Unknown, But Try This

I’ve mentioned various things occurring which turned out to have a rather devastating effect instead of what it was meant to do, in An Experiment, But a Big One and it’s a subject many know of and gets brought up here and there. The scandal in the 50’s and 60’s of disabled babies being born with missing or malformed limbs. Thalidomide.

Quite shockingly, they didn’t even test it on any pregnant animals in their trials, they didn’t think it was a necessary part of the overall safety measures before rolling out a drug. Clearly. And even when something very disturbing started to occur, it seems it took some time for the culprit to be identified. It still strikes me as odd that women are told not to even eat soft cheese, or go near certain things in case it will have a harmful effect. Yet when it comes to certain medications, it is encouraged, like the aforementioned drug and other ones more recently. But that one it turns out, completely circumvents the protection usually given by the womb and what we would call natures defence. It is said that when they finally did think to test it on animals, the rabbits showed the same defects, although it is also said that rats tested after did not. Either way, the human live trial subjects definitely should have been the smoking gun, but no, it took a further five years after it was authorised, to be pulled.

It’s known as a teratogen now (can cause birth defects), but then it did not even seem to register as a possibility. I guess who could have known it would break down proteins that control when genes are turned on or off. So, they literally gave women something that would code the growing foetus to just switch off the limb development and bypass it altogether. It is said that depending on when you ingested the drug would affect the outcome, as after a certain number of weeks, the limbs have been ‘activated’ so I guess couldn’t then be switched off, but was only capable of preventing them from activating. But once it was obvious something was going very wrong, many are left to wonder what took them so long in identifying it what it was. I guess maybe it was only really looked into and admitted, because it cause just a profound and unhideable condition, that it was not going to work in the long term to cause harm.

But the damage was done, and perhaps is where some people may have just started to notice that the ‘health’ service, didn’t actually know what they were doing. It was best guess and live trials, as it is today, under the guise of ‘controlled study’. What they don’t really tell you often, is what they are looking for or want to achieve with these drugs they roll out, so many things that could or should be relevant gets overlooked, ignored or just dismissed. Just as we see today, people can receive an awful lot of flack for going against what the authorities say or for just questioning the reasoning behind something. And if they say it’s safe, then why would people think any different? Well, I’m glad some people did, and I’m sure there are those who at the time may have worked it out, told others and tried their best, but we know what they are up against with things like that.

But back to the drug, and in my mind I still don’t quite understand how you have a drug, originally developed as a tranquilizer suddenly then being sold over the counter for morning sickness without proper testing. As a sedative, it calms the nervous system, reduces voluntary activity, promotes sleep and is a hypnotic drug they say. Sounds just like the type of thing you would give to someone with a developing foetus growing inside them doesn’t it? It also sounds like with those ‘qualities’ it may have been quite helpful for other projects, perhaps the Monarch one for example with MK Ultra. See my article, Do You Mind, There’s Something To Control for more on that. But instead of having a number of queasy pregnant women at that time, I’m guessing you actually after that drug came out, you had a number of sedated, partially hypnotised women going about their day and lives with a supressed nervous system. But as long as they aren’t puking, eh?

And even stranger is, they don’t even know why morning sickness occurs. They have no clue as to why the body sees fit to create nausea and vomiting during that period in some people, but thought enough of it to try and supress it at the drop of a hat when presented with an opportunity, rather than assess the real cause of it and perhaps manage it from there. Mind-boggling really, but not, once you see how it really works, it seems like just another day in the giant lab…

Biology Prairie Regional Lab

(c) K Wicks

Liquid Black

It’s been doing the rounds in the fashion world, and has popped up now and again as a theme in film and fictional ideas. The black goo or liquid. I’ll note some of the references that have come together for this idea.

X-files – the film, and was where I first noted its use all those years ago. When the ancient site was discovered and the kid fell down into the hole, his eyes then being shown as glazed over by black liquid after he was infected by it.

Prometheus – a black liquid that had something living in it, or was entirely an organism, it’s not specified what exactly it is. Just theorised that it was part of our origin, or of the other beings shown in that film.

Graphene – if you have seen the videos of how it moves, then you will notice it has the appearance of a black liquid, or slightly thicker like putty almost.

Black oil photography – this is where it seems to have become mainstream. With all sorts of ‘celebrities’ and known faces having it used for effect. It does look odd, choosing to have what is an oil spill as part of something expected to be nice to the eye. It’s art darling, you know. But there are those who wonder about it not being about just art, and it isn’t just a cool gimmick to entice people to buy their magazine, or concept. That there is something quite a bit darker to it.

For a slightly more tongue in cheek one, I think of one of the Creep Show episodes from back in the day, of a black slick in water (which really just looked like binbags), which stalked and ate a bunch of teenagers who were trying to enjoy a day on the lake.

Venom – the films where it appears a black gooey substance is how the force manifests to take form.

To me I always just thought it was an odd look, to go for a black oil slick, or tar look as part of an aesthetic, making it look slimy and dirty, rather than pleasing. Although I guess that’s a matter of opinion, some may find the images attractive, rather than disturbing or bland. And all of the other representations of it mentioned above that fall into the ‘fictional’ realm, do not have good outcomes, so I can see why it’s of concern to some people. And as we know, these are some strange times upon us, where we often get shown in advance what creepy and disturbing things they would like people thinking about and seeing just like in any Show and Tell routine. Stay sharp people, looks like the creepy isn’t slowing down any time yet…

(c) MKW Publishing

Not Compatible

It seems that people are becoming less compatible with the environment as time goes on. Over the years hearing about various issues people have with things, food allergies, sunlight allergies, hearing about things like epi pens, pet and animal allergies and so on. At first I really did think it was just a thing that humans have, that some randomly suffer from what is termed ‘an unlucky set of genes’ or when they say ‘it’s hereditary’. I just thought that was true, and it may well be, but I started to wonder if it wasn’t, or at least for some issues maybe it wasn’t, and perhaps it was environment.

I have had many a discussion about nature versus nurture, and whether you are set up to fail with your set of genes and family coding you are given. Or if you are flexible enough to overcome all situations and ‘come good’ as they say, even if you have been held back or held down in such a way that has quite detrimental effects. See my article Plants and People for a thought about what happens when you restrict the conditions for growing and development, it’s a much harder road thereafter.

But with the allergies that have sprung up over the years – peanut, pets, hay-fever, wheat, dairy etc. And all the changes being implemented in the environment with GM crops, manipulating insects to carry certain pathogens (see ticks and plum island for a previous run of that type of thing), and animals being given things so that we get to ingest product manipulated at source. It seemed prudent to give thought to what else might be caused by these things, or be the cause of these things.

Mentioned already in Fruit and Nut, about how streamlining certain proteins in products may have had a knock-on effect.

In The Dark looked at how perhaps it is part of a plan to not block out the sun, but just maybe hamper our ability to be in it.

A Spoonful of Honey and Playing Chicken has considered the option that those mainly targeted foods are the best ones for us, so they too need to be ‘tinkered with’.

Insects, livestock, wildlife, plant life and the environment generally appear to be getting a makeover. Like in my article School, But Bigger, but not just corporatism for us, looks like the whole of nature is expected to fall in line and jump on the Monopoly board called society.

But when there have been various discussions about Downsizing the populations of the world, and of having warehouses filled with the ‘living dead’ for spare body parts and such, I think alarm bells should maybe be ringing for many people. Of what we are viewed as, or what we have been earmarked for, should very much be of concern for people. Animals have been in the open firing line for some time, and not just the ones in experimental situations like The Beautiful Mice. All the others in nature who have been subject to change and policies for a while inside and outside of farming and agriculture – cows, pigs, badgers, birds, fish and various other things you hear off here and there. Making headlines because it is meant to, for purpose. Just like the recent milk issue rumbling on, making people react, boycott, pay attention and demand transparency. Personally, I think we are past that point, they already have all their fingers in all the pies, and whatever game is being played now seems just to keep the people busy squabbling over things that have already happened. If they are telling you about it, it’s because it’s already in place, or it’s a distraction.

But what isn’t a distraction, is your life, and how it’s being intruded upon in so many different ways, but to be fair, it always was. All the systems were part of the previous model, the NHS, the schools, the small towns and villages where you could ‘feel safe’ and everything was there. And I understand why people look back to what they see or remember as a ‘better time’, to think there was a time when it wasn’t so insidious, but for someone as cynical as me, there wasn’t a ‘better time’ created by government as such. It was a different time, where people were held down and herded along in different ways.

Creating the mentality they needed at the time, those quiet and safe times of the 50’s and 60s that people talk about and remember, were off the back of the war and severe emotional trauma and distress, as well as a number of generations being removed from a family. The long-term effect of that may just have provided a more compliant population, a quieter one, an easier one to condition to then pass on to their children. To then create a new environment when needed for the same downtrodden mentality, just like we are seeing today, it’s just a different method and Perhaps a different motive…

(c) K Wicks