have noticed and think it is of note, as have I. However, there seems to be a lot of ridicule placed upon those who would question this. Its not really so outrageous to think that the government would spray something dangerous into the atmosphere. They have done it before.
Over the years they have done various things and created technologies to ‘assist’ they say. There is a system called HAARP for auroral research, and various patents involving weather modification technology. Spain admitted to changing the weather in 2015 to stop rain, China cloud seeded to keep the weather clear for the Olympics they say, causing huge flooding in Nepal. Tasmania even did some, just before a storm – although they say it had no effect. The question was asked though, why would you try and make rain clouds, just before a huge rainstorm had already been forecast? Yet people are seen as crazy for seeing that as enough of a pattern to question things and remain suspicious. Especially when they appear to be using every bit of weather for the purposes of shouting climate change, it seems even more reason to question.
Of course, it may well be nothing, and they are just normal clouds. But when the unelected meddlers start talking of chalking out the sun, or putting huge reflectors or bubbles into space to block out the full rays, you have to wonder. Don’t you?
All this haze and lines, not every day, but that almost makes it weirder. Same conditions, same flight paths (mostly) yet not same result. That’s the only reason I question it. And no I don’t know the full atmospheric conditions or height and distance of the aircraft when they are passing. But something isn’t right, and I will continue to review it and question it as needed.
It seems that the world is intent on splitting up after years of apparently trying to come together. Despite their call for a one world government and unified global project, they seem to do the opposite of what they say, so could they really be looking to divide it up instead? Under the guise of climate change currently, but first it was the ‘pandemic’ that threatened to cut us all off, but it didn’t quite work out that way for all, but some countries still are following that MO (Canada and New Zealand). But there is much emphasis now being put on travel. The fuel, the emissions, the cost, to the planet apparently. Yet it seems rather clear and hypocritical that most (if not all) of the unhinged people shouting for it, travel the most and in the most elaborate fashion. The latest funny article being that the people who recently heckled a political event, have extensive travel pictures splashed all over their social media pages. As long as people are aware that ‘activists’ usually have an agenda as ridiculous as the people they claim to be fighting then you know to ignore them too. Two sides of the same coin.
But for some, travelling is a lifestyle, or a dream they look forward to, and one that is being used as a weapon against them, dangled as a carrot or treated as a special privilege. I knew they would do it quite some time ago, not how they would enact it, but that they would slowly restrict what you enjoy doing. Whatever that is. I was wrong about one thing though; they didn’t do it slowly. They took away everything all at once, and then drip fed it back. I had thought that bit through, and decided if you take certain things away from yourself, then they don’t get to do it, or control if you want it or not. Not everyone saw that coming, or wanted to believe the government would turn into the most overbearing, controlling and psychologically manipulative parent type. I guess if you have actually had a parent like that, it makes the signs easier to spot, even if the entity is a large corporation rather than an individual.
Travelling for now though is the main focus of control, major disruptions at big airports in various countries, some places doing testing, some places not having enough staff (remember they sacked loads for not complying). Canada being the first to demand an app be downloaded and used for entry, with a $6000 fine if you don’t comply, because you know, it’s for your health. They are so desperate to get everyone hooked up to a digital central system by way of health, food, finance, education, leisure etc and are actually like petulant children when it doesn’t go their way. You must stop travelling, you must eat bugs, you breath too much air and on and on. Except not for all though, is it? It has caught everybody’s attention that people are flooding in in to the UK via a small strip of water between us and France, and the US has an issue at the Mexican border apparently. These people appear to not be under the same laws, rules and regulations as everyone else, being allowed to just walk into a country and get given a new life at the expense of the people already there. It’s becoming very strange and the only logical conclusion appears to be a displacement of the current population, right under their noses. But I still feel that these newcomers have walked straight into a trap though, and that feeling I cannot shake.
The establishment do seem rather taken with the idea of that central system and point of all information though. Potentially they tried through the medium of ‘healthcare’ to get everyone on board. If they could have convinced everyone to get the jab, and download the app, job done. But they didn’t. So, is this just phase 2 of the plan, or a different approach? They still won’t get everyone though via travel abroad, as not everyone does it, and domestic travel would still not get everyone. So, is it really that are after in their end goal? Seems not. Or maybe they can manage with only a certain percentage hooked up. Every angle that appears has holes in it, and could be the sign of a plan that really isn’t in the bag and doesn’t have an end goal now because it’s got so messy. Or, it’s meant to appear that way and is part of the plan. Either way, all options need to be considered simultaneously until the truth is known.
I have no desire to travel whatsoever, although I have been lucky enough in my life to travel to a number of places, and live abroad a few times as well. Being somewhere else can be lovely, getting there is not. And as I have gotten older, it has become apparent to me that I find it very stressful and don’t particularly want to do it. Not so great if you have a partner that likes to travel, but that’s the way it goes. The way they have messed with each country though recently, each in a different way and now are being super weird about travel generally, I should imagine it’s become a very stressful process for many, if not all. It’s strange watching it all change, knowing I have been to places like the US and Canada, visited various countries in Europe, been to an African country and spent many years just being interested in various other countries, people, their economies and practices. It’s easy to see they are shafting everyone. Each taking their turn to be paraded by MSM as the next country to ‘fall’ into disarray and turn on itself. But they aren’t, Sri-Lanka seems to be in the firing line at the moment, they are giving them the squeeze. Fertilizer bans, sky-high fuel prices, government collapses – and guess what, they just happened to be ready to roll out an app to help allocate fuel to the worthiest, which of course affects everyone. They want the scenes we get fed from China, of people waving their phones at booths, desperate to show they have a ‘green code’ so they are allowed to jump, when told how high.
Some of us knew though they would try and control everything through travel, and that is coming to pass. Air travel being made difficult and they will try and introduce more delays and problems. Personal travel seems to be high on the list of attack now, screwing over fuel prices, making owning a car harder, with the view to eventually just stop you owning a car. The articles on that have now begun, suggesting it’s private car ownership that is now causing global climate issues – yet they have various modes of transport as we know in their rich club, so this is another ruse to get us to jump through their hoops, and leave us stranded, literally. No fuel and cars, no free people movement. If you live far away from your family and like to visit them, I would have a rethink about where you need to be in the future, just in case things start shutting themselves off, like entire countries. The way they are splitting and crashing economies seems like we are being moved into position for a corporate raid. We’ll see if we can work around their insanity or out manoeuvre them when it comes to the crunch. It seems as if the wheels aren’t as firmly on as they thought, or the rogue element is more disruptive than predicted, there’s a strange journey ahead, we’d do best to buckle up as they say…
There is a growing consensus that the simulation hypothesis may not be as far-fetched as once some may have thought. The way being paved for this through various films and ideas and as we gather more information about the apparent world around us and the construct upon which we base our ‘reality’. So, in my usual way, I shall use a list of films to illustrate how reality can and is determined by what’s around you. And by changing or simulating a different environment, can thereby change your reality and perceptions towards it.
The Matrix – so far this film is kind of heralded as the top spot for simulation theory played out in visual terms. It’s easy to understand, requires very little thought and appears to cover all bases. It’s too slick but a good starting point to get familiar with the idea.
Dark City – for me this film covers all bases and is neatly complex, it’s got psychological, physical, mental, metaphysical aspects and more.
Logans Run – This is a strange film, and has all sorts of overtones and undertones. But their reality is dictated and controlled and is no longer questioned.
Ready player one – an entertaining and fun look at the idea of a metaverse where it caters to your every want. Unless your want is to be able to fit in to normal life. It’s about finding out who you are by thinking you need to be someone else. Done in the classic Spielberg 80’s style, which I can’t fault.
Free guy – a recent film and goes even further into the computer programs running in the simulation touched upon in matrix. The replication of agent Smith, the fear of deletion by others. But this takes it further and goes with AI becoming sentient. An awareness of the system and programming develops leading to an evolution of thought. It’s a fun film though too and I recommend it. Easy viewing with lots of thinking material.
The Truman Show – a simulation of reality to convince one person it is. Meant to be portrayed as a reality TV show, but it’s a pretend sheltered fabricated existence. Until the party subject to the manipulation and lies snaps and realises all is not what it seems.
Star Trek – Next Generation – Many episodes involving the holodeck and varying degrees of simulated reality, but episode 138 of the series is very interesting.
Updated: realised I forgot two that should be in this list. Tron and lawnmower man. Both of those where people become part of the program.
Also, popular now as well as ‘reality tv’ are games simulating things. The Sims being aptly named and encourages people to build their ideal setting and characters. Tying into the metaverse possibly as an end game, who knows.
So, where does the simulation end and reality begin? Or once you believe the simulation is real, does that make it real? Are they just perceptions or absolutes? That will remain to be seen.
You may have guessed what the overall theme of this is by the title, if not, you will. Clowns have never sat well with me, and is the case for many I have learnt along the way. There may be various reasons for this, as the list of references below may reveal. But there is a crossover for me, into pantomime dames and other garish forms of ‘entertainment’ which use an overly exaggerated version of something, often in a stereotypical way, for you know, entertainment. But I have never found the representation of a ‘woman’ in these situations to ever be appealing or even funny. I cringe at panto stuff, but understand because of times past that apparently men were cast in the female roles for those things because women weren’t allowed on stage. Don’t get me wrong, when done correctly, men in drag or as dames can be hilarious and very on point. Some of my favourites being Monty Python, Kenny Everett and Lily Savage. So I decided it must be something else I am not enjoying about it, something not as obvious and which wasn’t funny.
The recent story time debacle going on has made me think about it and what it is that I personally don’t like or find comfortable about it, to revisit the theme as it seems remarkably similar in the way it is being presented. Just a bit of fun for kids. Firstly, I personally see no reason why you would need to dress up for story time, unless the outfit was appropriate to the story – i.e., Princess story = princess dress, dragon story, dragon outfit, relative to the activity and wouldn’t it be more fun to have the children also engage in dress up, after all, they enjoy it the most don’t they? Children can be very easily distracted and if they have something visual to look at kind of demanding their attention, then how much of the story is really going in anyway? But recently as the stories are being reported more and people protest to them taking place, I can’t help thinking the outfits and make-up of these ‘performers’ are really quite terrifying. I have been watching horror movies since I was a child, I know disturbing. Rather demonic and overwhelming on the senses in my opinion, and to a child who may take that imagery home with them, mull it over and give it lots of thought without any real context or understanding is a potential concern. To me anyway. Maybe not so much to others.
The reason I have an issue with garish presentation specifically being aimed at cashing in on children’s love of bright, sparkly, shiny colourful things, is because it’s been used before for nefarious purposes.
John Wayne Gacey – He was a serial killer in the 70’s who killed lots of young men. And one of his side hobbies was being part of a clown club, which gained him the name killer clown, but he didn’t kill as a clown. Interesting though is what he had said about why he enjoyed being a clown “acting as a clown allowed him to regress into childhood”. That is why it’s on this list.
IT – We should all know this clown Pennywise, either the original (to which I refer), or the remake, or the book. An awful and very scary depiction of a clown in full demonic mode. Enticing a child with a red balloon. Honestly, I thought about little Georgie for a long time after that.
McDonalds – Yes, the fast-food chain. Who’s main advertising tool was a clown, weird really for food. And food that has turned out to not be the healthiest, a slight leap from serial killers to bad nutrition, but neither are in the future interests of the child. Gratification and profit seem to be heading of the wheels of these machines.
Child catcher (chitty chitty bank bang) – Need I say more? Possibly not, but I will. Lollipops and music, to lure the children into the cage.
Hansel & Gretel – a gingerbread house and sweets to lure them in.
Pied Piper of Hamlin – music and dance to get the children to follow and be led to their abduction.
The last two may be Fairy Tales, but I believe there is always a thread of truth running through them too, as with movies and stories that remain with us. All of these things highlight a child’s tendency (and some adults too), to have their attention taken with something that seems bright and bouncy, but without knowing what is really going on. I don’t fully understand the need to expose school age children from nursery to secondary school to drag acts. I have read an account of a private school in the states that had a drag act sprung on them in church service. Heels and sequins parading up and down the aisle, for what purpose I cannot imagine. Why is it that we have a niche part of the adult entertainment industry suddenly being inserted into educational environments, religion and everyday society and events? It’s baffling to me.
What is also baffling, is how women have been slagged off and vilified for years for wearing heavy makeup, and what some consider to be inappropriate clothing but now it’s men doing it, that’s fine and we just clap and say well done. I really don’t get it. She’s a slapper or a prostitute for wearing that, but he’s a hero. Am I the only one thinking WTAF is going on here, are we actually in the Twilight Zone? Maybe it is just me that sees the overdoing of the outfits and makeup as a cover for something, whether they are hiding from themselves or something darker, that remains to be seen, but having to outwardly express yourself in such a garish manner, means you are compensating for something in my view. Why aren’t you comfortable as you? Why the extra razzle and dazzle? I just see painted faces and outfits pretending to be something, rather than it being an expression of self. I think I must be missing their whole point. How can you ever be you, if you are trying to be something or someone else?
A new way of breeding seems to be on the cards in the strange ideals of the rather disturbing international organisations.
You won’t have to procreate the old fashion way, indeed not. You can ‘spawn’ in an entirely detached way in the future apparently in their vision. Growing your offspring in a pod, in your living room no less. With monitors and a clear covering so you can watch it gestate. Maybe this is what the Tamagotchi things were really all about, prepping kids for a future where you will be inclined to ‘care’ for a virtual creation.
They appear to be doing a good job of desensitising people towards other people, animals, reality and so forth. Changing terms, definitions, meanings. Trying to go for things like birthing person, taking away the word mother and female associated words for things. I believe it’s to facilitate a detachment from being normal and doing normal natural things. The system appears to want to insert themselves in every person detail of your lives. But if they can get people before they are born, and manipulate the components, fully monitor the process and adjust as necessary, then you stand more chance of developing what they may consider a more appealing society.
Virtual babies maybe for some people, while they ‘train’ you to do it their way. All monitored of course, it will be remote and studied. You will be studied. The world around us is one big maze now, and we are the rats. They are building new puzzles, obstructions and incentives as we speak, constantly adapting as we do. But they really don’t seem to want us breeding like rats now do they? If you haven’t watched the films Logans Run and Dark City you should. And if you haven’t read Brave New World, you should. There is much to understand…