In Your Pocket

In order to get to people, a way was needed to ensure they would stay where they were meant to. That they would keep coming back for more rules and order, keep the system going, and feed it a new generation over and over.

And while you get told There Is No Free Ride, we see that, in fact, there does seem to be. Well, On The Face of It there is. Because free isn’t free in modern society, you pay with your taxes, time, energy, and thoughts, and at least what used to happen, is it appeared that the people who contributed to that ‘pot’ were the ones who benefitted from it thereafter. Many times, we have had the discussion in this country amongst ourselves, and the attitudes towards those who don’t pull their weight, social stigma being attached to them, then just frowned upon. Now it seems to be applauded and encouraged, with more and more reasons being found of why people aren’t able to support themselves, because it seems they don’t really want people being able to Looking After Yourself.

But as child benefits take a centre stage again, I still can’t really get my head around people being given money for having children. The argument is currently whether the cap on only receiving benefits for up to two children should be reviewed. The population numbers, the demographics and finances for everyone are being looked at, who is breeding, where are they from, and trying to calculate the percentages and targets for a ‘perfect ratio’. Another of those models and simulations that affect our actual lives, as policies and societal changes occur off the back of them. They register and keep people in the system through their children, bribing them with money for complete access to them, from birth as discussed in What Are We Worth?. Realising myself that if people don’t line up for that birth certificate and payout, they can’t track people, can’t get people in line for monitoring and for their life of tax slavery, A Working Strategy that appears to change with the times.

The Ministry of Monitoring is the modern version of times past, where they are updating the model to incorporate and utilise technology, where we become part of The Digital Doomsday Database. One size fits all and you must comply to get on by, sign in, sign up and collect your payment for your contribution to society. Many people have moaned for years about child benefit, about why should people who don’t have kids pay for those who do, and it’s a good argument. But it detracts from the real question to me, what do they expect in exchange for that payment? A contract of sorts being entered into, where you must adhere to their rules of healthcare, education and structure, fitting in to the system and getting the ‘benefit’ of that. And many now do think that the cap should be raised for that particular benefit, but again, an argument ensues about who deserves it, as we have lots of new arrivals with a much higher birth rate than we have had for over 100 years.

So, rather than ask the question of why there is even a need to have government subsidies for families and lives, people just argue about how much and who should get it. Yet, we notice when a business or company is surviving solely on government top ups, and usually comment that it isn’t right, either they need to admit they can’t manage, or assess what the restrictions are that force the reliance on handouts and subsidies. Holding Us Back has been part of the plan for quite some time. Using our own time and money against us in a continuous cycle of control with emotional, pharmaceutical, and psychological factors heavily interwoven and overlayed so can be even harder to see through it all and know which way is even up. But wouldn’t it be nice if there was no need at all to be in the pocket of the government? They didn’t take anything from you, and in return, you don’t take anything from them, everyone able to support themselves and each other, without a grossly distorted and mismanaged overseer waiting to destroy your family, your dreams, your livelihood and future if you disagree with them or don’t pay your ‘fee’ for making your way in the world. Wouldn’t that be nice…

(c) MKW Publishing

Rich and Poor

A divide we hear much about, and as the picture of graffiti represents, it’s been noticed. But I see a problem with the whole process, apart from the money and greed that is used to control people and create that divide. They use mentality against people as well. But for people for determine whether they are rich or poor, usually depends entirely on money. In their own eyes as well as society.

But have you ever heard sayings about people having achieved something quite special, or have something that it would seem money can’t buy, and they deem themselves to be the richest person in the world? So it is seems necessary for people to generally equate those two extremes to have a monetary value. If you don’t have much money, you must be poor, and if you have lots then you are surely rich. But just as they say money can’t you buy you class, or talent, or character, it seems it also cannot buy you the richness of heart necessary to be a good human being. That comes from within, and doesn’t have a price or a receipt. But for the greedy, needy society to work as they would like, it requires people to earn money, to have it and spend it, save it and want it. And then to want more of it, to then hoard it and hide it, use it to manipulate, buy and control people. What’s that saying again? Money is the root of all evil. And now I have a bit more perspective and experience, I get it. I thought I understood it, and I did on a basic level, but still managed to convince myself that a bit of money is ok, as long as it’s treated properly. Completely overlooking the fact that is not necessary at all. A group effort can achieve the same thing, with no financial reward for anyone, yet everyone can have what they need, it seems so simple.

And although on the whole, we may seem like simple creatures, with the basic needs of shelter, food, water and procreation. There is the other side of us that is not so basic, and is quite destructive and prone to temptations, of greed, lust, desire, power and control. And money facilitates all of those things quite well, so of course, you would want everyone to be beholden to money. There have been a number of articles about money, mostly covered in Cash Compilation, looking at it from a functional point of view and how we might do better with it. Now I wonder more along the lines of doing without it, but realise we may have gone past that point already, as digital has changed the way that people view money and physical freedom, there seem to be new ways to enslave and mentally distract people. With points and likes, validation and status, wanting people to be part of a virtual and monitored world, rather than able to function in just the physical one.

So, is it that Cash Buys Freedom? I’m not so sure anymore, as it seems no one is free who plays the game of society, being roped in from birth to play the everlasting game of Monopoly. And just like in that game when it became apparent the banker was on the take, or you were being stitched up, or the tide of the game was against you, there comes a time where you have just had enough. And what if it was the case that you weren’t allowed to walk away or stop ‘playing’? You might realise that flipping the board puts an end to it, and rather than it being a tantrum or a sore loser acting out, it might just be appropriate after all…

(c) MKW Publishing

An Action and Reaction

There are three examples currently being used to get Reactions from people and to quite probably sway future policy and rules. Clearly, there are more than three overall, but for this observation, these three seem to have a purpose, are intertwined, and stand out. As they are meant to.

A female incarcerated for a online tweet, which was then deleted. Who has then further been denied what seem like normal rights for prisoners of a low category.

A male who chose to share his opinion via public speaker in a crowd, calling for violence and who has not faced real consequences at all.

A male who was incarcerated from going against an order not to post a video online, and now after months has decided to do what he was told in the first place and remove it. Thereby securing his ‘release’.

As I said, they are all different in type, but as I see it, all just different heads of The Hydra. The two who faced prison are the ones who chose to share their opinion and documentary online. So, for those it seems to be about tightening the reigns on that virtual world being created and takes our attention. An illusion within an illusion, inception style. Where you end up like Alice, being bamboozled and befuddled in your own mind, not knowing which way is up, or indeed which way is ‘out’.

The third one who has not faced prison, interestingly, people are saying should be put in prison, for shouting an opinion and trying to rally people to his ’cause’ as you put it. A physical act, shouting and being present, although not actually harming anyone at the time, and nothing can be said came of it. Yet, people online seem to think he deserves to face it, because the other two did. How odd I thought, that people aren’t saying no-one should go to prison for those things, but because one did, the other should too. I can see we have a long way to go when it comes to justice, rights and fairness, because many aren’t even aware of what they actually mean. So, to clarify. It is not fair or justice to lock someone up for having an opinion, or for sharing a documentary, or for shouting a ridiculous and aggressive opinion in public to a cheering crowd. And in the same time and space, we have severe and violent crimes occurring, a disintegrating society where services are being made to fail, and decisions are being made which are and will affect people’s real lives and future’s. But the virtual has become punishable, while the real has no consequence.

So, in order to be able to punish people for a perceived infraction in a virtual world, they need you to believe they are ‘crimes’ and need addressing. But, for years they have allowed actual cybercrimes to occur, and have even funded them on occasion, allowing quite dark and sinister networks to fester and grow. All monitored and nurtured by ‘the system’, which we as people have been feeding for decades now. And if we don’t share online or talk via electronic communication, then previously they didn’t know what we think, or what we feel, and now they do, they use it against people. To trigger you, tempt you, distract you and in some cases destroy the independent identity you have, to make you a more compliant cog in The Hive.

But they are playing a strange game with this latest round of examples to try and nudge the public down a certain path. Where women will fear being taken from their families if they say something out of line, where people will be afraid to share material that may be beneficial or interesting to others, and where people will be emboldened to do things physically as there appears to be very little comeback or consequence for that. Almost as if they lost control of the physical world and desperately now cling to the coded future they want so badly. Like an obsession has taken over and everything crumbles around them as they keep thinking it will take one more event, one more booster, one more psyop, just one more and they will have it in the bag and finally people will fall into their fully hypnotised state and just do as they are told. Just as the pied piper did, leading his catch to their doom…

(c) MKW Publishing