Author: MKW Publishing

On The Way Out

~ MKW Publishing ~ 2 Comments

If you wanted to hide something, a really big dastardly plan, then people say you wouldn’t tell everyone about it. You might know the one I refer to, the big one, the openly talked about ‘conspiracy theory’ of the depopulation agenda. Many think it’s fantasy, but the idea is not new, and it’s not secret so certainly not conspiracy. But what some overlook, is that they haven’t in any way tried to hide the idea, why would they? It’s possibly required that people need to know in order for it to work and gather steam. But maybe it was the implementation of the ideas that was to be murky, and non-descript, and confusing. So that people on the ground wouldn’t piece together the bigger picture, or work out how the small things were playing their part as they happened at the time.

But there are plans and have been discussions surrounding the world’s population density and what can be done to control it, or get it in hand in some way. I’ll use one that springs to mind.

Apparently this isn’t how it sounds from Mr Gates, and has been misconstrued. But ask yourself this, how exactly did he think he would lower it by 10-15% while at the same time improving everybody’s health and environment, therefore breeding conditions? I wonder.

“First, we’ve got population,” he said during the talk organized by TED, a non-profit organization devoted to spreading ideas. “The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent. But there, we see an increase of about 1.3.”

One of the recently deceased royals, Prince Philip was quoted as saying in 1988.

“In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, to contribute something to solving overpopulation.”

Two ways in my mind you achieve lowering, either sterilisation, therefore knowing it can’t increase further, or extermination programs. Neither one seems very people friendly, does it? Lowering population means to stop breeding, or to kill off some people. Or both. Maybe I missed something there that was obvious to others but that is what I took from it. Maybe that’s why they want to dictate birth control, abortions, and breeding generally. Switching the rhetoric from ‘depopulation’ to ‘overpopulation’. Because it sounds a lot more user friendly to sound like you are halting the numbers, rather than culling the numbers. And when it comes to influencing and convincing people to go along with things, they have useful tools at hand. See my article Conversion, can work both ways.

But if you wanted to hide some big losses in work forces and society if you go for the culling method, it would be necessary to disrupt those industries and workplaces. Otherwise, lots of people suddenly taking sick or dying would be very noticeable and people might see. But if you had lots of strikes, restrictions, mass sackings, lots of changes, lockdowns, financial issues etc, then it struck me how much easier it becomes to hide the overall losses. Keeping everyone moving around and not having anywhere near the same routine they used to have. Work from home, 15-minute cities and zones popping up, shop online. All big changes to lots of people, but also means you see less people initially, meaning how would you know if any or a few were missing. And if you did, who would listen?

And when certain industries seem at breaking point, they can blame the strikes, the economy, the people. But all were instigated at the hands of the planners, the people Shapers, knowing what would ensue. With so many areas failing at once, the pressure and stress within each industry, I guess they expect the domino effect to then occur. Each collapsing under its own confusion and instability, causing a chain reaction with others to follow. Or it would seem that is what’s expected, although not quite coming to pass. Whether it’s just the plan isn’t working, has stalled a bit, or the people are showing more resilience than predicted, I’m not sure yet, we’ll have to see…

(c) K Wicks

You Can Bank On It

~ MKW Publishing ~ 2 Comments

I’m going to talk about banks. The financial world and economy are dominated by them. The portfolios they wield are eye-watering. But the premise of what they are, and what they used to offer, versus what they have morphed into is becoming clearer as time goes on.

Imagine you have a piggy bank. And you put your coins into it ‘for safe keeping’ or for ‘a rainy day’. Funny they picked a pig to hold your money isn’t it, greedy as a pig, as Bricktop would say. But you have your money in your piggy bank, and you put it to one side. When needed, you take the money out, use it, start over. Really easy, and will be why banks worked to start with.

But, let’s now imagine when you go to get some, your little piggy won’t pay up, unless you pay a fee. And the time after that, you have to pay a fee, and can’t get all the money out. Next time, fee, restricted amount, and the piggy bank has moved somewhere else, so it takes you a while to find it. Next time, piggy says you made too much, and so on. Not being funny, but you would stop using that piggy bank, thinking it had lost control of itself and was just meant to be a helping hand to manage your money. But instead, you will no longer be allowed to manage your money, because they either don’t want you having any in the capacity we once knew it, or they want to dictate it, fully.

Now, let’s take piggy further, who starts working with your employer, and the tax office and all other authorities. Your piggy bank is no longer even in your house, and gets looked at by whoever thinks it necessary. And piggy keeps taking his cut, every time you put money in, and charges a fee to the person you buy from every time you buy something. Following you in presence while you spend, then one day you go to buy something piggy doesn’t like. No. Transaction blocked. Like a controlling parent or partner, piggy takes over all your finances, decides you aren’t competent anymore…

Or something like that. But maybe it helps to imagine for some, that the little cute money saver that started as a small help, has grown into a giant pig bursting at the seems, growing in size constantly ready to explode and take people’s ‘rainy days’ with it. Just saying sorry, I dropped it all somewhere and no there isn’t any. Or not even saying sorry, just explaining how and why, with no real accountability, just more people getting rich of other people’s hard work. It’s a perfect trap.

(c) K Wicks

More Than Pain Gets Killed

~ MKW Publishing ~ 9 Comments

Many people have mentioned in the last couple of years, how people have changed, or rather are now seen for what and who they really are. And it seems a fair few have revealed themselves to be quite narrow-minded, cold, and uncaring and in some cases, quite hateful. Whether it was family towards family, colleague towards colleague or friend toward friend, not everyone was expecting how it played out for them. But what seems to have been discussed, was how those people could be like that, or how someone didn’t see they were like that before. I’ve written already about it in A certain type of person, but wanted to further speculate on how it is that so many possibly came to be like that. Of course, there are those who just are like that, so may not fall into this category, and there will be others who became what they were merely through life experiences, but this is a general idea.

Painkillers and prescription drugs – I wonder if they have quietly been doing more than what they were meant to. In my article Memory I mention that it has been noted along the way, that painkillers while numbing physical pain, can also dampen and interrupt emotions and feelings. I hadn’t considered that when thinking about addictions and how so many became addicted to them after their ailment had apparently healed, I just thought they were physically addictive, and may well be. But the idea to me was that if someone is on high-end painkillers for a long time, would severely miss out on being fully emotionally present for a portion of their life. How is it perceived when something happens that requires lots of feeling? Is it void? Is it there but just not functioning because it is being inhibited? I don’t know, and don’t know anyone to ask who has had this affliction, or anyone whose parent may have been on them, so can relay how it felt and if they ever felt emotionally absent. And again, lots of people are, and have been in their lives for various reasons, but I wonder if this is one that gets overlooked on an individual level. But as we have had a general event we all got caught up in, many had to react in some way, whether they had a fully functioning system of emotions or not.

The other slightly terrifying idea, linked to that article Memory as well, is the conclusion of how memories appear to be transferred, through cells. I’ll brief the bit that leads in

“They took mice and hamsters and conditioned them to be afraid of the dark. Then they liquidized them, and injected them into rats, who previously had no fear of the dark. Once you get over that awfulness, that we do things like that ‘just to see’, the results revealed (although contested), that the rats who were injected, developed a fear of the dark.”

So, with that in mind. We know that bits of animal, and foetal DNA is used in making vaccines, and I theorise that whatever traumatic exposure or experience that life form went through before death, whether conditioned or natural, could be transferred by way of cells, into other substances. If you catch my drift. And that goes for any of the components to things that might be injected, all along the way. I wrote a fictional short story with that line of thought if you are interested called P113.

I had to admit, I do wonder if that really could have anything to do with so many seemingly on a quest to be numb to life. That emotions and feelings become too much, or is that they just aren’t received as they are meant to. If everyone around you is numbed by medication, or feels traumatised all the time and fearful because of something that really isn’t them, but is in them, how do you deal with that? You would be seen as the odd one because you are displaying emotions others can no longer recognise. Perhaps. All purely speculation of course, I can’t say either way whether people are really themselves anymore, and if they ever were. You can only know yourself though in the end anyway, and hope to feel like you might get to know some real people along the way too, who aren’t afraid to feel. Because in amongst all this fear these days, a big theme is that people are scared to be themselves, more now than ever. Bravery has to start with standing up for being yourself, then maybe you can stand up for others, it might just be needed…

(c) K Wicks

A plan, or something like that

~ MKW Publishing ~ Leave a comment

It’s stirred some to speak out, they’ve had enough. Of the recent hoo-ha? No, not of that. But of the bright idea from the ‘numbers man’ to get everyone to stay in school until 18 to do maths apparently. So, I’m going to put my two pence worth forward. I also work in finance for various industries, but have also worked in a range of other jobs before finding my career path. In a time when we have jobs disappearing with the closure of businesses left, right and centre, and they talk of robots taking over our future, you would think it might be prudent to have a conversation about where it is all going and what jobs there might be for people to train for. Or is it that they will require lots of coders in the future, and they will adjust the ‘maths’ program to incorporate computers and binary, so won’t be maths as we knew it. Because if it was, then the consensus seems pretty clear, it is not a useful subject by any means at further level, and will bore some people out of their mind. And that was said by someone who loved maths (I have a friend who is a maths teacher, so know some people do love it), but for some, it is not a natural process to be able to deal with and organise numbers and work with them. They are better with words, or art, or practical subjects. And mostly to be fair, you can either pick up or be taught along the way if you have a decent brain and someone takes the time to show you, at any point in your life. You don’t stop learning just because you leave school, and many realise how much they didn’t learn by being at school. Being bright, and being ‘intelligent’ by someone else’s scale are two very different things.

Maybe it’s just they don’t know what to do with 16-18-year-olds, so they want to tie them up in compulsory education, at a time when they would more inclined to find themselves and where they might fit in the adult world they are becoming part of. Because regardless of whether you might choose to identify as a child, or a young person, who are required to take part in the adult world once you reach a certain age. I wonder if we will start to see children identifying as older people, claiming to be a 30-year-old trapped in a 10-year-old body? I’m sure the pedo elite would love that, given the recent statements filtering onto the internet about how it’s becoming an acceptable attitude. So seems even stranger that children of a certain age, i.e. 4 year olds in Scotland for example, are allowed to change their gender, or idea of it on paper for now, but don’t have any say in what they are taught? Grown up life Decisions allowed there, but not apparently when you are nearly grown up? Old enough to vote at 16 they say, but not old enough to leave school at the same age? It’s an odd series of blurred lines creeping in, another good way to separate generations of people, who may only be 10 years apart, but they end growing up in a completely different educational climate, with different rules. Makes for an isolating experience perhaps from those older than you, and then they will do it again to the next younger generation after that. My article A lost generation touched on that idea a bit. But we have had a varying age of consent in this country, as have others, and as we are told, children didn’t go to school previously and mostly were made to work. So was it ever about education, or merely a tool to remove a big part of the ‘workforce’ and a growing up process that many went through. I am not a fan of child labour by any means, but was a child who wanted to work and contribute in some way. Didn’t want to have pocket money, I wanted a job. Now, that could just be because I wasn’t actually given pocket money, I had to earn it, my mum used to trade me, a clean bathroom got £1 and sometimes she would let me clean the whole house for £5 when I got to be a young teenager. Enterprising on her part, no? But I was also the sandwich maker, the tea maker, and generally the helpful one. Working out years later why my sister appeared to make a crap cup of tea when living at home, but seemed to actually make quite a good one once away from home. For all my observation skills, I missed a trick there and took pride in what I did, and wanted it to be good, even if it meant I got saddled with the job thereafter. Until you put your foot down of course, but when you are young, you don’t always know when to, and if it means stamping on someone else’s want, be prepared for the fallout.

But back to the two years of maths, a strange thing to focus on when we apparently have all sorts of jobs and skills shortages, needing manual workers, hospitality staff, healthcare staff, doctors, teachers etc. Where the pay isn’t up to scratch many say, so not necessarily a shortage of the skills, but a shortage of willing to pay for them? And what will the extra numeracy achieve in this quest for re-education of that 8 million adults who are said to have the numeracy skills of a child our numbers man mentions? How will it help them? Another odd thing to say was “statistics underpin every job”. Not sure I follow on that, unless you are measuring something in percentages for the purpose of analysis, to create statistics for something, they don’t just appear. Stats don’t underpin jobs in my opinion, skills, requirement, supply and demand does surely? Whatever the real reason for coming out with this ‘plan’, it is as full of holes as all the others, but does beg the question. Where exactly is this going? Do they just want to demoralise each generation in unique ways, and then continue to hold them down thereafter? Hoping that the continued parading of ineptitude will just wear people down and make them give up or accept the inanity. In fact, it seems that is indeed what has happened, but over the last number of decades, and we just didn’t quite notice. But now there is so much public coverage of things and instant news at everyone’s fingertips, it’s all out there for everyone to see and the childish, egotistical and unprofessional behaviour of so many is quite disturbing. But these days, it seems as though there is a lot of disturbing to go around…

(c) K Wicks

Being Real

~ MKW Publishing ~ 5 Comments

Pinocchio.

I hadn’t given this much thought at all to be honest, only to review the memory I had of when it went weird in the Theme Park and they all turned into donkeys. As a child it didn’t seem weird that there were nefarious characters luring children with fun, promises and sweets, but there is a dark twist. I read fairy tales, watched Oliver Twist, and knew about child labour (all from a very Victorian perspective, of course). But the subject has come up now and again in conversations, about how it’s all there to give you a warning, or a heads up that is what is around you.

But while writing my previous article, A train of thought, I had a deviation while entertaining a side thought, which funnily enough I did not pursue, but it led me to this one. While thinking of islands as hubs of ‘movement’, like Ellis Island, and Coney Island, even the UK, i thought of the island in Pinocchio, Pleasure Island. Turns out it has various names, and in the original story it was called the Land of Toys, being a place

“That is disguised as a haven of freedom and anarchy for boys and occasionally girls, but is eventually discovered to be far more sinister.“

Tricked with promises of freedom and fun, with games and vices galore. And that sinister purpose? Well, to turn them into Donkeys, it would seem to be sold. I lingered on that, wondering on it. Donkeys. It is said, “In Italian culture, the donkey is symbolic of ignorance, stupidity, goofiness and labor”. Which is odd to me as I thought they were hardworking, loyal and friendly, but what do I know. In the ancient Greek ideals however, they were seen as stupid still, and stubborn (as a mule I guess), but also as servile, and used them to represent the lower classes. So, if we now look at it that way, that they were luring young children away to a place where they could infect them with this disease called ‘donkey fever’, turning them into docile slaves, to them be sold off to other towns and cities. Seems a bit different in my mind, and a strange parallel to other stories, like the orphan trains maybe, or the pied piper. They say the film was to try and teach loyalty, and morals, but looks like a much darker reveal when viewed differently. More about a method perhaps, and showing how they transformed some into the perfect drone slaves, in two ways. Firstly, by what they showed as their way to do it on large numbers, and secondly by convincing children of a moral standard introduced by very unsavoury characters in the real world, on an individual level to the child watching it. They lure children in with films, and program the moral code they would like to see. Think of all the sitcoms, and family series they had at one time, absolutely packed full of life events, and dilemmas, and morals.

Also, I wonder if him being wooden and different, constantly on a quest to be ‘real’ is another reveal. Of having to adapt to be part of their world and always try and keep up and fit it, to be ‘real’ by their standard, not ours. Not sure, bit of another side thought there. But he has a ‘creator’ and a ‘parental figure’ that he has to keep happy too, showing you will succumb to the perils of corruption if you aren’t wholesome and doing as you are told. Because the thing is, they can’t destabilise what you are and how you think, unless they knew those two things about you. So, is it just possible that so many people are so malleable because they have been created through generations. And when you stand so firmly by your beliefs, against a new breed of ideals, you have to ask, where did those beliefs come from in the first place? Were they yours from deep down? Or where they steered in that direction by way of clever tactics, marketing, education and timing. It may well be that as people, we have already been thoroughly corrupted, and there is no longer an original to understand what we were meant to be like. Only the version we have now become after a long time of tampering and manipulation. Well see where that ends up, but like Pinocchio, it seems that people are being treated like little wooden puppets, that couldn’t possibly understand anything, and are there for the entertainment of others. On a quest to be accepted by their standard, and elevated to ‘human’ status, but coming to realise they actually see you as walking firewood, and are ready to throw you on the bonfire at any moment…

(c) K Wicks

A Train Of Thought

~ MKW Publishing ~ 8 Comments

I watched a very strange YouTube vid yesterday called repopulation postcards, showcasing a set of postcards from late 1800’s and early 1900’s, with superimposed effects but an odd theme. Babies being harvested I guess is the best way to put it, sort of showing that they have been grown in cabbage patches, or scooped out of the water with buckets, or floated on small boats. I’ll link the vid at the bottom so you can see for yourself, but it made me think of a few things (as does happen).

Cabbage patch dolls (they are mentioned in the vid) and hearing some people were told they came from a cabbage patch. I just thought it was a funny thing to say when you didn’t want to answer the question ‘where do babies come from’, and it could well be. But when the vid explained a little more into the history of those dolls and idea, it gets a bit weird, and there is a lawsuit. In the 80’s some guy ‘invented’ the dolls, sold them, became a millionaire. Turns out, he stole the idea, and made millions. More on that here – Cabbage Patch Scandal

When you read how huge the whole thing was in the 1980’s it has all the hallmarks of a created fad, as all of them were, but my article on The first fad goes into that a little more if interested in the marketing side of it to whip up a frenzy in people.

But the whole back story they created for this fad is a weird one, although quite a delightful little adventure on the face of it, of a daydreaming boy in the mountains in Georgia USA, whose attention is caught by a rabbit/bee hybrid. He follows it into a cave. (No parallels at all there to Alice in Wonderland hey? Although I believe that is a cover story too). They come out into another place, where there happens to be lots of babies and small children being grown in cabbage patches by way of a magic crystal power sprinkled on them, and they expect to have homes found for them. I know, like I said, weird. Here’s the full short story if you are interested – The legend of the Cabbage Patch. But a few things sprung to mind from that, firstly was the crystal cave found in Mexico, probably not relevant but thought of anyway. Secondly was just word association, I suddenly thought of the Caucasus Mountains, as it’s rumoured that ‘Caucasians’ came out of those mountains. But they aren’t in USA I thought, but turns out they are in Georgia, on the border of Europe and Asia. Again, maybe nothing. Another little thought was also of those two green children being found in Cornwall apparently hundreds of years ago, said to have emerged from a cave.

Growing babies – There has also been talk of growing babies recently, trying to get people to imagine a life from conception to birth with no ‘interference’ from the ‘carrier’. Meaning they can be monitored and their development tinkered with along the way. My article Pod life goes into that briefly, but I suggest you read Brave New World if you haven’t, for an extra idea of what they might hope to do.

Back to the previous possible ‘growth phase’ though, with lots of representations on those postcards of water, buckets, and like they are being shipped somewhere. Made me think of that age old story of Moses being placed in reeds and floating down the Nile. Not unlike another storyline of a recent film, Willow. An evil ruler, death to a new born who can bring them down, baby put on water to float in reeds… a great film, but not a new story, obviously.

Orphan trains / asylums / Incubators – A rather odd and in my mind, dark part of known and documented history, but is out of place for anything normal. Unless things aren’t as they say, of course. I mention it briefly in my article Just passing through, but will put the important info here again –

“The Orphan Train Movement was a supervised welfare program that transported children from crowded Eastern cities of the United States to foster homes located largely in rural areas of the Midwest. The orphan trains operated between 1854 and 1929, relocating about 200,000 children.”

Why really would they just ship children away from the Eastern cities, to foster parents in in the Midwest, really? And the parents just happily handed their kids over to be sent somewhere to ease ‘overcrowding’. In the real world, you would expect families to relocate, together if there was so much space and resources that families could take on extra children and feed them, school them etc. Or maybe that’s why so many asylums were needed around that time too, maybe that’s where the parents got taken so the children could be shipped off? So many questions on that. But a convenient cover for why you might have had train loads of children being moved around. Did they have families at all, or were they to be part of the ‘new breed’, populating towns and cities all over with a story of fostering, or of being orphaned, knowing no different themselves. And the incubator babies also mentioned in the vid and I have heard about before, could also be a way to get babies being bred somewhere else into plain view, and into the system. They say it came about because they needed to up the birth rate in France as it was in decline due to there being the Franco-Prussian war and a famine between 1870-1871. Sounds like a big declaration, based on only a couple of years but maybe there’s more to it. Either way, a Frenchman had an idea based on keeping poultry warm, asked the local hospital to borrow a couple of premature babies so he could take them to a circus and show off his invention. They said yes…and the rest is history as they say, with him ending up as a display in would you believe it, Coney Island. Where you would have a high volume of people and children passing through I am sure, a first port perhaps before the processing centre of Ellis Island.

But what if you found something, like a cave or tunnel to somewhere else, where they created people in this way, could that have been the original way to spawn people? Like they say in Superman (the new ones), where they are grown for specific purpose, eliminating being able to reproduce naturally. But what if what we know as natural now, wasn’t how it started there – what if it was ordered and each one grown to specification, but maybe they redesigned it, us, to be able to self-reproduce – to save the species. And what if after being saved and going the natural way for a certain amount of time, some people decided to reverse that. To undo the process of self-replication, and go back to the use of a cloning process. Maybe that is why we were made in someone’s image, possibly it’s meant literally. Who can say for sure, and it may sound ridiculous but I suspect I will be giving this more thought…

Collection of cards from the internet

(c) K Wicks

Something New, But Maybe Not Improved

~ MKW Publishing ~ 2 Comments

I have already written about the idea of us being manipulated and turned into something else in Changing into what exactly?, but I shall do another one here further to a comment I have read on Twitter, and makes sense for a theory I already had on the go.

“You asked why they are not just killing us… What they intend for us is far worse than death. Humans are the host to spawn this new artificial intelligence species.” Karen Kingston (former Pfizer employee and a pharmaceutical and medical device business analyst).

Sounds quite serious, doesn’t it? And is an idea I have been giving serious thought to for a while now. That they are indeed trying to augment something new, by way of writing in a hybrid technology for that human/cyborg combo we might imagine. But don’t think of it as the Borg from Star Trek being half metal and all clunky, although I’m sure they have some of those already hidden away as old projects, or would like to if they haven’t. But this is more along the lines of a system interwoven with your own, so Borg on the inside, but human looking on the outside. And how might this be achieved? Well, I’ll say Wolverine from X-men for a reference point, of the idea to graft adamantium onto the human frame, and they intimate in the marvel film that they had tried and failed many times before they got it to work on him. So, change adamantium to a nano tech substance, which needs to be integrated with a ‘human system’. And although it might kill millions or more, they think it’s a risk, or leap, worth taking. Of course they do, it’s other people’s lives being thrown on the line. But let’s say, that’s that plan, that they keep giving more and more shots to those who have had it, because each time might be a small upgrade, as you would with a computer. Some systems (bodies), won’t be able to handle the rewrites, or the changes, and will start to attack itself, or shut down. They will be written off as failed. But the ones who keep going, maybe they are the ones they really want, as their system may have fully integrated any new technology required.

But along the way, I suspect that the compound is also designed to seek out and replicate what is already there. Giving rise to the huge increase of numbers of all types of fast developing illness, disease and other conditions, so an accelerant of sorts. Possibly stimulating something that was placed there long ago, introduced recently or was perhaps naturally occurring. Just shoving it along the timeline quicker, to get results now. And it is scary to think it could be that meticulously planned and be so premeditated. A very unsettling realisation if in fact true. When you know about the statistic from the polio vaccines ‘accident’ where they gave 20-30 million Americans (and possibly some across Europe), contaminated vaccines, containing SV40, a simian virus that causes cancers and tumors (only in the lab mice apparently, they didn’t admit it for humans, but then again, they weren’t supposed to be testing it on humans, so how would they know?). So, to me, that is a possible clear example of priming the system for later activation, and we now know they had products for the CV19 outbreak patented and packaged well before there was talk of it publicly, so not a surprise outbreak, or a new virus they detected at all. Just a power move, to start in motion a very dark chain of events.

And I can’t help thinking that while they are either looking to improve upon humans, or wipe them out, or just hold us down, who can really say for sure yet. But it seems as though they keep failing with the upgrades so far, trying to integrate software too advanced for the hardware and it leads to malfunction, disorder or shut down. And building from scratch doesn’t include the conscious part they need to have. So maybe while they are busy showing us the ‘face of AI’ with their robots and human mimicry, that is the diversion, while they actually try to create AI within a living host, but way of nanotech, programming, wavelengths and upgrades. So actually, more like the Borg than I had given it credit for…

Quote from V for Vendetta

(c) K Wicks