
(c) K Wicks

(c) K Wicks
Once you see the line-up of films, you might see where this is going. I have seen much speculation about people being a bit off, or different after recent events. And it made me think of a number of films that fit the bill.
Invasion of the body snatchers (1955 and 1978) – I haven’t seen either but the plot sounds great and I wished I had. It’s as it sounds, but how they snatch you is the interesting part. The human is put to sleep, and a replica of them grows in a pod nearby. Once the pod is fully formed, the human turns to dust and the replica is now in its place. Human looking, but void of emotions.
V (original series 1983) – only seen a few episodes of this, but it was enough. They look like us, round up our doctors and scientists who speak like us, then take us over.
Dark City (1998) – this one pops up a lot because it’s got it all. But for this theme it’s the reveal to the confused main character about what they are. The picture and quote are from this film. “We use your dead as vessels”.
They Live (1988) – A classic and of course would be in this list. Human looking beings infiltrating society and hiding a nefarious plan.
Village of the Damned (1960) – Same theme, but with children, so extra creepy.
Alien (1978) – Only because there is a time period after exposure with the characters act like normal humans. Making the difference undetected to their fellow normal humans. That seems to be the important bit in all these films, that we just can’t tell. Or if we can, we don’t know why.
The Thing (1982) – This one a shape-shifter and appearing just like the person you know. This film I suspect terrified more people than I care to imagine.
Again, there are countless others that will be about possession, infection, abduction, being altered in some way by some alternative species. So that you look like you, but you aren’t you. And infiltrating, conquering/massacring and controlling humanity seems to be running theme in all of them. Is it because it’s just an idea? A natural fear we collectively have? Or is it because deep down we know something isn’t quite right?

(c) K Wicks
A reading of this article too, if you would like to hear it…

(c) K Wicks




(c) K Wicks
It was bright and it felt like Spring.

(c) K Wicks

(c) K Wicks
We are conditioned for everything it seems, and expecting someone else to save the day is one of them, perhaps. We even have a saying ‘a knight in shining armour’ to save you. I never liked that idea, just sitting around and waiting for a hero to swoop in and save the day, whether it be a knight or a maiden. Of course, we like it in movies, it’s predictable and safe, and usually leads to a happy or at least satisfying ending. But what of those stories and the ones in particular I have selected for my usual rundown.
Robin Hood – I would consider this known by most, so goes top of the list. The classic tale of wrongdoing and justice for the people, in the most peasant revoltish kind of way possible. And they won. So we are told that he was a myth, a legend and these days maybe just a money maker.
William Wallace (Braveheart) – again, we are led to believe there was someone so passionate about their beliefs, countrymen and way of life, they managed to rally an army of followers, but ultimately failed. That’s the kind of hero they want you to see, the one who sacrifices themselves, and still loses.
Boudicca – One of our rare female heroes in history that apparently rose up and fought back, only to then be killed, of course.
Guy Fawkes – Another famous one that has been allowed to persist in its telling and in fact commemorated each year still to this day, the same tale over and over. So close, but they too failed.
Those are all apparently real people (maybe not Robin Hood), from our past on this small Island, but the fact we have stories like that leads me to two conclusions.
a) These people did exist and overthrew what was then in place, but after victory time passed and although their names persisted, the stories could be re-written to show they didn’t win. Couldn’t have the peasants getting above their station and believing in themselves.
b) Or they are part truths or perhaps completely fabricated stories to try to instil in our collective psyche that we will always lose if we fight back. Either conclusion ultimately gives the same result.
So I ask myself, what advantage would that give the programmers? Having a people not believing in their own collective power and what they are capable of could be a handy tool if you wanted to hold people down, and decide what they are allowed to know. Knowledge is power as they say.
There are also a number of films, even though many films have been made of most of the above, and there will be countless others I don’t mention.
Terminator Films (John Conner) – The central character of these films being the one to save the day and bring an end to the turmoil.
Poseidon Adventure (The Preacher) – I have only watched the 1972 film for this, but thought it was great. Someone trying so hard to save people, showing courage in the face of adversity, only to die at the end himself, but he did save some. It wasn’t all for nothing in the end.
And there are other movies, where we are led to believe that there is only one who can save everyone. The One.
The Matrix – Neo
Star Wars – Luke Skywalker
Harry Potter – Harry Potter
Lord of the Rings – Frodo, but Tolkien did a switch there, because Frodo wasn’t the one or the hero after all, he failed, and Sam was the hero, not because he was chosen, but because came through when it was needed most.
But in all those films, they didn’t just do it by themselves, they had friends and something to fight for. And it may sound as corny as the films do sometimes, but love, friendship and what is right in this world is worth fighting for and believing in.

(c) K Wicks
Some beautiful nature.








(c) K Wicks
It’s not a nice thing to know your fellow man (and woman) are capable of such stark levels of cruelty towards each other and other sentient creatures. I have read a few news stories lately which reminded me of a feeling I carried for much of my life, a bewilderment I guess that people who walked and talked like me, could do such awful things. I read about lots of grisly things when i was young and growing up, but two incidents stayed with me in particular, both within a couple of years of each other. I was 12 when James Bulger was killed, and was more than horrified by this terrible atrocity. It was perpetrated by kids, only a year or two younger than myself and I was shocked being honest. I didn’t know it could happen like that, I thought us kids were the ones who had to be frightened of adults, not other kids. It changed my view somewhat of my peers at the time. My mother was equally horrified and it was no accident I had read all the serial killer books in our house, they were hers. But I didn’t know of another tale of the past, another equally shocking event. Mary Bell. If you haven’t heard of her, look her up, but the thoughts should not be with her, they should be with her two young victims and their families. She has been released with a new identity just as with the 1993 killers. Odd isn’t it, that we would go to such lengths to give new lives to the coldest and disturbed in our society, and then let them back out to ‘integrate’.
The other incident in the news, was Fred West. It was shocking, and there have been others as you well know, but those two within a short time hit home that we aren’t all like each other, and people’s motives can be very dark and twisted indeed.
There have been many recent stories that have reminded me of the cold heart some humans have (or lack of heart completely), but two got me thinking again about the senselessness of it all. A poor boy murdered by his parents and dumped in a river. A young man almost starved to death after being locked away in an attic by his parents. Such a personal level of cruelty, up close and very personal, family in fact. So is it really so hard to believe that if people can be that cruel to family and ‘loved ones’, they could be equally so to others. What are they capable of towards strangers?
And what of the ones who were like those children, but maybe never got caught, had some self-control or restraint, and then grew up to be the adult version of that. The ones who perhaps understood that you can still torture people and ruin them without ending their life, but just by making it miserable. And when they see you are distressed and harmed (emotionally or physically), it makes them happy as that is their purpose. I do suspect that those are the type of people now in charge of the behaviour unit and the government, and that those type of people have infiltrated most levels of society where you have a middle-man service. I touched upon that briefly in my article It Looked Sinister, because I had already realised we are being dictated to by some very cold and heartless people. And they usually want to have power over people, in some capacity. So, I will always look at those who make their way into positions of power, whether it be law enforcement and justice, teaching, medicine, entertainment, business and any other walk of like where they ‘need’ to be around people. And it’s a tough one, because alongside those people are the complete opposite, the ones who do care, and want to help and make sure others flourish and bring a bit of good into others’ lives. So, what do we do? They look the same, wear the same uniform and say the same things – how do we know? And that is the big one isn’t it – how do we know who is a good person and who is a bad person? We don’t, because it’s not that simple. Good and bad is a bit of simplification of what goes on internally and emotionally, so to paint it a simple thing is misleading to the thought process I feel needs to be engaged for it.
Let’s look at it in a more basic and helpful way. Not whether they are good or bad, but does this person mean me harm? And that could be any harm, physical, emotional, financial, whatever is it. Take away the good and bad, as they can confuse the problem. How many times have people got away with things because they ‘seem like a good person’ or appeared to be as such. Or someone was damned because they were a ‘bad person’ to either you or someone else. Notable, but ultimately irrelevant. Because we all know that someone can be an arse to someone else, but not to us, so we shouldn’t judge people on that, but we do. Sometimes people make lots of excuses for wrongdoing because they were a ‘good person’ and they get away with it, and just so, people are judged harshly whatever they do, because they have been judged to be a ‘bad person’.
We should really be assessing whether someone means us harm and what they are motivated by. And re-assessing it again, and again, and again as necessary. Because people change, as do their motives and intentions and sometimes circumstances, and the moment you realise their intention has changed to a harmful one or one of hinderance towards you, it must be addressed. Acceptance can save people an awful lot of hassle in their life, just accepting it is what it is. That doesn’t mean you have to be demoralised by it, in fact it can be quite the opposite and motivating for you to move forward. We are the change we are looking for…

(c) K Wicks
It was an awesome sunrise, bringing the stormy weather with it.




(c) K Wicks