There are three examples currently being used to get Reactions from people and to quite probably sway future policy and rules. Clearly, there are more than three overall, but for this observation, these three seem to have a purpose, are intertwined, and stand out. As they are meant to.

A female incarcerated for a online tweet, which was then deleted. Who has then further been denied what seem like normal rights for prisoners of a low category.

A male who chose to share his opinion via public speaker in a crowd, calling for violence and who has not faced real consequences at all.

A male who was incarcerated from going against an order not to post a video online, and now after months has decided to do what he was told in the first place and remove it. Thereby securing his ‘release’.

As I said, they are all different in type, but as I see it, all just different heads of The Hydra. The two who faced prison are the ones who chose to share their opinion and documentary online. So, for those it seems to be about tightening the reigns on that virtual world being created and takes our attention. An illusion within an illusion, inception style. Where you end up like Alice, being bamboozled and befuddled in your own mind, not knowing which way is up, or indeed which way is ‘out’.

The third one who has not faced prison, interestingly, people are saying should be put in prison, for shouting an opinion and trying to rally people to his ’cause’ as you put it. A physical act, shouting and being present, although not actually harming anyone at the time, and nothing can be said came of it. Yet, people online seem to think he deserves to face it, because the other two did. How odd I thought, that people aren’t saying no-one should go to prison for those things, but because one did, the other should too. I can see we have a long way to go when it comes to justice, rights and fairness, because many aren’t even aware of what they actually mean. So, to clarify. It is not fair or justice to lock someone up for having an opinion, or for sharing a documentary, or for shouting a ridiculous and aggressive opinion in public to a cheering crowd. And in the same time and space, we have severe and violent crimes occurring, a disintegrating society where services are being made to fail, and decisions are being made which are and will affect people’s real lives and future’s. But the virtual has become punishable, while the real has no consequence.

So, in order to be able to punish people for a perceived infraction in a virtual world, they need you to believe they are ‘crimes’ and need addressing. But, for years they have allowed actual cybercrimes to occur, and have even funded them on occasion, allowing quite dark and sinister networks to fester and grow. All monitored and nurtured by ‘the system’, which we as people have been feeding for decades now. And if we don’t share online or talk via electronic communication, then previously they didn’t know what we think, or what we feel, and now they do, they use it against people. To trigger you, tempt you, distract you and in some cases destroy the independent identity you have, to make you a more compliant cog in The Hive.

But they are playing a strange game with this latest round of examples to try and nudge the public down a certain path. Where women will fear being taken from their families if they say something out of line, where people will be afraid to share material that may be beneficial or interesting to others, and where people will be emboldened to do things physically as there appears to be very little comeback or consequence for that. Almost as if they lost control of the physical world and desperately now cling to the coded future they want so badly. Like an obsession has taken over and everything crumbles around them as they keep thinking it will take one more event, one more booster, one more psyop, just one more and they will have it in the bag and finally people will fall into their fully hypnotised state and just do as they are told. Just as the pied piper did, leading his catch to their doom…

(c) MKW Publishing

A reading of my article – Ouija, or No?

(c) MKW Publishing

It seems there is now finally some public debate on whether it’s a positive thing to have thousands of people arriving and staying who do not speak the native language. As well as many other traits and values that are an issue, and it has opened a can of worms. But one which was starting to burst at the seams and rot, so needed to be opened and dealt with.

One of the main issues being highlighted, is the cost for interpreters within social services and businesses, which is being paid for by the taxpayers. Again. Now, we have had people here for decades who can’t speak English, older generations of foreign-born people who use their younger family members to talk and write for them. Which I kind of understood, and thought at least they are making their way and utilising a resource they have at hand rather than being a direct drain or paid for. Not anymore, as it appears the taxpayer is the resource at hand now, for everyone and everything, except native people who pay into it of course.

Language is an interesting thing on this island, and we already have a different language just over the way in Wales. Where the signs are in Welsh but also written in English for our benefit and the purpose of getting by. People who move to Wales do not have to learn the language, because English is the one that is agreed upon. Making it easier for people to communicate and understand each other. Spoken word isn’t always needed to convey a message, but it definitely helps in the long term if you want to co-exist and thrive.

In a job, it would be essential to be able to communicate effectively and read instructions. The odd story emerging about deaths due to incorrect medications because the nurse couldn’t read the labels. A basic error with a deadly consequence. But does highlight why it really is important. And as mentioned in Words and Meaning, it helps to separate people and communities if they can’t communicate effectively. Or can’t understand things, or themselves. And even if you do speak the same language, you still might not be on the same page, and things can still be wildly misunderstood. In the US they have announced you will have to be competent in English for driving trucks, which again is an important one, because if you can’t read the signs or the safety instructions, can lead to an awful outcome. Which can still happen even if you can, but it minimises the risks from a certain angle.

Part of the argument on the internet seems to be in favour of it being ok that people in work industries and business settings not speaking English, and they cite the fact that because some English moved to Spain and don’t learn Spanish, it should be fine here. And in principle, yes, that would be fine. If it was under the same conditions. Because as we well know, Spain doesn’t give brits handouts, accommodation, benefits, interpreters, food, or any extras for free. In fact, you have to contribute, pay your own way and make the effort or you are ignored. Which is actually the easy part if you are that type of person anyway who is able to get by. But you have to contend with being second after the locals, not being part of anything unless you speak the lingo and knowing you are technically a foreigner in their land, even if you do speak it.

I am actually one of ‘those brits’ who moved to Spain for a bit, didn’t speak the language, and struggled because of it, despite the Spanish being helpful and being able to pick up basic words and phrases while there. But I didn’t need to work there as I worked remotely for my business, and realised that also means you don’t have a reason to learn the language. Necessity is the mother of all invention, they say, and by making one aspect super easy, seems to create an apathetical mentality towards the other sides of it. I’ll do it later or tomorrow, but if you were hungry or homeless, you might be a bit more willing to do it now. And as we have observed over the years, the benefit mentality has steadily grown over the decades, once frowned upon, now being painted as a ‘right’. That people should have their money confiscated by way of tax, a penalty for working, and handed out by way of the controlling institutions who get to decide who qualifies by their standard at the time. While clearly taking their very large percentage first, and although we always knew there was corruption, it seems now it is more rife that can be dealt with. With so many hands in the Endless Pot of Resources, they can’t take it off us quick enough to keep it flowing and using it to maintain their lifestyle, mentality and untouchability. It seems it helps them for us to be at odds with each other all the time, not able to be on the same page, or agree or communicate effectively, or be on the same path as a collective, showing that Moving People Around is a big part of their strategy. And as many seem to be realising, it seems it has happened many times before…

(c) MKW Publishing

A reading of my article – Big Yet Small

(c) MKW Publishing