Plants and People

It’s not hard to see in real time what the environment around them does to living things. Every person who has had a houseplant, and maybe struggled with keeping it in the best condition, will know what I mean. Or grown anything in a pot, where you are responsible for its wellbeing. It may seem obvious but I’ll spell it out, because people remind me of plants with the same need for nourishment and optimal conditions for the best chance of a healthy life.

If you put a plant in a dark corner, a pot that’s too small and don’t give it water regularly, it starts to look haggard. Drained and tired, struggling to hold on and make the best of itself. It’s awful once you realise it’s your fault, but can be fixed. A new bigger pot, fresh earth, water, sunlight. And within a couple of days, it picks up, starts to look fresher and more vibrant. Signifying the conditions are suitable.

The same can be said of people, and any living animal or organism. If the conditions are just right, they can flourish and grow, and if the conditions are not, it can turn them into a tired, stressed, strained, possibly angry version of their former selves. There are internal as well as the external conditions to take into account as well like nutrients, exercise, light and sleep, but they all play a part. This is why when the environment around us is engineered to be stressful, with fear and compliance as a driver, it will have an effect. When they talk of shutting things down again, dimming the sun and restricting your food, water and energy, it starts a mental process that leads into the physical one.

So, it really does boggle my mind that so many people, teachers, parents, education authorities all at the same time just threw children mentally under the bus when it came to lockdowns. Don’t get me wrong, I am no fan of the education system, and believe they are indoctrination centres for the early stages of development. But to have the whole system reorganised in an instant pretty much, with the timetables and goalposts changed constantly, and disappointment and grief thrown in to boot, it was a lot from the get go. Emotional, educational and developmental disruption was obvious, which is why it astounded me so much to hear people minimise it, or plain dismiss it. ‘They are resilient’ we heard. I won’t lie, I was shocked and knew what would follow when it finally became too obvious to hide, that they weren’t all just going to bounce back, and weren’t just able to breeze through unscathed in mind, body and emotional development.

That bring me back to plants, seedlings, and small budding plants. When they are in that crucial stage of development, if there are extra stressful circumstances, like lack of water, infections, not enough food, light, or space, it can severely affect the overall development and growth. Some can overcome these extra conditions and then thrive, if they are temporary and then corrected. Not all though. But left in the small, overcrowded, sub-standard conditions, life can survive and struggle on, but in a very limited condition and certainly not all make it, and not many thrive. So, I keep this in mind when I think of people and society, and of the daily environment that surrounds us, and of the expectations placed upon everyone to thrive and survive within that. Making sure to take responsibility for those areas when it is within your capability and not leaving it to someone else, because they may be trying to use a one size fits all approach or are working to something that benefits them and their environment or situation. Be the master of your own destiny, as the saying goes…

(c) MKW Publishing

Code of Honour

A code of honour. Is there such a thing? Sounds mythical doesn’t it, that there are a set of values and rules that are honourable and maintained? Yep, mythical. But we are given rise to believe that there was such a thing. Some people do have it within themselves to have a decent code of conduct and live by it, but as a group and a society, we do not. I suspect it’s because we have no honourable people at the top, at all. So, the laws and rules they write for themselves and others, lack heart, decency, courage and honour. And it shows.

Honour amongst thieves, I always found an interesting saying as it inferred that the criminals would watch out for each other in times of need, to a point obviously. And along the way of learning about past criminals and seeing how things still work, I can see why that saying came about. And I realise it covered all illicit activities, not just thievery because as time has gone on, what is considered to be a crime, has been decided by in some cases people who themselves have broken the law. So, I can see why not everyone may agree with certain decisions and laws. But having looked at it, this entire country appears to be a rather large criminal enterprise and a cash cow for those who have positioned themselves above us.

Realising when I was younger, that people spoke of a time before, back in the days and times of the Krays actually, of there being street order, which kept things in line. People policing themselves but someone being in charge, and making money along the way. Punishments, incentives, rewards. Same systems really, but in a ramshackle way, as people do. And as criminals try to quash their competition and take the whole market, that’s what the establishment did. Took over the organising of crime, and deciding who remains in the ‘market’. Once you clear the way, you’ve got free reign with limited competition, and if anyone isn’t playing along, well, it seems the establishment has all sorts of elaborate ways to ruin you. Weirdly though, they now don’t seem to want to do that anymore, got bigger fish to fry with the digital enslavement to enact, so the streets are going to shit, for want of a better phrase. Because there is no-one now to get everyone in line, we are too far gone with enterprises from other shores now cementing their foothold.

We have a bit of a system too, where yesterday’s criminals and terrorists can be today’s politicians. In my lifetime I have seen someone go from being pinned up as Mr Terrorist in Ireland, so hateful his voice wasn’t even allowed on TV. He is now a politician over there. So, it suits their purpose to change the goalposts when they feel like it, or it’s a strategic move to gain something. Like I’ve said before, these people are playing a long game, and we get swept up with it.

It doesn’t suit their purpose however, for people to be able to communicate and act outside of their game plan, rules, systems and procedures. This is why over the years they have put things into place to minimise it, like licenses and regulations for things, health and safety, new laws, new systems, but it all neatly seems to tie in to their want of everything being digital. I knew cash would be on the chopping block as soon as taxes starting going digital, because they cannot monitor, tax or control cash, therefore they cannot control the people associated with it. So, in times like this, you need to ask yourself who the real criminals are, and whether they have tried to make you hostile to someone earning cash, because if you ask me, we would all do well to go back to cash as a first step to remove their overreach and excess power they have gained. If they can decide to freeze your bank account, stop you participating in society, leave you to die on your own, just for a political move, do you really want people like that having full unadulterated control over your life? And none of that is conspiracy, it actually happened and will happen again if we let it. We are all going to be viewed as a problem to the system eventually, they will find something wrong with all of us and why we don’t fit, because their system is wrong. We are not meant to be in it, and each time they try and change us and mould us to fit, we lose something of ourselves. And maybe some would like that, maybe they don’t actually like themselves and want to be part of that weird new ‘plugged in for life’ system. But for the ones who don’t, I suggest we start having our own code of conduct amongst ourselves, because there is no honour left in the higher levels, so it’s down to the ‘thieves’ to take it from here…

(c) K Wicks

What Are We?

There seems to be much debate at the moment over what it is to be a Woman, and that people suddenly seem unable to define what that is and how it differs from a Man. And equally, I’m sure we will have issues with the word man soon as well, because you know. Equality. Even in confusion apparently, we should be equal. However, it is an odd reality to see grown men, and yes, women, trying and find words to use other the perfectly good ones we already have in use. The fact that a small group of society, who are not women, try to make it a taboo word, isn’t going down too well. And correctly so, it seems a rather deviant and shifty move to try and commandeer the term woman and what goes with it, while at the same time trying to stop it being used in its applicable context. From where I am sitting, it looks a lot like ‘imitate to infiltrate’ and is not for any good purpose. And it’s odd, to want to be accepted as something you are actively trying to erase, shout down and not allow as they are, as if the majority don’t see it as a tactic of just getting your own way, in the game of society. Acceptance needs to be within yourself and should never be expected from anyone else, or required. Be happy in your own skin they used to say, until suddenly they had ways to make lots of money in offering you ‘new skin’, in the form of make-up, clothes, jewellery, cosmetic surgery, lifestyle, etc. Money, money, money. If they couldn’t make any money from all this, do you think they would be in the slightest bit interested if someone felt sad, or depressed, or at odd with themselves internally. And do you think, that once they realised they could encourage those things in people, and it would make them lots of money, that they just shook their head and said, oh no, we couldn’t do that, it would be unethical?

We are a product of our environment they say, and I guess they gave it away with the wording. We are a product to them, to be manipulated and steered at every possible opportunity for the benefit of their profits. I’ll share another paragraph from the book I am reading to give you an idea of just what they think of us, and how they went about spending billions of dollars, just to work out how to make us spend more money and consume more. Sounds ridiculous doesn’t it, but like they say, you’ve got to spend money to make money.

The Hidden Persuaders – “Thus it was that merchandisers of many different products began developing a startling new view of their prospective customers. People’s subsurface desires, needs, and drives were probed in order to find their points of vulnerability. Among the subsurface motivating factors found in the emotional profile of most of us, for example, were the drive to conformity, need for oral stimulation, yearning for security. Once these points of vulnerability were isolated, the psychological hooks were fashioned and baited and placed deep in the merchandising sea for unwary prospective customers”.

Quite shocking really, but not surprising. They have been working out who you are before you even knew, helping to steer and shape the desired outcome, check out my other article Nudge, nudge for a little more on current methods being used to force compliance in a more communistic approach.

But back to the current issue about the ability to use words that have a meaning, because some people don’t like the meaning or definition, because it doesn’t define them. Like I said, odd times. To me it’s like insisting you join a chess club, then moan all the time about the people playing chess, and start insisting they should be playing darts. So, instead of being logical and joining the darts club, or starting one, they bully and hound the chess players until they either give up and leave, or give in and stop playing chess and start playing darts. It might seem like a silly analogy, but that is how it seems. And I won’t lie, there appears to be an awful lot of issues towards women, coming from people who claim to want to be one. And by trying to dismiss concerns around it only seems to confirm there is a problem, otherwise it would be a normal open discussion or debate.

But are we just the sum of our sex, our sexual interests and our anatomy? Does that completely define who we are as they are telling us it should? We seem rather stuck on the perception of the external presentation of ourselves, trying very desperately in some cases to convey on the outside what is on the inside. I wonder why that is. And why it seems to be pushed as a dominating agenda in the public mainstream, encouraging that people need to be validated because of who they are, whatever that should be. But why? It is not important to me that people see on the outside how I feel on the inside, I am not a greenhouse. Showing your emotions is one thing, or wearing your heart on your sleeve as they used to put it, but trying to be a see-through entity that everyone can and should know and fully understand by just looking at you, is weird. And some people having, what appear to be full-blown tantrums or mental breakdowns in public (and private I guess), and displaying very aggressive language and threats sometimes, because someone mis-labelled their exterior in their view, is just too far out, beyond the realms of normal and severely lacking in any etiquette. Are they of such a limited emotional capacity that they simply cannot cope when encountering a normal interaction in the ordinary society most of us know or a differing view to their own? Or are they genuinely expecting everyone else around them just know what they are doing, how they are feeling, what they trying to be? And that goes for anyone who is trying to externalise their inner self, and then expects people around them to ‘act accordingly’ to pander to it, and I guess, stroke their ego, or alter-ego as may be the case in some instances.

Now more than ever is it important to know who you are and how you feel, not because someone told you to, or because you are expected to, but because you know it within yourself. Because as I have written above, there are forces at play looking to find, exploit and manipulate your vulnerabilities, just for the purpose the Consumerism.

(c) K Wicks

A Chain Of Events

You cannot make people see something, and despite all that has happened and been revealed of late, a number of people still seem blissfully unaware of what is going on around them. Wilful ignorance I believe this is, and has always been rife, but now it’s causing real issues in society.

I will also use the term many seem to want to mock, and use to try and belittle people – Conspiracy Theory/Theorist, because it really does seem there is doubt for some about what has occurred, and they are unaware who the joke is on when they say it.

Just to be clear about the meaning of those two words, as they seem to get misused a lot.

Conspiracy = a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful.

Theory = not yet proven

So, I will tackle things as they are, and refer to how I saw things before this. Some people think it’s awfully funny to take the piss out of someone, but when they turn out to be right, who are you really taking the piss out of? Ah yes, yourself. And I also understand that using the term seems a bit outdated, when it is clear what is taking place so no longer a conspiracy or a theory. But as they latched onto the term without knowing really what it was, they hold onto it, not seeing what it hides.

I have spent years noticing nefarious projects, ideas and strategies, and have been called cynical, suspicious and a conspiracy theorist before, by my own family no less. But the words being used as a deterrent or a jibe didn’t work because it didn’t change what I saw, it just meant I knew other people didn’t see it, want to see it and sometimes were actively avoiding reality to not see it.

And I get it, nobody really wants to admit there is a rather large group of people or even just one person, with resources beyond our imagination and a terrifying ideology, that have been and are playing with our lives. For profit mainly it would seem, and boredom perhaps. I guess it’s easy to imagine there might be one person at school or at work that tries to make your life a misery. But what if it was the whole school, or company, all the teachers, employees, and the pupils, and the committees and panels. That’s how it’s appearing now in society. A far reaching, high-level system where you are intertwined and your life is already steered by it. That really isn’t a secret, or a theory.

However, it appears by way of publicly available evidence from a number of sources, that we have been part of a social, financial, emotional and pharmaceutical project/experiment for quite some time now. Spanning back decades and finds its way to you through some area of life, and now it feels as though it’s starting to come together for them, sort of. But in a way, it’s like they are trying to pull a drawstring bag closed, full of different sized marbles. But the sides aren’t quite in line, they aren’t quite sewn up, and it’s starting to sway and tilt, the marbles starting to split the seams of the bag where they are loosely attached. And if you don’t get it, we are the ‘marbles’, they are the ‘bag’.

It’s like they have an overwhelming need to control and dictate your daily functions of life, from ‘cradle to grave’. That saying which was encouraged from when they started to create the NHS (The Beveridge Report), to give you the illusion they are there to look after you, to care for you. Well, now they want to be your parent and guardian, stepping it up from just a benign background support, they want in now, on all of it. Your life, thoughts, feelings, money, family, desires, etc. Through digital currency and ID it seems, to pull all that information together they have been gathering about people. Information is power they say.

But the chain of events that led us here, to now, started way back, a hundred years ago at least, longer if you subscribe to certain other events being orchestrated as part of the long game plan which led us here. Some people have very good foresight, and patience. Keep that in mind if you think there is no way it could be that long in the planning. And there are so many things that tie in, and are part of it, that it really is too much for many to explain, understand or fully appreciate. All we can do is try…

(c) K Wicks

At The Flick Of A Switch

Kill switches – probably not just for cars. If they have worked out how to install a chip into a human’s circuitry which they apparently have with brain chips, then they surely would have thought of a handy mechanism to be able to switch it off. Like the cars and machinery, we’ll be subject to the same limitations. Seeming more and more like logans run every day, because with a ‘kill switch’ comes the ability to decide when someone needs to expire, in their view. Suddenly seems easier to imagine how they could limit everyone to 30 years doesn’t it?

Also, if you have a chip, or something say, magnetic implanted, maybe that’s how people could be kept in ‘smart cities’. There will be a physical barrier you cannot cross or your implant explodes, or could just simply hold you there. Sounds like nightmare science fiction, but is it really fiction?

There was talk at the beginning of the mrna drive, that there would be chips or devices implanted via the vaccines. A few people shared apparent videos of Bluetooth ID’S showing up on people after jabs, and magnetic capabilities at the injection site. Whether real or not I followed the thought .

What if the purpose of it, if real, is to firstly monitor everyone. Give people a ‘code’ on their first shot, then you can monitor each subject and each ‘upgrade’ they deliver with each shot. The fatalities are possibly where the system or host is not compatible with the technology being written in, or can’t adapt quick enough. So faulty, expires, dies. Others will be integrating it, and maybe they are looking for the ‘one’ who can withstand the technology implants fully, to really create a fully functioning cyborg. If they haven’t already.

There is also the possibly of using the signal to that code for other purposes, or there may be other programmes running in different people, like a set of instructions, but not the same for all. And with that maybe, you could control/trigger vast numbers of seemingly unconnected people to behave in a certain way of the programmers or controller’s choosing.

Example – rage. I will use a movie reference here again, 28 Days Later. The reason I think of it isn’t because of a zombie in the normal sense, covered in my article Zombies, perhaps? But more along the lines of how that film presented it, as a virus (as did Resident Evil). But recently I saw an article about how some scientists ‘accidently’ turned some hamsters into angry rage filled creatures by doing some gene editing. And well, these recent gene therapies being masqueraded as vaccines could well be editing in something they apparently did not foresee. Or did, who can be sure.

But if you can activate a large group or multiple individuals at once, and control say, anger, or fear, or confusion at the flick of a switch, what exactly could be done with that? Give it thought, because they will have. And some videos are emerging currently of people having what can only be described as a weird episode, before they appear to fall to the floor in a type of rigor mortis type state. It could be they are suddenly aware of the system editing taking place, they hear/see things, and then short circuit. Who knows, it’s a thought in progress so I’m still working on that theory. Or the videos may just be further fear propaganda, either way, both options are being considered and I will continue to give thought to what appears to be going on. Technology is not being used as an ally here, and we would do well to remember it.

(c) K Wicks