
(c) K Wicks

(c) K Wicks
We see it a lot these days, an entitled attitude from people, and to be fair it was always there, just not so obvious for a time, sort of. Because we have different levels of it, just as we have a class system, and ‘levels of society’. And let’s be honest, it starts from the top down. We have one family at the helm of our country, who ‘rule’ us, so I believe it begins there, going down through the levels until we see it has filtered through to most areas.
People think they are entitled to things, but let’s look at why that is. The definition of it being as follows –
“Entitlement – believing oneself to be inherently deserving of privileges or special treatment”.
And we’ve heard the word privilege enough recently with it being tacked on to a certain people of a pale complexion. But why is that? I always thought I was privileged to have been born and brought up in the UK, realising geographical location plays a massive part of who you end up being. Certain freedoms and opportunities didn’t seem as available for others, so I took that as being privileged. But there are others who have more, and less, on this same island. So, there are grades of privilege once you look beyond the personal aspect. Having a certain surname, or attending particular schools will afford you certain privileges, regardless of your character it would appear. So, I totally understand why people who are told they are privileged because they are white, may laugh a bit, and debate the point. The ‘working class’ have always been looked down on by what they call ‘higher orders’ of society in this country. Which is why it’s slightly bemusing that people try so hard to get elevated to those ‘upper ranks’. Where I guess you too become privileged and can then look down on others? Because it wouldn’t be to help others now, would it? Or that’s what they’ll say until they get there it seems.
But not many start at the bottom, genuinely at the bottom, and work their way up to any position of importance. The ones who are selected, under the pretext of being elected, start a foot or two ahead of others, and often then puts measures in place to ensure others get to go one step forward and two steps back. So where does this implied and followed set of hierarchical privileges stem from? And where does the apparent entitlement to them come in and how has it continued for so long? Now we see a general sense of entitlement has been filtered down to the normal folk of society. Is this so they can add more layers to the privilege cake? So that people will overlook the failings and ineptitude of those ‘privileged elite’ because you think you can get a step up near to it? I wonder.
But why do so many people think they are entitled? Because they have been told they are, without really questioning or understanding it perhaps. Missing the benefit to the ‘privileged elite’ of you believing you are entitled and acting as such. Making demands, waiting for your leg up or hand out, and casually falling for their trap. Because the system is rigged and we are all set up to fail unless you are already in the club. It just needs to look like an unknown makes it, or a rags to riches story to warm the heart and fuel the dreams they want you be distracted with. Or at least that’s how it appears on the ground when you really start to pull the thread. So tidy and neat on the face of it, but then a few holes, a couple of loose ends, and things that just don’t add up if you look beyond the smooth frontage of it all.
So, it suits their purpose for us to be stepping on each other, and scrabbling to get the bigger crumb they thrown down every now and then. Wanting you to want to be the crumb thrower, and not part of ‘the rabble’ pushing and shoving for crumbs. And while that occurs, they can breeze through and make their changes and adjustments to the world around you. And if you notice and start to have a problem with it, they tell you it’s you, you’re the problem. Or find a way to rid themselves of that problem, or to program it out of people using laws, rules, medications, education etc.
They can never really quite factor in all the variables though. Despite the determined consistencies, there will always be the ‘rogue element’ that persists in disrupting the perceived outcome.
Be the rogue element, not a determined consistency.

(c) K Wicks
I had already speculated on the ‘opportunity’ a shared event creates and used films to illustrate my point – one article being Films, real life twisted or just fantasy? . I’ll do so again here though, because many don’t seem to realise what kind of power that has, in the collective psyche of people, and how it can be used to further mould and shape society.
The Island (2005) – a stark view of something that is discussed in my piece Perhaps, where people are bred as replacement organs for rich people, but they are kept underground with no knowledge of the real world or their true purpose. Instead, they ‘imprint’ them and condition them to believe that there was a catastrophe, a virus in fact. And the world outside is so toxic, they have to stay down there, hoping one day to win their ‘lottery’ and go to a pathogen free island where ‘you can live a normal life’. The whole society functions on that premise, until someone starts questioning things, as is the way. But I found it interested how the overseer (Sean Bean in this film), had quite a well-developed God complex going on, and took great delight in explaining how they were bred to believe they were special and only educated to the level of a 15 year old, which seemed to keep them in line for the most part. Seems a bit like how we are treated don’t you think? Or is it just me that sees it?
Book of Eli – this is a great film, well done, atmospheric, gritty. And is about a disaster happening, although it is a vague briefly mentioned ‘event’ that was a bright flash, which blinded lots of people, and then everything went to shit. We step into the story after 30 years has elapsed, and it’s worth a watch. Even just for Gary Oldman’s brilliant portrayal of someone obsessed with finding a bible. Because with that, he knows he can control people, even more so that shown. Because what we are led to believe is, if everything did go to shit, or there was a real danger to behold, that we would all scatter and try and save ourselves with no thought for humanity. Apart from maybe one or two lone ‘heroes’ to save the day or give hope. The film The Road would be an even more desolate and grim look at what they would like to think people would turn into. I don’t doubt the capability, but I question the continued conditions that would be necessary to create such a landscape.
There are a few films I will mention together here as they have something similar to me – Resident Evil, Greenland, The Day after Tomorrow, 2012, Outbreak, Deep Impact – and I guess any of the films that have ‘natural disaster’ or virus as the headlining event, with huge amounts of drama unfolding, survivors and a new horizon often at the end, not always a good one, as Resident evil showed, in a never-ending cycle of rinse and repeat. They like that method, and to be honest, if it works, why not. Gets a bit boring though if you happen to notice it. In real life and films.
If people have been exposed to the same information, education, propaganda, media and conditioning, it makes it much easier to make that group accept something, or act in the way you would like with the correct triggers, if you can get most people on board. And anyone not playing ball, gets pushed out, excluded, or shouted down. It also helps people to feel familiar with each other, gives them a social bond and sort of identity in that place and time by ‘experiencing’ an event.
But there will now be a ‘shared collective experience’ that seems so useful a tool in many a movie. And helpful to separate again
Dark City – is a film I mention time and time again, if you haven’t watched it, I recommend it. But this movie is the inverted version of the above, where the do the opposite to people. Give them no shared history, or events, or place in time, and tampering with their memories and identities, leading to lost and rather robotic people. Until one person ‘wakes up’ during a memory procedure, and has to unravel the very odd set up and ‘people’ organising it all.
So, what happens I wondered, if you merge the two. Creating a shared event that we are all bound by, but with no real timeline or end so no closure to move forward from. This could cause a possible destabilisation of being trapped in the same event continuously, without said event actually continuing to occur. And with details being changed, definitions rewritten it’s easy to see how some people might get confused, and start to feel a bit lost. Changing names, rules, areas, time, thoughts, futures and people. It all has a purpose, even if you can’t see it yet, it all paves the way for something else.

(c) K Wicks
Another of my new digital paintings, trying some calm and simple ones in amongst all the bright foresty ones. I’ll try and remember to share more of them.

(c) K Wicks
A meandering thought this one, of a familiar and well-loved TV series, that’s had it’s ups and downs, but on the whole has spanned decades and is still relatively popular. 23rd November 1963 it began.
Firstly, it was just seeing a word we see a lot these days, of a certain organisation heading and international effort to vaccinate the world. The WHO. Spearheading itself as a medical authority over countries and the world, they say. So, doctors, of the WHO, you can see where I’m going now, yes? Doctor WHO.
Now, a time-travelling doctor that isn’t really a doctor (because he is a Time Lord), that changes his appearance to fit that ‘time’ after his old body has expired or past it’s best. Interesting.
UNIT, the intelligence force on earth that would work with him – the UN formed in 1945, perhaps?
DAVROS – DAVOS – just looking for similarities.
The TARDIS, stuck as a blue police box, perhaps a representation of being protected by ‘the boys in blue’ there.
It seems quite a loose connection, but it’s been noted of late, how much the push for science fiction really took off in the late 50’s to early 60’s and thereafter. Creating huge swathes of entertainment, industry, budgets for space travel etc. It bewitched people. And it also distracted them, making them think and dream of ‘out there’, rather than focus on down here, and over there. It also prepared people by way of programming for future events, gadgets and inventions which seemed ahead of their time. They have everything way before we do, orchestrated conveniently when they established patents and offices for them. A handy way to garner all the new and innovative ideas isn’t it? Making sure certain ones never see the light of day, or are put aside for their own use, or when the time is right for their industries to make the most of it.
Part of the reason they maybe do the ritual of show and tell by way of entertainment and media, could be because they need everyone to be primed for it, to be more accepting of it. Covered in my previous article Prepped for disaster, or clever programming? We are a visual creature and learn a great deal through watching, which has been used against us in this instance I feel. And often we will accept something quite unpalatable because it is familiar, when faced with a complete unknown. They know this. Everything is for a reason and purpose, whether noted or even noticeable, it’s not by accident. So, I’ll keep looking for things that seem to be a piece in an ever growing puzzle. And although sometimes it might seem like a piece doesn’t fit now, I’ll store it for later if it seems important, cause you never know…

(c) K Wicks

(c) K Wicks
You hear talk of the categories the last few generations have been put into, boomers, Gen X, Millennials, and now Gen Z. In fact, people seem to happily put themselves into the categories sometimes, finding it gives them a sense of being in a certain ‘time’ perhaps, or a generation they can identify with, discussed briefly in A lost generation. But I can’t help wonder about it from other angles, in my usual way.
A wild theory was put out there recently, that that they have added a third strand to the standard double helix structure of the human make-up, and was speculated upon in the grand scheme of symbolising ceremonies that was made public. So, have they added to X and Y, to bring Z into our composition?
Generation Zombie. Suddenly the idea of Gen Z not sounding so cool. And maybe it isn’t the zombie apocalypse we thought it would be, where they become the real undead and want for brains (although ironically that does still kind of fit). Instead, they become the drug addicted half dead, wanting more of the chemicals and entertainment being dispensed and drip fed to them from above. Or perhaps it is the other original meaning, a will-less and speechless human, as is said in Voodoo folklore and fictional works. Not quite so yet, because although ‘free speech’ may be under attack in the online forum, there is no shortage of people who have something to say, on both sides, myself included. And for now, technology permits us to be able to share, save and reproduce those words, thoughts and ideas on various mediums almost instantaneously. But are we really talking from a place of ‘free speech’ anyway? There are those who say we lack free will already, so whose words and ideas are we talking here? Have they been planted within us through various forms? My articles Films, real life twisted or just fantasy? and Planting the seeds, look at that a bit and I have also written a few on the zombie topic before – The zombie thing, Zombies perhaps and Not quite in control, if you are interested in further ones on that.
But it does seem that something is changing, with people, society and what we know as being human. Changing into what exactly? touched upon it, but as it continues and they talk of putting chips in our brains, assisted suicide, a virtual metaverse, smart cities and various other changes to what we are and how we live, it’s no wonder many people aren’t happy. Because those things do not ultimately benefit the masses, and is not meant for the betterment of the ‘little people’, it’s for the entrapment and containment of them, in the most efficient and hassle free way, for them. And while I point out the difference between us and them, I am aware that they wouldn’t be them, unless they were allowed to become so. We know certain things are bad and line corporations’ pockets, but we do it anyway. We eat the sugar laden foods, we drink the fizzy pop, we take the medications – like good little Eloi.
Because while the book The Time Machine looked at the far future, and how things had become split between the Morlocks and the Eloi, who were just being bred and fed, for the ultimate purpose of being food. I realised maybe that’s where we are now, and it’s not in the future at all, that’s where the story tricked us. It is now, and the Morlocks work hard with their underground world to make everything appear as they need it, so that the above ground Eloi will just go about their daily lives, laughing, eating, not worrying about a thing until they are told to. Hypnotised by the siren when it is their time to step forward. Sound kind of familiar? Maybe it’s just me that sees it that way…

(c) K Wicks
You may or may not be familiar with the so called ‘fictious’ island known as Frisland. I am not one for just going with what ‘they’ say, so like to do a bit of digging to see what it’s all about. And this one I find interesting, because it is purported to be a completely made-up island, as so “Frisland, also called Frischlant, Friesland, Frislanda, Frislandia, or Fixland, is a phantom island that appeared on virtually all of the maps of the North Atlantic from the 1560s through the 1660s”. So, for over 100 years, all sorts of cartographers, from all over the place, just happened to ‘make up’ an island on every map. Sure Jan. Convenient way though to just erase a bit of the past, isn’t it? “Oh, don’t worry about THAT, they just made it up, move along, nothing to see here. But we’re not making it up…” Here is one of the maps of the time to give you an example of what there is to see.

So, we have very clearly all the other places we know exist today, with very detailed coastlines, names of places and mountain ranges etc. But for some unexplained reason, not content with actual coastlines and landmasses to chart and record, no, they just made them up out of the blue. Main question would be, why? And when everything else appears so accurate, even the little island looking bits along Norway’s coast, if you zoom into those edges today, they appear as sandbanks. So why would I think they just made it up! That’s the bit that makes no sense. Unless, you realise there may have been land masses they didn’t want anyone else to know about as time went on, or areas that would reveal too much. And like I said, the ocean may have also changed its route, course and coverage of the land, showing certain areas as perhaps, Pangea or Gondwana to show ‘when the land was attached’, but maybe it’s always been attached, just underwater. With seasonal changes over a long period, what they are now calling climate, could in fact just be cyclical cooling and warming of our dome, which makes the ice melt, causing potential catastrophe but leads to a way out, or it gets cold and freezes meaning more land is revealed and we get to see a piece of what came before. Although, we don’t really, because certain institutions were formed to make sure they are the first ones called to anything of historic significance. They then take as long as they like, often under a veil of secrecy to ‘investigate’, then sometimes years later, we get a public ready piece of information about said discovery. So much more is known than we have been told.
But with the mysterious islands, and various tales of other and different lands, is it so far-fetched to think there is more? And given how many lies have been told about history, to suit the victor, I think it is correct to question that which came before, and that which we apparently see now, because as know, looks can be deceiving and you can achieve an awful lot if people just believe unquestioningly, something to be true. And they are discouraged from questioning, or looking, or wanting to see for themselves. If there is nothing to hide, then surely it makes no difference whatsoever if someone chooses to give it thought. Because sometimes one thought can lead to another, and curiosity, if present, should take it from there and form ideas and further thoughts and questions. I am more than happy to accept that people just got it wrong, repeatedly, all over the world for hundreds of years, but I also equally happy to accept that it has been orchestrated to appear as such, moulding a very small and controllable world by way of maps, programming and repetition. It may well be that California was never an island, and didn’t have a very straight cut off line, which now appears on current maps as the border between California and Oregon, despite first-hand accounts from people having sailed round it. And while doing their straight line, they clearly didn’t notice the rest of the land, instead electing to show it as water. Silly people of the past, can’t even draw maps properly! Or so we are told…

(c) K Wicks
I’m going to talk about people movement again, specifically the people that seem to be coming over in droves according to the news. Same in the US actually, with their southern border being a major crossing point, with hundreds crossing each day, as with us over here on this much smaller landmass, the UK. And although we are surrounded by water, it makes no difference as boats are sent to help and rescue people making their way over. It’s been a great way to divide people, firstly by encouraging people to leave their home, by whatever method, then they have split the populations of where they are arriving, as not all see it as a genuine endeavour. And that’s what I will look at here, despite having written articles on this already in Hotel California, or Hotel Strategy? And On the ground, because really, being honest, most people don’t just up and leave en masse unless there is a reason. Either where they are isn’t ideal anymore, or somewhere else is better. And now factor into that, deliberately orchestrated events to force that movement, or lies to make out ‘over there’ sounds better than it is, because maybe where they are is rich in something they don’t know about, like minerals, oil, gold, water, all sorts of things that are of value to the commercial world. It’s horrible to realise how many people have been displaced deliberately, for no good reason other than profits and power, and still continue to be.
Refugee = a person who has been forced to leave their country in order to escape war, persecution, or natural disaster.
This was and is the definition currently for refugee, and for many, it fits. Because the wars and destabilisation over the decades have been many, not just internally, they have been interfered with from afar, but in an up close and personal way. Military bases all over the world, most of them for the US, but the UK does alright there too, and other countries are moving in on that. But not on the whole, it seems quite obvious who the troublemakers are, the bullies who just can’t leave everyone alone to get on, they have to be involved and pulling the strings.
And although in the last few years the Archbishop of Canterbury has thrown his worshippers under the bus, and sided with a tyrannical government on things, I actually agree with his one of his recent tweets, in which he states that
“When we fail to challenge the rhetoric that refugees are the cause of this country’s ills – that they are problems not people, or invaders to be tackled and deterred – we deny the essential value and dignity of fellow human beings.”
And he is right mostly, but no-one wants to really talk about what is the cause of this country’s ills. Just saying what they aren’t is all well and good, but to then completely skip over what they are is foolish in my opinion. Because while there is claim to be looking at the new arrivals as people and fellow human beings, how can you possible be looking at them with compassion and like that when you are putting them into a slowly boiling pot. I have suspected for a while that they are being used as pawns as we are, and will be dropped like a stone when the time comes, just like we have. So, we are all in the same boat (pardon the pun), but not everyone seems to know there is a massive leak, and they are just going to keep putting more people in the boat until you all drown, they care not for any of us, whether we are from here, or aboard. And I don’t entirely agree with him dismissing the idea that some of these people arriving, do bring problems with them, or are a problem, just as we have here already. Being from somewhere else doesn’t make you any less human, but with that comes all the attributes of humans, the good and the bad. And from what we have seen so far from the mainly male ‘refugees’ in large numbers put in hotels, there appears to be a steady increase of harassment towards women and young girls, and intimidating behaviour going on. Because that is what happens when you have droves of young people, dossing around kicking their heels, and getting handouts. People have been moaning about it for years about people here having that treatment, so why is it a surprise, in the middle of a massive financial and governmental crisis, that people might question, what the hell is going on. Why is our money, of which we are told there is none, being used to house, feed, cloth and set up people who have just arrived, when clearly ignoring your local population? In fact, not just ignoring, but actively going out of your way to take more off them, and to hurt and destroy areas of your local population while doing it. Would seem weird if a man was out with his wife, and for no reason, he just started to ignore her, refused to pay for her meal, or to get her home, and then just started treating a stranger to full slap-up meal and fawning all over them. You would think he was being super disrespectful and somewhat of an arse, wouldn’t you? Or would you have a go at the wife for saying something and being hurt and treated that way? Saying she was out of order for not putting the strangers or her husbands feelings before hers.
And this is where the part of the problem lies, being told to put others before yourself, to the detriment of yourself is taking it too far. There is a time for compassion, and to show empathy to your fellow human being, but, and I stress the but here, not at the cost of you, yours and what is right for you. Because in the blink of an eye, you suddenly become them. And they do say, most people are only one pay cheque away from being homeless, just look at America to see what’s happening, on a bigger scale in their cities. Zombie like drug addicts standing around like buckled statues, tents everywhere, rubbish, boarded up broken shops. Remnants of what used to be normal and nice. They opened the door to everything, and we let it in. I don’t mean people, I mean vice, and temptation, and ego. Gave it all a place, platform and position in society, making that more important and taking your attention away from what really should be important. I’ll go back to the main definition too here – for a refugee to be so, they need to be escaping war, persecution, or natural disaster. Now, war and natural disaster would appear to be quite cut and dry, but it’s the middle one that seems to be the main ticket at the moment. Although, let’s be honest, there have been plenty of war like situations created as well as economic disasters and famines. So, it’s not hard to see how and why there is a genuine need for some people, and mostly those people don’t want to leave their home, they just don’t have one anymore and are being forced out through strategic economic and political reasons. That is not the same as thousands of people, just appearing to jump ship from their own country, to someone else’s.
Persecution = hostility and ill-treatment, especially on the basis of ethnicity, religion, or sexual orientation or political beliefs.
So, what is defined as hostility is this instance? Because our own government appears to be treating lots of its own people in a hostile way, based on either ethnicity, sexual orientation and political beliefs. They should add medical beliefs to that now too, as we are entering a new era of things to persecute people for, rather than protect them against. Because while all these people are being moved around, uprooted, and are being redefined themselves, they are finding new ways and things to divide people up with, as well as utilising the good old-fashioned prejudices we hold anyway. I understand the problem, countries that are not at war or in distress, seem to have an awful lot of people ‘jumping ship’ as I mentioned above, which leads me to question that, as others are. Why? Is there something better being offered to them over here? Looks pretty shit at the moment and for the near future in the UK for business and the economy, so why would people want to still come here? Ah, yes, the freebies and handouts. If we weren’t giving people accommodation and living expenses and promises of more, would they still come? If it was only opportunity to earn a living and find your own way on offer, would we still get the numbers? Because many say, and I think the same, if you come here and want to work and get stuck in, then by all means, join in. No matter your colour or place of origin, it’s the mentality that matters. Because we have the same attitude towards ‘our own’ and have been moaning about ‘benefit scroungers’ for near on 30 years at least, even when the economy was doing vaguely ok. Because it’s really obvious that if you just keep giving handouts, and don’t let people get on, they will become dependent. Voila, the point of it. They will become dependent.
Children are usually looked after because they can’t look after themselves (and because it’s the parent’s responsibility), but we call them dependents. Duly looking to their parent for guidance, emotional support, financial and educational support. Then they grow up, and go off into the world to do that for themselves. But if they can’t, are unable, or won’t, then the natural progression doesn’t go where it should. I get the feeling that we, and the new arrivals, are supposed to be part of the strange new ‘parent world’ they want to have, where we are all treated like children, and made to be their dependents. Like some sick fetish the government has of wanting everyone to be like squabbling children, then they can intervene, ‘punish’ us, or put weird rules in place to ‘see what happens’. Like a really odd controlling parent or teacher might do, because it gives them the power, being able to ‘tell you off’ or ‘put you in your place’, which is what seems to be occurring here. And I have to keep wondering, as many do, at what point does someone in a position of power actually stand up and do something about it?

(c) K Wicks
It’s what we are
That seems to be what
They’re trying to change
And just cannot
Bear the thought
Of humans being
So deceived we are
To keep us from seeing
The idea in whole
That they are hell bent
On what we would call
Their plan to augment
Subtle at first
But then fast engineering
Coding the future
They think they’re steering
This rather vast ship
That we find ourselves on
Stuck in the grid
Like that film, you know, Tron
But something about us
It just doesn’t fit
Or what they require
Need us all split
Divided and fearful
And blind to their goal
To take human beings
And have full control
Over our lives and flesh
Our thoughts and dreams
The world that we knew
It’s not as it seems
~
And turns out never was

(c) K Wicks